Harvard Business School 9-793-039 Rev. January 20‚ 1998 DO Nucor at a Crossroads On December 7‚ 1986‚ F. Kenneth Iverson‚ chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) of Nucor Corporation‚ awaited a delegation from SMS Schloemann-Siemag‚ a leading West German supplier of steelmaking equipment‚ at his company’s headquarters in Charlotte‚ North Carolina. Iverson had to decide whether to commit Nucor to a new steel mill that would commercialize thinslab casting technology developed by SMS
Premium Steel Steelmaking Pig iron
NUCOR MEMORANDUM To: F. Kenneth Iverson and Management Team of Nucor Corporation CC: AGSM Faculty Teams Subject: Investment Decision Date: 04/22/2009 From: 1713898 The Situation In 1986‚ flat sheet segment contained 52% of US total steel market1. Nucor Corporation‚ which is a steel minimill well-known for its leadership‚ efficient operation and well-structured compensation‚ is showing the interest in the flat sheet segment. At the same time‚ there are many new thin-slab casting technologies to
Premium Costs Barriers to entry Strategic management
Case Study: Nucor Steel Corporation. Nucor Corporation is characterized by its owner‐operators who take pride in their work and teams and as a result have created great profitability for a traditional steelmaker. Nucor is known for many things including its pay practices that base earnings on performance as well as the value and trust the corporation places in its employees. At Nucor employees are rewarded based on their effort‚ treated with great respect and empowered to make decisions based on
Premium Leadership
March 13‚ 2014 SUBJECT: Should Nucor Adopt the CSP Process? Cash Flow Analysis Cash flow analysis on Exhibit 1 represents net cash flow calculation using the base assumption. According to this calculation‚ Nucor would have net present value of $(11.99) million which is a negative value. This negative value on NPV indicates potential unprofitable consequences after implementing SMS’s compact strip production (CSP); therefore‚ Nucor should not invest in this new technology.
Premium Net present value Cash flow
NUCOR CASE In this analysis we use the Net present value to consider if Nucor should invest in the new technology called: thin slab minimill. NPV is really useful in order to make this kind of decision because it uses the concept of future cash value to evaluate whether the investment is worth‚ however the NPV is sometimes difficult to calculate because it is not always easy to estimate future cash flow. Considering the assumption I made in the first part of the spread sheet‚ the thin slab project
Premium Net present value Investment Discounted cash flow
4. What type of strategy has Nucor followed? Which of the five generic strategies discussed in Chapter 5 is Nucor employing? Is there any reason to believe that Nucor has achieved a sustainable competitive advantage over many of its steel industry rivals? Is so‚ what type of competitive advantage does Nucor enjoy? Since F. Kenneth Iverson took the role of CEO at Nucor‚ he guided the company to work under a focused low-cost leadership strategy‚ with great focus in high quality and employing state-of-the-art
Premium Recyclable materials Steel Investment
Evaluación Estratégica de Proyectos "Caso Nucor" _Evaluación Tradicional y Estratégica de Proyectos._ INDICE 21. OBJETIVOS DEL INFORME 2. ANTECEDENTES DE NUCOR 2 3. EVALUACIÓN TRADICIONAL 2 3.1. ANÁLISIS DE SENSIBILIDAD EVALUACIÓN TRADICIONAL. 4 4. EVALUACIÓN ESTRATÉGICA. 5 4.1. ÁRBOL DE DECISIONES 6 4.2. ANÁLISIS DE SENSIBILIDAD EVALUACIÓN ESTRATÉGICA. 6 5. ANÁLISIS DE RESULTADOS 7 6. CONCLUSIONES/RECOMENDACIONES. 9 7. REFERENCIAS 10 8. ANEXOS: 11 8.1. FLUJO DE CAJA PLANTA 1 11 8
Premium Individuo Conocimiento
Nucor at a Crossroads MGMT XXXX-XXX Nucor’s Historic Performance‚ Competitive Advantage‚ and Five Forces Analysis With roots dating back to 1904 in the automobile manufacturing industry‚ Nucor’s business strategy has morphed many times over the course of the past century in response to struggling sales and unrealized business strategies. Since F. Kenneth Iverson’s appointment as Nucor’s President in 1965‚ however‚ Nucor has performed very well. With a focus on efficiency‚ Nucor
Premium Steel Steelmaking
Nucor at a Crossroads Nucor at a Crossroads Case Analysis In 1986‚ three distinct segments defined the U.S. steel industry; integrated steel mills‚ mini-mills‚ and specialty steel makers. The integrated mills have the capacity to produce a maximum of 107 million tons of steel per year‚ mini-mills produced a maximum of 21 million tons of capacity a year‚ and the nation’s specialty steel makers could produce a maximum capacity of 5 million tons of stainless and specialty grades of steel. This leads
Premium Steel Barriers to entry
Nucor Steel Case Analysis Questions 1. Do a five-forces (Porter) analysis of the competitive forces impacting the U.S. Steel industry. Does your analysis support Nucor’s current basic business model? The competitive forces impacting the U.S. Steel industry are that the buyers have the majority of the bargaining power‚ there are only a few suppliers‚ the internal rivalry is intense because of the price wars and lack of differentiated products‚ there aren’t any substitutes for steel‚ and there
Premium Revenue Strategic management United States