acceptance * ‘Capacity or the ability to understand the consequences of a contract by persons of such age prescribed by law & those with sound mind. * ‘Mutual consent’ or agreement on the terms of a contract ‘consideration’‚ or reward for goods or services rendered. The element that distinguishes a contract from casual agreements is that it is legally binding: The law provides a remedy in the event that the promise is broken. Legally‚ certain types of contracts should be in writing‚
Premium Contract
BUSINESS LAW (BBL 2014) TRIMESTER 1‚ 2013/2014 SESSION Assignment title: Comparative Study and Analysis of The Laws of Malaysia and United States PREPARED BY: STUDENT NAME STUDENT ID ITTIPORN PRASERTSIT 1092701396 ER CHEE ZHENG 1102700368 ALI JAVIDFAR 1101106508 MUHAMMAD ASYRAF SHABARUDDIN 1061111744 SHAHIN BAGHERI 1092700846 PREPARED FOR: DR. BAHMA A/P A SIVASUBRAMANIAM
Premium Contract
agreement containing promises made between two or more parties with the intention of creating certain legal rights and obligations and enforceable in a court of law (Gibson & Fraser‚ 2012‚ Business Law‚ p303). A contract must be satisfied certain legal requirements which are agreements‚ intention to create legal relations‚ considerations and capacity. Agreement = Offer + Acceptance Therefore‚ here apply the rule of “Offer” and “Acceptance” to see
Premium Contract
FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA LESSON PLAN : SEPTEMBER 2012- JANUARY 2013 COURSE : BUSINESS LAW – LAW 416 LECTURER : PUAN FAZLIN MOHAMED ZAIN (Email: fazlin.mz@gmail.com‚ Room No.315‚ C2) |Week No. |Topics |Date (tentative) | |WEEK1 |Introduction | | |
Free Law Contract
Introduction Consideration is one of the essential elements for a formation of a contract.1 According to Lord Pollock’s definition of consideration which is an act or forbearance of one party‚ or the promise thereof‚ is the price for which the promise of the other is bought and the promise thus given for value is enforceable.2 Besides that‚ consideration must be something of value given or promised in exchange for the promise given by the other party in order for a valid contract to be formed.3
Premium Contract Consideration
Breach of Contract Reading: George Shenoy and Loo Wee Ling (eds)‚ Principles of Singapore Business Law (“PSBL”)‚ (Cengage 2013)‚ Chapter 18. We will concentrate in class mainly on Damages. Note that PSBL chapter 18 addresses the topics in a different order from this Outline; we will in general follow the order of the Outline Note: References below to Poole are to Jill Poole‚ Casebook on Contract Law (10th ed‚ 2010)‚ which is available at Course Reserve in the Library. References to previous
Premium Contract Law Breach of contract
OUTLINE 1. Introduction: The nature and function of the law Administrative matters The first part of the seminar covers an explanation of how to successfully study in this course. In particular you need to understand: • • • The tuition pattern of the course; that it operates as a package: three hour seminar (lecture and case study)‚ prescribed readings‚ E-tutorial and revision notes. How to download and install the First Principles of Business Law E-tutorial software. There is an early piece of assessment
Premium Law
Question 1: Issue The issue of this question is whether Samuel willingly entered into a legitimate sale of goods contract with the shop in Orchard Road. Rule of Law The law on this issue is found in the common law and under stature law. In Preston Corporation Sdn Bhd v Edward Leong (1982)‚ an offer was defined as a willingness to be bound by the terms of an agreement. Therefore‚ it is clearly stated that Samuel is willingly and has agreed to enter into a contract by signing on a receipt
Premium Contract Tort Law
Business Law 304 Case Study case brief---Gregory‚ a comedy writer‚ entered into a contract with Wessel‚ a comedian. The contract provided that Gregory would provide Wessel with a 15 minute monologue for his upcoming appearance on the comedy hour and Wessel will pay $250 to Gregory. All performers could make $500 per appearance on the comedy hour. and when Wessel was scheduled to aper on the comedy hour‚ Gregory informed him that he was unable to provide the monologue‚ because last time Wessel
Premium Contract Comedy Contract law
Case 1: In this case about 200 customers of Potter’s business were not notified of the termination of the agency and Aker who had been a sales agent for Potter for twenty years was also fired along with the termination of the company. Typically when there is a termination of an agency or a agency relationship the agent no longer represents the principal (Potter). However‚ if an agency is terminated the principal is under a duty of notification of the termination of the agency to the third parties
Premium Agency law Business law Agency