Please put “Peer Review” at the top of your posting so I will see it and give you credit for it when I am grading. List your peer’s name. Answer: What was your favorite part of her/his comments? Did he/she cite the textbook if appropriate? Evaluate his/her use of online resources. (Check the website links to see if the links work and are on topic. Did your peer explain how the website was relevant to the discussion topic?) Evaluate the
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Freedom of speech United States Constitution
When a person tries to review or change their own creations it can be difficult and often useless. When someone writes something‚ no matter how impersonal it is‚ they become attached and biased. Due to the lack of efficiency in correcting our own mistakes we turn to those closest to us to point our flaws‚ our peers. From my experience peer reviews are usually halfhearted comments about a paper you do not care about in order to complete an assignment. However‚ the peer review I received and gave for
Premium Writing Essay Management
University of Phoenix Material The Hawthorne Effect Use the table below to answer the following. Be sure to write in complete sentences. Investigate the history of the Hawthorne Effect and discuss why it is important for researchers to know about this phenomenon. Brainstorm ways that researchers can eliminate this confound. History and definition of Hawthorne Effect The Hawthorne Effect came about based on a study that was conducted between 1924 and 1932 (Case Study the Hawthorne Effect‚
Premium Hawthorne effect Motivation Hawthorne Works
Axia College Material Appendix G Peer Review Checklist* What is the main point of this paper? Whether video games are good or bad for people‚ and how popular this industry really is. What is the greatest strength of this paper? I enjoyed the way the author has all of his research in such great order. His numbers and statistics help explain what he/she is writing about. The graphs are also very informative. The author studied the subject very well. What material does not seem to
Premium Writing English-language films Research
A literature review is important for finding and evaluating peer-reviewed sources for writing a research paper. “Peer-review is the act of carefully evaluating a work by one or more experts of the same field of work‚ to determine its credibility‚ research methodology‚ accuracy‚ and relevance to the literature” (Camtasia Studio 8‚ 2014). Using sources that are peer-reviewed is important because “culturally proficient research practices are necessary to dispel destructive myths and stereotypes” and
Premium Sociology Social work Research
University of Phoenix Material Appendix D Part I Define the following terms: |Term |Definition | |Ethnic group |Being a member of an ethnic group‚ especially of a group that is a minority within a larger society. | |Anti-Semitism |Discrimination against or prejudice or hostility toward Jews. | |Islamophobia
Premium Religion Buddhism Ethnic group
Peer Observation Record Candidate (Print Name) ……………………………………………………. Student Assessor (Print Name) ……………………………….. Date ……………………………….. Topic being presented ………………………….. Assessment Criteria Comments Contents (what they are saying) Did it make sense and did it flow? Was the content well researched? Was the introduction appropriate? Did it have a beginning‚ middle and end? Did you think it was well prepared
Premium Debut albums Communication English-language films
Axia College Material Appendix G Peer Review Checklist* |What is the main point of this paper? | | | | | | |The main point of this paper is to inform the audience about gun control. | |
Premium Peer review Firearm Gun politics
University of Phoenix Material Personality Reflection Using the textbook‚ the University Library‚ the Internet‚ and/or other resources‚ answer the following questions. Your responses to each question will vary but overall should be 700- to 1‚050-words in length. 1. How would you define personality? There are many different ways that people are referenced and categorized. People are lumped into groups based off of gender‚ race‚ economic background and even social background
Premium Personality psychology Psychology Person
u09a1 Unit 9 Assignment Summary of Peer- Reviewed Article A NEW QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO MEASURE PERCEIVED WORK-RELATED STRESS IN ITALIAN EMPLOYEES By Cevenini‚ G.‚ Fratini‚ I.‚ & Gambassi‚ R. (2012) Cevenini‚ Fratini‚ and Gambassi (2012) goal was to give accurate quantification of what participants perceived occupational stress to be. Their study is a new quantitative approach of questionnaire data collection and analysis. They chose a statistical multivariate procedure. Their aim
Premium Principal component analysis Factor analysis Statistics