The Boeing 7E7 Team 14 Constantine Brocoum Courtney Delia Stephanie Doherty David Dubois Radu Oprea October 15th‚ 2009 Contents Objectives 1 Management Summary 1 Cost of Equity 1 Equity Market Risk Premium 1 Beta 2 Risk Free Rate 2 Capital Structure Weights 2 Boeing 7E7 Project Evaluation 4 Circumstances for an economically attractive project 4 Market Demand 4 Market Share 4 Sensitivity Analysis 4 Conclusion 7 Board approval for the project? 7 Appendices 7 Appendix
Premium Stock market Weighted average cost of capital
Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to analyse the problems and issues faced by the Boeing company over history and provide a strategic plan for its future growth and development. At first this report gives an introduction on the background and the current situation of Boeing. Then it conducts a series of analysis on the factors that might influence the development of the company‚ they include: SWOT analysis to discover the company’s internal strengths and weaknesses together
Premium Boeing Boeing Commercial Airplanes Boeing 747
Analysis of Boeing 787: The Dreamliner Boeing announced the launch of a new jetliner called the Dreamliner (Boeing 787) and hoped to regain its leadership role in the commercial airline industry. I will apply the theories of competitive forces model and the macro-environment to analyze the Boeing case in the following exploration‚ and then give my suggestions. According to the competitive force model‚ the first point of the risk of entry by potential competitors is neither high nor low because
Premium Boeing 787 Boeing Singapore Airlines
1. What are the benefits to Boeing of outsourcing so much work on the 787 to foreign suppliers? What are the potential risks? Benefits: * Outsourcing the state-of-the-art electronics on the flight deck and in the passenger compartments allowed Boeing to reduce the risks associated with this technological gamble; * Boeing was able to negotiate $8 billion in development costs from the partners in return for a share of the work; * Boeing was able to access the expertise of
Premium Management Outsourcing
Boeing Australia Limited: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System XUELAI (ANDY) HU Contents Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Issue Identification 2 Environmental and Root Cause Analysis 3 Environmental and Root Cause Analysis 3 Rationalisation and Management of Suppliers 4 Introducing Credit-card Purchasing 4 Formation of the Materials Management Process Council 4 Alternatives or Options 4 Recommendations and Implementation 6 Recommendations 6 Implementations
Premium Procurement Supply chain management
airplane.’ Boeing 737 Introduction A. Aircraft The Boeing B737 is a short to medium wide range narrow body twin-engine body jet airliner. Originally designed in 1964‚ initially had its first maiden voyage in 1967 and joined into professional service in 1968. B. Company Boeing had been the number one professional plane company. This company controls 60% of a competitive commercial market and its professional aircraft goods and services account for more than 70% of Boeing ’s income.
Premium Boeing 737 Boeing United Airlines
INTRODUCTION This case discusses the history of Boeing and salient forces affecting the global aircraft industry‚ along with the key strategic issues driving Boeing’s competitive strategies. Boeing and Airbus dominate the global aircraft industry‚ but have very different visions of the future of commercial air travel. Consequently‚ the strategies they have devised to manage the competitive environment are disparate. The case provides a unique opportunity to explore these differences‚ how
Premium Boeing 787 Boeing Commercial Airplanes Boeing
segment respectively‚ while Boeing only had 46%of revenues derived from this area; these four companies are not sufficiently similar. In addition‚ the commercial airline segment was depressed by the terrorism events and SARS‚ and the defense segment benefited from the Iraq war; as a result‚ it is too optimistic to use the beta of comparable companies. To take the crisis of the commercial airline market into account‚ it is more appropriate to use the estimated beta of Boeing according to past 60 trading
Premium Net present value Weighted average cost of capital Internal rate of return
Boeing Versus Airbus In today’s marketplace‚ distinct differences in the way competitive products work have become increasingly rare. But functional product differentiation is exactly what the rivalry between the Airbus A380 and the Boeing 787 Dreamliner is all about: Two companies with fundamentally different products‚ based on diametrically opposite visions of the future‚ engaged in a Hatfields versus McCoys battle with billions of dollars at stake. Each company
Premium Boeing 747 Boeing 787 Qantas
have a direct impact on the variables used in calculating WACC. Such variables include the term structure of interest rate‚ the risk free rate‚ the beta‚ the market risk premium‚ the firm’s marginal tax rate‚ and its capital structure. Since Boeing has two business componentsdefense and commercialfirst begin by determining the unlevered beta for its commercial component. This is accomplished by comparing Lockheed and Northrop’s average unlevered beta which was .48 . The next step is to derive
Premium Stock market Capital structure Financial ratios