fascinating facts and the intricacies that are inherent in the facts of the case make for a great story. The baseball bat was broken from the outset when it was bought by the plaintiff. Therefore‚ the defendant should have to return the baseball bat and pay the money back to the plaintiff that plaintiff paid for said bat. The plaintiff bought a baseball bat from the defendant and the baseball bat turned out to be broken since as soon as the defendant used the bat to play baseball‚ the bat shattered into
Premium Implied warranty Baseball Plaintiff
252 A.D.2d 488; 675 N.Y.S.2d 133; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7998 January 9‚ 1998‚ Argued July 6‚ 1998‚ Decided PRIOR HISTORY: [***1] In an action‚ inter alia‚ to recover damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress‚ the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court‚ Kings County (Huttner‚ J.)‚ dated January 13‚ 1997‚ which granted the motion by the defendants Howard Stern and Infinity Broadcasting‚ Inc.‚ pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and (1) to dismiss the complaint
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Complaint Pleading
L203 – Business Law Fall 2012 Applied Learning Assignment #5 This assignment is required. Maximum Possible Points: The maximum number of points you may earn for this assignment is 50. You are to work on this assignment alone without assistance from others; however‚ you may use your text‚ class lectures and your notes in completing the assignment. Points earned from this assignment will be added to your total point score for the semester. (See the course syllabus
Premium Truck Automobile Bus
monthly. In order to secure the payment thereof‚ Jean M.Poizat and J. M. Poizat and Co. executed a chattel mortgage in favor of the plaintiff on the steamers Roger Poizat and Gabrielle Poizat including the machinery and materials belonging to the Poizat Vegetable Oil Mills. Gabriela Andreade Coster y Roxas and her husband acknowledged and delivered to the plaintiff a mortgage on certain real property lying and being situated in the City of Manila. The real property was subject to a prior mortgage
Premium Legal terms Plaintiff Pleading
The harm that was suffered by the plaintiffs “could have been reduced or avoided by the adoption of a reasonable‚” in that if the gust lock had been as Gulfstream asserted and prevented the throttles of the airplane from being advanced from beyond a low setting‚ the airplane would not have reached the speed that it did and the harm that the plaintiffs suffered could have been avoided. In this case‚ the gust lock mechanism allowed the pilots involved in the crash to advance the speed of the airplane
Premium Causation Criminal law Plaintiff
OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING‚ ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) Civil Action No. 11-CIV-012345 ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES‚ INC. ) Judge Julie James ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT ANHEUSER-BUSCH To: Defendant Anheuser-Busch and its attorney‚ John Smith‚ 234 Main Street‚ Chicago‚ IL 60601 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that plaintiff Justin William King demands answers to the following
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff United States
limitation has expired for filing this auto accident claim for negligence‚ the Plaintiff is more than 50% negligent in his own injuries‚ therefore‚ modified comparative negligence‚ further‚ the plaintiff failed to wear protective headgear as is required in his resident state of Missouri. 1. Negligence / Personal Injury - 2 Years with Modified Discovery Rule (knew or should have known injury was wrongfully caused even if plaintiff did not know it was actionable). (statutes of limitations). 2. Illinois
Premium Law Automobile Traffic
ethics lawsuit there are many questions that must be answered. The first question that a person or organization wanting to sue must ask is if he or she has standing to sue. According to this law “the plaintiff must have some stake in the outcome of the lawsuit” (Cheeseman‚ 2010‚ p. 43). If the plaintiff does not have this they cannot bring the suit to court. The next question that must be determined is who or where will have jurisdiction over the case. This is also one of the questions that is asked
Premium Lawsuit Plaintiff Question
announced that 5‚000 of the 10‚000 would get the preferred seating based on a lottery‚ and the remaining 5‚000 would be given other seats. Issue: The plaintiffs are suing the defendant to reimburse a $10‚000 fee which guaranteed a specific seat in the new stadium. Due to reduced dimensions‚ the New York Highlanders Inc. would give the plaintiffs different seats Application: Referring to the case of Yocca v. Pittsburg Steelers Sports Inc.‚ Yocca was sent a brochure granting the right to buy annual
Premium Plaintiff Defendant Complaint
Village:Amin Bazar P.S: Savar District-Dhaka ……… Plaintiff VERSUS Lutfor Rahman Mondol Son Of: Hazi Abdul Aziz Village:Amin
Premium Plaintiff Complaint Defendant