METHODS EX- CAPT. HARISH UPPAL v. UNION OF INDIA: Exceptions to the Right to Strike Table of Contents TABLE OF CASES 2 TABLE OF STATUTES 2 Introduction: 3 Research methodology: 4 What is the right to strike and why do we need it? 5 Exceptions: 6 Case review 7 Issues: 7 Analysis: 8 Conclusion 11 Bibliography 13 TABLE OF CASES CASES: 1. Communist Party of India (M) v. Bharat Kumar‚ (1998) 1 SCC 201‚ (Supreme Court of India). 2. Ex- Capt. Harish Uppal v. The Union of India‚ (2003)
Premium Strike action Trade union Human rights
ACCG224: Intermediate Financial Accounting Case study (Myer Holdings Limited) Lecturer: Tas Nair Prepared by: ZENG FAN Student ID: 43140505 Contents 1. Contents 1 Executive Summary The purpose of this research report is to understand of two important concepts from the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting----the objective of general purpose financial reporting and qualitative characteristics of useful financial information. In this
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Annual report Financial statements
Law 494 Part 1 Shlensky v. Wrigley Facts: William Shlensky (plaintiff/appellant)‚ minority stock holder for the Chicago Cubs baseball team sued the team directors who deferred the case to Phillip Wrigley (defendant/appellee) stating mismanagement and negligence because of the refusal of the directors in installing lights at Wrigley Field‚ home field for the Chicago Cubs. Procedural History: Plaintiff original case was lost at trial and plaintiff appealed. Issue: The issue
Premium Corporation Limited liability company
Congress charter a Bank of the United States‚ to serve as a central bank for the country. Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson opposed the notion‚ on the grounds that the Constitution did not specifically give Congress such a power‚ and that under a limited government‚ Congress had no powers other than those explicitly given to it. Hamilton responded by arguing that Congress had all powers except those specifically denied to it in the Constitution‚ and that moreover‚ the "necessary and proper" clause
Premium United States Constitution Thomas Jefferson United States
Assignment 2 Issue: Under the state’s tort law‚ does forgery occur when an individual finds a check written out to cash‚ and was there any intent to injure or defraud. Rule of law: Under Section 30-236 of the state penal code defines forgery as “falsely making or altering any signature to‚ or any part of‚ any written purporting to have any legal efficacy with intent to injure or defraud.” Section 45-3-109d of the state Commercial Code provides that when a negotiable instrument is made out to cash
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Law
1927 U.S. Supreme Court case of Buck v. Bell Margaret Rios July 9‚ 2013 The Buck v. Bell case began when Carrie Buck was seventeen and claimed that she was raped by J.T. and Alice Dobbs son and turn out to be pregnant. So when that happened a test revealed that Carrie had da mind of a nine year old which was consider being feeblemindedness. Her mother was also tested and considered to be feeblemindedness because her test revealed that she had the mind of an eight year old. Carrie and her mother
Premium Compulsory sterilization Buck v. Bell Eugenics
V-Guard Industries Ltd From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation‚ search V-Guard Industries Ltd | Traded as | NSE: VGUARD | Founded | 1977 | Founder(s) | Kochouseph Chittilappilly | Headquarters | Kochi‚ India | Products | Electrical Appliances | Subsidiaries | Wonderla‚ Veegaland | Website | vguard.in | V-Guard Industries Ltd is a major electrical appliances manufacturer in India‚ and the largest in the state of Kerala with an annual turnover of 7 billion.[1][2] It manufactures
Premium Financial ratio Kerala Financial ratios
REALISATION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS PAPER ON TOPIC RIGHT TO FOOD: AN INSTANCE OF HUMAN RITHS Submitted by Sajisivan.s 3rd Semester LLm Department of Law Kariyavattom campus RIGHT TO FOOD: AN INSTANCE OF HUMAN RITHS The human right to food has its contemporary origin within the U.N. Universal Human Rights framework. Ensuring the right to adequate food and consequently the right to be free form hunger is specifically enshrined in a number of Human Rights instruments. It is obvious
Premium Law Common law Supreme Court of the United States
Samuel Malebranche Intro to Criminal Justice Professor Chiarlitti Research Paper #2 United States v. Lopez High school senior Alfonso Lopez of Edison High concealed a .38 caliber revolver into school on March 10‚ 1992. Although he did have five cartridges‚ the gun was not loaded. Lopez told authority that he was to deliver the firearm in exchange for 40 dollars. He was caught by authority because of anonymous tips by fellow classmates. He was confronted and confessed to the crime. He was
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States Congress
Does Farmer have any claim(s) for damages against Pilot based on intentional tort? Discuss. Rule of Law : The essential requirements of intentional torts are the elements of intent‚ injury‚ damages and causation. The concept of ’intention’ does not require that Defendant (D) know that his/her act will cause harm to the Plaintiff (P)‚ but must know with substantial certainty that their act will result in certain outcomes (landing of the plane on the P’s land). To successfully make a claim against
Premium Tort law Law Tort