Assessment – Individual Pre-Assessment Name of individual OTOBO‚ DITON ALEXANDER Name of Assessor Date 1. Think of some examples of projects‚ tasks‚ events that the individual has worked upon that provide behavioural evidence for the individual. 2. Classify the evidence into Capacity‚ Achievement and Relationships and record the observed behaviours accordingly. CAPACITY 1. DITON is a rare occurrence in terms of intellect and creativity. A self-challenged engineering professional. He showed
Premium
Anderson: the Rule of Law Amid the Clash of Arms‚2009) From my view‚ Lord Bingham expressed the importance of rule of law through the comment he gave in the case Liversidge v Anderson(1942).As he claimed in the rule of law that the right of the individual is getting protected against the state‚ and there is a duty for the state to conduct their power based on the law without abuses it. Courts are playing an important role to make sure the justice and individual right is achieved. Rule of law is a
Premium Law
other gladiators. Some was volunteers who risked their lives. Most were considered as slaves‚ schooled under harsh conditions‚ socially marginalized even in death. Their origin gladiators offered spectators in fighting or dying will. There is evidence of it in funeral rites during the Punic wars of the third century. The gladiator games lasted for thousands of years‚ the games early declined in the fifth century. After the adoption of Christianity in 380‚ on later in the century’s there
Premium Ancient Rome Roman Empire Roman Republic
Paper‚ checks‚ currency‚ unfinished wood‚ and cardboard are all examples of porous evidence. At a crime scene this type of item might be a tissue box‚ pieces of mail‚ business cards‚ pictures‚ books‚ notes‚ and walls with porous types of paint. There are a few different processes available to lift a print from a porous item; it really depends on the condition of the item. Investigators often use chemical methods such as iodine fuming‚ silver nitrate‚ or ninhydrin to locate latent prints on porous
Premium Chemistry Chemical reaction Solvent
exclusionary rule was established (Hendrie 1). The exclusionary rule was a part of the Fourth Amendment. It states that evidence found at a crime scene is not admissible if it was not found under the correct procedures. This means that the government cannot conduct illegal searches of a person or place and use evidence that is found at that time. The government must go through the procedures of obtaining warrants or have probable cause to search an individual or place. The exclusionary rule is used
Premium Police Law Supreme Court of the United States
1. Explain why the Hearsay Rule was developed and why the admission of hearsay in a criminal trial may violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights. a. Hearsay is an out of court statement offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The Hearsay Rule was developed in order to prevent unreliable testimony from being admitted in court and misleading the jury. Hearsay was considered unreliable because it was not given under oath‚ cannot be heard and observed by the jury‚ and cannot
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
attempt to find a fair balance between individual and community interests. The exclusionary rule for example‚ is a Supreme Court precedent that holds police departments responsible for seizing incriminating information according to constitutional specifications of due process‚ or the information will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. The question that arises in turn‚ is whether the exclusionary rule has handcuffed the abilities to effectively protect the community by the police‚ or if it
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Mapp v. Ohio
IRAC/CRAC What is it? • Issue‚ Rule‚ Analysis‚ Conclusion OR Conclusion‚ Rule‚ Analysis‚ Conclusion • Method for organizing legal analysis so that the reader can follow your argument • Especially helpful in writing exams (IRAC) and legal memos (CRAC). How to do it? As an example‚ we will look at whether someone can sue for battery as a result of inhaling second-hand smoke. The issue we will look at is whether there is contact‚ which is required for a battery claim. Issue
Premium Common law Prima facie
Contemporaneity rule (The coincidence of actus reus and mens rea) It is a principle of English law that the actus reus and mens rea must coincide. That is they must happen at the same time. This is sometimes referred to as the contemporaneity rule or the coincidence of actus reus and mens rea. However‚ the courts often apply a flexible approach in holding that the actus reus is a continuing act. Thabo-Meli v R [1954] 1 WLR 228 Privy Council The four appellants were convicted of murder. They
Premium Criminal law Theft Crime