Case Studies Paper VIII (404) Sem.IV M.Com.Part II Patter 2008 Wef from June 2009 Case Studies : There will be a paper of case studies for external students. The paper will be set for 80 marks to be converted to 100 marks. In the question paper 04 cases are given. It will be covered‚ each carrying 20 marks. Note : The paper of case studies will be offered only by external students only.. CASE No.1 : ‘X’ Limited of India‚ is the leading company‚ in manufacturing and distributing computers through
Premium Copyright Trademark Intellectual property
GLOSSARY The Patents Act‚ 2005 Section 2. (1) of the Patents Act‚ specifies the following terms‚ c. "Convention application" means an application for a patent made by virtue of section 135; d. "convention country" means a country or a country which is member of a group of countries or a union of countries or an Inter-governmental organization referred to as a convention country in section 133; j. "invention" means a new product or process involving an inventive step and capable
Premium Patent Patent application
Conglomerate Inc – New PDA 1 Introduction Conglomerate Inc.‚ a major U.S. wireless carrier‚ has teamed up with a PC manufacturer to form a joint venture‚ Netlink‚ to develop‚ produce and market a hybrid product integrating a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) with a “smart” cellular phone. Its first product is tentatively called ConneCtor. ConneCtor directly transmits and receives both data and voice. It is lightweight but heavier than a cell phone whose shape it emulates. It comes with a backlit
Premium Personal digital assistant Mobile phone Palm OS
Contents CHAPTER I 6 INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Situation of Farmers in India 7 CHAPTER II 10 EMERGENCE OF FARMERS’ RIGHTS IN INDIA 10 2.1 Role of TRIPs and UPOV Agreement 10 2.2 Emergence of Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Act (PPVFR)‚ 2001 11 CHAPTER III 14 PLANT BREEDING 14 3.1 Breeder 14 3.2 Variety 14 3.3 Plant Breeding 15 CHAPTER IV 18 RELATION OF FARMER’S RIGHT TO INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 18 4.1 General Provisions under PPVFR 2001 18 4.1
Premium
INTELLECTUAL PROPEERTY LAW PROJECT REPORT ON FARMER’S RIGHTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETIES AND FARMERS ’ RIGHTS ACT‚ 2001 RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LAW‚ PUNJAB SUBMITTED IN partial fulfilment of B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) FIFTH semester on 25TH APRIL‚ 2012 Submitted to: Submitted by- GROUP VII MS. GEETIKA WALIA SHELLY MITTAL (503) (ASSISSTANT PROFESSOR OF LAW)
Premium Intellectual property Copyright India
Chapter 3 Behauior in Organizations 111 Cmn 3-1 Rervonr-r- Coir‚rpawy Fred Bevins‚ controller of the Rendeli Company‚ was concerned about the organizational status of his divisional controllers. In 1985 and for many years previously‚ the divisional controllers reported to the general managers of their divisions. Although Mr. Bevins knew this to be the general practice in many other divisionally organized companies‚ he was not entirely satisfied with it. His interest in making a change
Premium Management
GMO’s Research The issue of genetically modified organisms is drawing unprecedented media attention due to its potential of bringing about fundamental changes in the genetic make up of living beings. Following paragraphs throw some light on this controversial subject. What are Genetically Modified Organisms? The genetically modified organisms or GMOs are the animals and plants that are genetically modified in order to develop the useful or desired traits. The techniques used to carry out genetic
Premium Management Health care Medicine
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION ECON 1102 REGULATORY INSTITUTIONS OF THE WORD ECONOMY Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (Trips) Have Been Adopted With A View To Encourage Fair Competition At The International Level‚ But Trips Rules Tilt The Balance In Favour Of Imperfect Competition With Each Country And Exacerbates International Inequalities. (Discussion With Reference To Pharmaceutical Industry) Name of Lecturer : Rajendran K S Name of Student : Nilesh Singh
Premium Pharmaceutical industry Patent Generic drug
PROTECTING CUISINE UNDER THE RUBRIC OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: SHOULD THE LAW PLAY A BIGGER ROLE IN THE KITCHEN? Emily Cunningham ∗ Cite as 9 J. HIGH TECH. L. 21 (2009) I. Introduction In June 2007‚ Rebecca Charles‚ chef-owner of Pearl Oyster Bar (“Pearl”) in New York City’s Greenwich Village‚ sued her former sous chef‚ Ed McFarland‚ now chef and part owner of Ed’s Lobster Bar in New York’s SoHo neighborhood. 1 In her complaint‚ Charles alleged that McFarland had pirated Pearl’s menu
Premium Intellectual property Copyright Trademark