A. The name and citation of the case (5 points) John Hollar‚ Individually and as Fiduciary of the Estate of David Holla‚ Plaintiff vs. Philip Morris Incorporated‚ et al.‚ Defendants Case No. 1:97 CV 00667 B. the name of the court which decided the case (3 points); United States District Court For The Northern District Of Ohio‚ Eastern Division C. the year of the decision (2 points); 1998 D. the facts of the case (5 points) Defendants‚ tobacco company‚ tobacco institute‚ tobacco research
Premium Plaintiff Complaint Defendant
Case 1: Sunrise bank recently appointed the accounting firm Smith‚ Godfroy‚ and Hannaford as the bank’s auditor. Sunrise quickly became one of Smith‚ Godfroy‚ and Hannaford’s largest clients. Subject to banking regulations‚ Sunrise must provide for any expected losses on notes receivable that Sunrise may not collect in full. During the course of the audit‚ Smith‚ Godfroy‚ and Hannaford determined that three large notes receivable of Sunrise seem questionable. Smith‚ Godfroy‚ and Hannaford discussed
Premium Social responsibility Corporate social responsibility Audit
The Speluncean Explorers Case is Lon L fuller’s‚ it was first published in the Harvard Law review in 1949‚ the focus of this theoretical case that I have gathered is to elucidate the opinions and theories of different judges. Taking into account these sagacious views‚ I have been able to come up with an evaluation of my own. The main question we’re dealing with out here is that of executive clemency‚ i.e. mercy or leniency; especially‚ the power of the President or a governor to pardon a criminal
Premium Law Crime Judge
Steroids used in Athletics Case and Ethical Considerations: This case is about Carl’s decision of taking or not steroids to recover his prime physical condition. The ethical question for this problem is: “Should Carl use steroids?” One position for this case is Carl should use steroids. The other position is Carl should not use steroids. Relevant Facts: Carl lost muscle tone while recuperating from a broken leg and he knows that their teammates need him to win the baseball games. He knows that
Premium Metabolism Ethics Anabolic steroid
Stella Liebeck‚ was a 79-year-old woman who was severely burned by McDonald coffee that she spilled in her lap in 1992. This was a frivolous litigation in the public eye. However‚ the facts of the case tell a different story. The coffee that burned her was very hot. So hot‚ that it caused third degree burns through clothes‚ in three seconds. Her skin was burned away to the layers muscle and fat. She was hospitalized for eight days‚ with multiple skin grafts‚ followed by other necessary procedures
Premium Burn
pay the value of the checks. Hence‚ four (4) charges of estafa were filed against petitioner with the Regional Trial Court of Dagupan City‚ docketed as Crim. Cases Nos. D-8728‚ D-8729‚ D-8730 and D-8731. Arturo de Guzman was charged with two (2) counts of violation of B.P. Blg. 22‚ docketed as Crim. Cases Nos. D-8733 and D-8734. These cases against petitioner and de Guzman were consolidated and tried jointly. On 27 December 1989 the court a quo[2] acquitted petitioner of all the charges of estafa
Premium Appeal Appellate court Criminal law
CASE-3 ATLANTIC HOME LOAN: I. Determine which category the case fits into: This case is diagnostic in nature and Albert Fiorini failed in checking the management failures. Based on the case facts‚ supposed to identify the lapse in control measures and propose solutions to them. II. Describe the case This case is talking about the illegal takeover of company “Atlanta Home Loan” by Albert’s partner cum manager Wilbur Washington. a. What are the facts of the case? Albert Fiorini (Al) founded
Premium Management Control Health club
LEGT 5512 LEGAL FOUNDATIONS FOR ACCOUNTANTS SESSION 2‚ 2010 CASE LIST This Case List is not intended to cite every case quoted in lectures and tutorials during the course. Its purpose is to give students a handy citation of a number of leading cases with brief statements to help identify them. This list may not be taken into the Final Examination. 1. 2. 3 Commonwealth v State of Tasmania (1983) 46 ALR 625 Federal and State powers Lee v Knapp [1967] 2 QB 442 “Stop after accident” – golden rule Smith
Premium Tort Contract Invitation to treat
in her contention that nephews and nieces alone do not inherit by right of representation unless concurring with brothers or sisters of the deceased‚ as provided expressly by Art. 975. Nevertheless‚ the trial court was correct when it held that‚ in case of intestacy‚ nephews and nieces exclude all
Premium Inheritance Marriage
is accountable for‚ there is a possibility things could go wrong during this four- year period. Maple Energy and Tianjin Plastics are major equity investors‚ with 49 percent and 46 percent at stake they are responsible for repaying debt holders in case of failure or the lack of operating income to cover the debt repayments or principal. The Chinese Ministry of Power Industry (MOPI) is according to their share of five percent in this project also accountable‚ but the Chinese government refuses to
Premium Debt Risk Operational risk