Cross Linking effects on Polymers Purpose To observe the properties of the polymers with different amount of borax to see the effects of cross linking. Question How does the amount of a cross linking substances affect physical properties of a polymer Experimental Design A polymer was made with precise measuring of all the reactants especially different measurements of Borax solution as it was the key to cross linking. Physical properties of all the polymers were observed and the role of
Premium Polymer Measurement Liquid
Simulation of the Coiling of a polymer strand Tsvetoslav Pavlov Department of Materials‚ Imperial College London‚ United Kingdom 27th Feb 2012 1. Abstract This study will examine the temperature dependence of internal energy‚ heat capacity and R2 value (representative of the end to end distance) using a Langevin Dynamics simulation. It will also consider the dependence of the internal energy‚ heat capacity and R2 value with increasing polymer chain length. Internal energy has been found
Premium Standard deviation Energy
Brandenburg v. Ohio The Supreme Court uses various criteria for the consideration of cases. Not all cases may be chosen by the Supreme Court‚ so they must wisely choose their cases. The Court must be uniform and consistent with the cases they choose according to federal law. "Supreme Court Rule 17‚ Considerations Governing Review on Certiorari ’" (Rossum 28).These rules are obligatory to follow because the Court uses it to grant certiorari. There are four basic rules for Rule 17. First‚ the
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Mapp v. Ohio (1962) i. Plaintiff‚ Dollree Mapp‚ was illegally raided by Cleveland police. After receiving information that an individual‚ wanted in connection with a recent bombing‚ was hiding in Mapp’s house‚ the Cleveland police knocked on her door and demanded entrance. On the other hand‚ the defendant was the state of Ohio. The police were looking for a bombing suspect and during the search found a gun and obscene literature. ii. On May 23‚ 1957‚ police officers in Cleveland‚ Ohio believed that
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Exclusionary rule Police
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Criminal Procedure and the Constitution September 13‚ 2012 Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Facts: In Mapp v. Ohio (1961)‚ the police thought Dollree Mapp was hiding a suspect they were looking for in connection with building a bomb. The police officers lied and said they had a search warrant of which they did not and forced their way into Mapp’s home and searched it. While searching the home‚ the police found evidence‚ not for a bomb‚ but of pornographic material that violated
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Mapp v. Ohio On May 23‚ 1957‚ police officers in a Cleveland‚ Ohio suburb received information that a suspect of a bombing case‚ as well as some illegal betting equipment‚ might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Three officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter‚ but Mapp refused to let them in without a search warrant. Two officers left‚ and one remained. Three hours later‚ the two returned with several other officers with a piece of paper and broke in the door. Mapp asked
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Terry v. Ohio‚ 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Facts of the Case An police officer by the name of Mcfadden observed two men standing at a street corner. He noticed that the two men would take turns on looking inside of the window store. This happenedd about twenty four times and each time they did it the two men would have a conversation. After a while a third guy had joined the duo and then left. After the detective witnessed that action he had suspected that they were casing the store to burglarize the
Premium Terry v. Ohio United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Lakisha Frasier Leg 420 Assignment 2: Terry V. Ohio 392 U.S. 1‚ 88 S. Ct. 1868‚ 20 L. ED. 2d 889‚ 1968 U.S. March 1‚ 2015 I will be summarizing the aspects of Terry v Ohio case‚ discussing whether or not the men’s right to privacy was violated as well as the officer’s action described and the courts holding that provides the totality of the circumstances. John W. Terry (the “Petitioner”)‚ was stopped and searched after seemingly casing a store for robbery. Terry was approached by the
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Law
is the following : { NH – (CH2)5 – CO }n and M = 113 g/mol PD = 60‚000 / 113 = 531 The repeat unit of Nylon 6‚6 ( polyhexamethyleneadipate ) is : { OC(O) – (CH2)4 – CO – NH – (CH2)6 – NH } and M = 226 g/mol PD = 60‚000 / 214 = 265 -a) The polymer formed by the polycondensation of 2 moles of terephtalic acid and 2 moles ethyleneglycol is poly(ethyleneterephtalate) with the following repeat unit : { OC – C6H4 – C(O)O – CH2 – CH2 – O }n and M = 192/2 = 96
Premium Polymer
What is the biggest issue that needs to be addressed in Ohio? In this year’s November election‚ Ohio voters will have the opportunity to vote on three different issues that affect the state. The first issue is redistricting‚ the second is monopoly prevention‚ and the third is legalization of marijuana. While each issue is different‚ issues 2 and 3 have potential to have direct effects on each other‚ and may cause problems. Each issue is important and should be understood by voters before they make
Premium United States Elections Voting