Kaplan University PA201 – Unit 4 Assignment December 8‚ 2014 Part I: Statute: Ind. Code Ann. § 34-51-2-7 (West 2013). According to the statute (In.gov)‚ A defendant or defendants may be treated as a single party for actions based on fault against the defendant. The court shall instruct the jury to determine the percentage of fault the claimant‚ of the defendant of any non-party. A verdict shall be returned for the defendant is the percentage of fault to the claimant is greater than fifty percent
Premium Jury Court Law
secondary sources are just as important. These sources are easy to read and understand and they can help win a case. In our case Samantha Smith had an accident in a retail store where she slipped on shampoo that had leaked from the bottle and suffered a broken hip. In her suite against the store Samantha claims the store is at fault; however‚ the store claims that Samantha failed to exercise due care while shopping and that she is partially to blame for the accident. The three articles below pertain
Premium Research Law Scientific method
Ind. Code. Ann. § 34-51-2-5 (West 1998). CONFIDENTIAL F: Ms. Smith slipped on a clear shampoo at 1:30pm.The last inspection was done at 12:45pm leaving 45 minutes since the last inspection. The employee is an older man with glasses. Ms. Smith had her 2 year old son with her at the time and he was allegedly misbehaving. I: Will Ms. Smith be able to recover for her losses from the slip and fall? R: Ind. Code. Ann. § 34-51-2-5 (West 1998). States that In an action based on fault‚ any contributory
Premium Legal terms Tort law Law
(2) years after the cause of action accrues. Statement of facts- Samantha Smith was shopping at a local grocery store in Indiana a few months ago and had an accident. She slipped and fell on some shampoo that had leaked out of one of the bottles. The day Samantha fell‚ the employee in charge of the aisle inspection was an older gentleman with glasses. The shampoo on the floor was a clear gel. The store alleges that Samantha had a duty to avoid the spill in the aisle. The store claims that she
Premium Pleading Complaint
Samantha Smith slipped and fell on shampoo that had spilled in the health and beauty department of the grocery store in question. Ms. Smith had suffered a broken hip from the incident and is going to be spending the next few months in physical therapy. Ms. Smith has no health insurance and is a single mother of a 2 year old boy. After our complaints were filed in the courts; the grocery store alleges that Ms. Smith had a duty herself to avoid the spillage‚ but was too distracted by her young son
Premium Hugo Weaving Hypertension Myocardial infarction
The Evolution of Management Accounting Robert S. Kaplan The Accounting Review‚ Vol. 59‚ No. 3. (Jul.‚ 1984)‚ pp. 390-418. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0001-4826%28198407%2959%3A3%3C390%3ATEOMA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F The Accounting Review is currently published by American Accounting Association. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use‚ available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use provides
Premium Management accounting Cost accounting Costs
Shepardizing Please shepardize the following sources and provide the requested information. If you would like further information about shepardizing please see the tutorial on Shepards within Lexis. 1. 566 A.2d 227 • Provide the full bluebook citation of the case. Ruetgars-Nease Chemical Co. Inc. v. Fireman’s Ins. of Newark‚ 566 A.2d 277 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989). • What is the parallel citation of this case? Ruetgars-Nease Chemical Co. Inc. v. Fireman’s Ins of Newark‚ 236 N.J.Super
Premium United States Harvard Law Review 175
Unit 3 Assignment: Legal Analysis and FIRAC Kaplan University PA201-Introduction to Legal Research Ind. Code Ann. § 34-20-3-1 (West 2011) Facts: Samantha Smith‚ a young and single mother‚ was shopping in the bath aisle of the local grocery store in Indiana. At approximately 1:30 pm she slipped and fell on a clear shampoo that had leaked out of one of the bottles and onto the floor. The aisle had been inspected‚ logged as clear of any dangerous hazards at 1:00 pm by an older employee
Premium Tort Law Reasonable person
Introduction In the condom industry‚ it cannot be denied that one of the world leading company name “Durex” will always be on the top ranked in almost every competition and survey. The UK based condom company has been manufactory condom for nearly 80 years and is not only the condom manufactory company but also provide the well being products such as cream‚ lotion‚ and vibrator. In 1915‚ “LA Jackson” founded The London Rubber Company‚ which providing barbershop supply and imported condom supply
Premium Condom Durex Human penis size
3112IBA Tutorial Discussion Preparation Sheet Case: ...... Navitas vs. Kaplan .... Key facts of the case: Navitas business strategy has changed over time from a narrow focus on pathway education for international students into universities in Australia ‚ it wants to grow and be profitable (it is a listed company but no specific growth rate is mentioned); its services are programs either leading to or within higher education in English-speaking countries. Its customers are students‚ particularly
Premium Higher education Student University