Banking Ombudsman Scheme‚ 2006 Banking Ombudsman Banking Ombudsman is a quasi judicial authority functioning under India’s Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006. The Banking Ombudsman Scheme enables an expeditious and inexpensive forum to bank customers for resolution of complaints relating to certain services rendered by banks. WHY IT Exists ?? - to enable resolution of complaints of customers of banks relating to certain services rendered by the banks. - To have a visible and credible system of dispute
Premium Bank Cheque Fractional-reserve banking
Whether or not the judiciary could be considered as a threat to parliamentary sovereignty is debatable. This essay will argue that the judiciary is a threat to parliamentary sovereignty‚ but it would have been otherwise if the Parliament didn’t carry its seeds of its own destruction. These ‘seeds’; European Communities Act 1972 and Human Rights Act 1998 change almost permanently the approach of courts towards the Parliament’s Acts. Parliamentary Sovereignty‚ Freedoms and Rights Prior EU Act 1972 and HRA
Premium European Union Human rights United Kingdom
Does a celebrity have a responsibility to be a good role model? Think about it for a sec. My initial thought was no‚ they just happen to be famous for being them‚ and they should do what they please because it’s their life and it’s who they are. How people choose to be influenced is their decision and they should deal with the consequences. But then…I thought about it some more. I thought about where I am‚ what I do‚ and if I feel like I have a responsibility to be a good role model to you guys.
Premium Human Celebrity Thought
Mock Parliamentary Debate Procedures and Rules Procedures & Rules of Parliamentary Debate (Mock Parliamentary 2010) Procedures: The two (2) teams having assembled at the allotted time‚ the following sequence of activities will apply: 1. Session to be called to order by the speaker (Lecturer) 2. A prayer to be rendered by one of the participants 3. The session to be declared open by the speaker. 4. Welcome remarks and introduction of panel of judges by the speaker (optional)
Premium Point Westminster system Canada
This paper compares presidential and parliamentary forms of democratic government‚ discusses in detail the similarities and differences of the two systems as well as their strengths and weaknesses‚ and concludes with an observation of why some states are more likely to choose a presidential system as opposed to a parliamentary system. Presidential and Parliamentary Systems: A Comparison Parliamentary and presidential forms of government are the two principal types of democracy in
Premium Presidential system Parliamentary system Democracy
government with elements from the parliamentary as well as the presidential systems. The country initially had a parliamentary form of government‚ it shifted to a presidential one with the 1962 constitution but later reverted back to a parliamentary one according to the current 1973 constitution. However‚ the various amendments and modifications to the constitutional provisions carried out by political leaders over the years have left a democratic‚ parliamentary government only in paper. The question
Premium Presidential system Parliamentary system Legislature
Topic 1 Parliamentary sovereignty revision notes 1) Express and Implied repeal/Entrenchment Dicey’s orthodox theory: a) Positive aspect – Parliament can legislate on any subject matter whatsoever as its sees fit‚ can make or unmake any laws and it is not bound by its predecessors nor binds its successors; parliamentary enactment must be obeyed by the courts; there is no law which Parl. cannot change b) Negative aspect – there is no body which can override an Act of Parliament and declare
Premium Parliament of the United Kingdom Parliamentary sovereignty Law
effectively combining both branches within a single institution. The Parliamentary system in Great Britain and the Presidential system in the United States both have histories marked by an absence of abject failure‚ yet neither system can be considered truly perfect. Consequently‚ the analyst cannot conclude that either system is better; rather‚ he must recognize that there are merits and faults in both systems. The Parliamentary system tends to legislate efficiently‚ whereas a presidential system
Free Separation of powers Parliamentary system Legislature
Critical Analysis of the Role of Ombudsman: Special Reference to India INTRODUCTION “It is not wisdom alone but public confidence in that wisdom which can support an administration” – Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe‚ 1824 This statement accentuates the eminence of public trust in a system as a test of its administrative efficiency. Any good administrative system has to be responsible and responsive to the public. Unfortunately with the power bestowed on the bureaucrats it happens more than
Premium Lok Sabha Government of India Government
Only 57.5 percent of americans vote for the president. That is just over half of our population that votes for the person that is running our country for 4 years. There are many flaws with the american elections process‚ and there are many other forms of government such as parliament and what those major differences between our system of government which is representative democracy and parliament. The first problem with the American election system is that the constitution does not state it in
Premium Election Presidential system Separation of powers