------------------------------------------------- Case Details: | ------------------------------------------------- | Case Code | : | BECG122 | | Case Length | : | 17 Pages | | Period | : | 2006-2011 | | Organization | : | PepsiCo | | Pub Date | : | 2012 | | Teaching Note | : | Available | | Countries | : | Global | | Industry | : | Food and Beverages | | * This case was a Runner-up in the 2012 oikos Global Case Writing Competition (Corporate Sustainability track)‚ organized
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola
Case #14: Google’s Strategy in 2008 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Competitive Forces 3 Force 1: Rival Sellers 3 Force 2: New Entrants 4 Force3: Substitute Products 4 Force 4: Suppliers 4 Force 5: Internet Users 5 Driving Forces 5 Key Success Factors 6 Google’s Business Model 7 Financial Analysis 8 SWOT Analysis 9 Recommendations 11 References 12 Tables 13 Executive Summary Google went from a startup company operating on a shoestring budget
Premium Web search engine Google Bing
is PepsiCo’s corporate strategy? Briefly identify the business strategies that PepsiCo is using in each of its consumer business segments in 2008. PepsiCo’s corporate strategy had diversified‚ in 2008‚ the company into salty and sweet snacks‚ soft drinks‚ orange juice‚ bottled water‚ and ready-to-eat drink teas and coffees‚ purified and functional waters‚ isotonic beverages‚ hot and ready-to-eat breakfast cereals‚ grain-based products‚ and breakfast condiments. Strategies that kept their brands
Premium
Objectives | 9 | VI. Polices ‚Values &Statements | 10 | VII. Social Responsibility | 13 | VIII. Financial Analysis | 15 | i. Liquidity Ratios | 15 | ii. Activity Ratios | 16 | iii. Debt Ratios | 19 | iv. Profitability Ratios | 20 | v. Market Ratios | 23 | Phase Two | | I. General Environment (PEST Analysis) | 24 | II. Porter’s model (PM) | 28 | III. Strategic groups (SG) | 30 | IV. Competitors profile matrix (CPM) | 32
Premium Financial ratio Coca-Cola Soft drink
Running head: Contemporary Business- BUS 508 April 28‚ 2012 Assignment #2 Diversification Strategies “Virgin Group and Benetton Group” Gilbert Feliciano II Professor- Dr. Brian Collins Strayer University CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS- BUS 508 2 ABSTRACT The diversification literature has largely focused on the degree of applicability of firm resources to a new industry: A firm should diversify into more related industries since synergistic benefits decrease with the distance between
Premium Virgin Group Brand Richard Branson
Diversification Strategies in the Global Retailing Industry: Essays on the Dimensions and Performance Implications DISSERTATION of the University of St. Gallen‚ School of Management‚ Economics‚ Law‚ Social Sciences and International Affairs to obtain the title of Doctor of Philosophy in Management submitted by Timo Sohl from Germany Approved on the application of Prof. Dr. Thomas Rudolph and Prof. Dr. Günter Müller-Stewens Dissertation no. 3987 Difo-Druck GmbH‚ Bamberg 2012
Premium Retailing Shopping mall
Executive Summary PepsiCo Inc. is an American multinational food‚ snack‚ and beverage corporation that divided its products into five categories: Pepsi-Cola‚ Frito-Lay‚ Tropicana‚ Quaker‚ and Gatorade‚ and each category have plenty of brands. In fact‚ according to PepsiCo’s official website‚ PepsiCo leads food and beverage leader portfolio that includes 22 brands. The company reported sales of $510 million and has 19‚000 employees (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PepsiCo). Moreover‚ the company employed
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi
and the current Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo‚ the second largest food and beverage business in the world by net revenue. (Figure 1) Figure 1 - Chief Executive (CEO) of PepsiCo Product range or most profitable products PepsiCo make‚ sell and distribute a variety of convenient and enjoyable foods and beverages in more than 200 countries and territories. Beverage business is the largest and highly profitable business. Figure 3 - PepsiCo has 17 mega brands that generate $1 billion
Premium
Diversification in E- Commerce [pic] Diana Reyes – 27828 Introduction Economies of scope and synergies in business operations are consequences of diversification strategies. It is possible to classify companies according to the type of diversification strategy selected. Unrelated diversifiers are companies that diversify across industry‚ while related diversifiers are firms that diversify within the industry (Kim‚ Hwang and Burgers 1989). Companies pursuing related diversification over
Premium Strategic management Business model
SYMBIOSIS INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES MARKETING MANAGEMENT PROF V.V Ramasastry “Research Paper- Diversification leads to success?” Submitted By- Anil -15
Premium Risk Investment Small business