policies‚ promotional activities‚ pricing policies‚ and distribution arrangements? 4. “Global localization” (globalization) is a policy that both companies have implemented successfully. Give examples for each company from the case. 5. How can Pepsi and Coke confront the issues of water use in the manufacture of their products? How can they diffuse further boycotts or demonstrations against the products? How effective are activist groups like the one that launched the campaign in California? Should
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Carbonation
Project On “A COMPARITIVE STUDY ON CONSUMER PREFERENCE ON SOFT DRINKS” Submitted by: Pramod Patel 32 Umesh Pathak 33 Sampath CH 36 Ajit Yadav 46 Rahul Singh 42
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Soft drink
Cola Wars Continue : Coke and Pepsi in 2006 1. Why historically has the soft drink industry been so profitable? * High rate of consumption increasing at an average of 3% per year * Increasing availability of CSDs * Introduction of diet and flavoured varieties Year | 1970 | 1975 | 1981 | 1985 | 1990 | 1994 | 1996 | 1998 | 2004 | Consumption in Cases (million) | 3090 | 3780 | 5180 | 6500 | 7780 | 8710 | 9290 | 9880 | 10240 | 2. Compare the economics of concentrated
Premium Pepsi Bottle Coca-Cola
Compete in India History Background Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India Case Summary Indian softdrinks Market Six product segments-Economic crisis of 1991 leaving consumers with little choice of brands -1986 “Pepsi Foods Ltd.” “Lehar Pepsi” -1990 Coca-Cola Reenters market with joint venture “Britco Foods” -Later partner with Parle Advertising Pepsi and Coke sponsor TV campaigns‚ Urban Youth‚ Cultural Festivals and Sports Fans. Both Pepsi and Coke look to expand into other markets (fruit
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India CASE STUDY 2 International Marketing 1. The political environment in India has proven to be critical to company performance for both PepsiCo and Coca- Cola India. What specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? Could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? If not‚ could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? There are several specific aspects of the political environment
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
CHAPTER - 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION This project report is prepared for the submission to the RUNGTA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING‚ BHILAI. This project is done for “ A STUDY ON CONSUMER PERCEPTION TOWARDS PEPSI IN DURG & BHILAI”. It was based on the theoretical and practical knowledge gained by the survey. The Cold drink industry has entered in a booming stage and is now available everywhere. Proper strategy should be formulated
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi
COKE AND PEPSI LEARN TO COMPETE IN INDIA Brief Overview: * The case of Coke and Pepsi in India is a lesson that all marketers can observe‚ analyze and learn from‚ since it involves so many marketing aspects that are essential for all marketers to take into consideration * Pepsi entered into the Indian beverage market in July 1986 as a joint venture with two local partners‚ Voltas and Punjab Agro‚ forming “Pepsi Foods Ltd.” While Coca-Cola followed suit in 1990 with a joint venture
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola
the products of PepsiCo: The major brand categories owned by PepsiCo‚ Inc. include Pepsi‚ Frito-Lay‚ Gatorade‚ Quaker Oats and Tropicana. Each of these has numerous other product offerings in their respective categories‚ both U.S. and internationally 1. Pepsi 2. Diet Pepsi 3. Caffeine-Free Pepsi 4. Caffeine-Free Diet Pepsi 5. Pepsi Wild Cherry 6. Diet Pepsi Wild Cherry 7. Diet Pepsi Vanilla 8. Pepsi ONE LITRATURE REVIEW: • According to kabir c. sen (june‚1997) Unlike
Premium Pepsi Cola Soft drink
Case Study: Coke and Pepsi in India: Coca-Cola controlled the Indian market until 1977‚ when the Janata Party beat the Congress Party of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. To punish Coca-Cola’s principal bottler‚ a Congress Party stalwart and longtime Gandhi supporter‚ the Janata government demanded that Coca-Cola transfer its syrup formula to an Indian subsidiary. Coca-Cola balked and withdrew from the country. India‚ now left without both Coca-Cola and Pepsi‚ became a protected market. In the
Premium Indira Gandhi Coca-Cola India
Case Study: Coke & Pepsi learn to compete in India Timing of entry into the Indian market brought different results for PepsiCo and Coca-Cola India. What benefits or disadvantages accrued as a result of earlier or later market entry? Coca-Cola (1990) Benefits: advantages as „Early-Follower“‚ possibility to use reliable market information that´s already existing take-over of standards position as international market leader Disadvantages: expert knowledge of competitors has to be overtaken
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Marketing