Competition As a leader of the sports and athletic apparel industry‚ Nike competes directly with Adidas‚ Under Armor‚ Puma‚ and New Balance for market share and position. Nike is currently the top producer in this industry. Currently‚ Nike holds 53.94% of the market. Nike currently owns close to 700 retail stores‚ and they sell their products to more than 23‚000 distributors worldwide. Nike aims to generate $28 to $38 billion in revenue by 2015 through their continued sales of their most popular
Premium United States Athletic shoe Adidas
and contrasting is both Nike and Adidas sportswear companies. Whose products throughout many parts of the world are very popular and have been the top two leading sport companies in the sport industry. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast Nike and Adidas companies in terms of headquarters‚ market focus‚ sponsorships‚ marketing and advertising‚ price and product. Nike and Adidas are the most popular sporting attires out in the clothing and equipment market. Nike and Adidas offer people
Premium Sport Athletic shoe Nike, Inc.
strategies of sport companies for Nike and Adidas. Introduction My area of study for this project would be more on comparing the performances for Nike and Adidas for the past 5 years. In this project I would explain the performance such as growth in profits‚ revenues‚ market share‚ the company employers and employees‚ size of the market share‚ steps for increasing the social performance‚ products performance‚ dividends per share‚ assets and the company investment. Nike and Adidas and have been the top
Premium Nike, Inc. Adidas Sport
Swot analysis NIKE 1. Strenghts: -Low manufacturing cost since the manufacturing chain comes from south Asia were labor costs are low. -Since Nike does not own the physical factories‚ production can be switch to another location if necessary. -Nike wass worth 15 billion in 2011. They have a strong position in the shoe market. For example their gem ’’Just do it" has been recognized worldwide. - High return on equity up to 24.5 % in 1993. Although the return on equity was 21.41 %‚ it still
Premium Brand Supply and demand Minimum wage
Joanna Cohen’s WACC calculation because she mistakenly used historical data to estimate the future cost of debt. Joanna calculated the cost of debt by taking the interest expense for 2001 and dividing it by the average debt balance. The cost of debt for Nike is the effective rate that it pays on its current debt‚ meaning the yield to maturity of bonds should be used to make an estimate instead of the average debt balance. Through the use of past data‚ the average balance of debt‚ the 4.3% before-tax cost
Premium Arithmetic mean Interest Stock
Nike’s pricing Strategies 20 Price versus Promotion Matrix 21 Price versus Quality Matrix 22 Place (Distribution) 23 Nike -Direct Marketing 24 Nike - Indirect Marketing (Wholesalers & Retailers) 25 Value added services – Intermediaries 25 Distribution strategies 25 Promotion 26 Nike’s promotional strategies 27 Communication Model 28 SWOT ANALYSIS OF NIKE INCORPORATED 30 Strengths: 30 Strong Brand Image 30 Supplier Diversity 30 High Growth 31 Weakness: 31 Recent Setbacks
Premium Marketing Nike, Inc.
Globalization and Nike‚ Inc. Industry Overview The athletic footwear industry has experienced significant growth over the last two decades. Since 2001‚ consumers in the United States have spent more than $13 billion and have purchased over 300 million pair of athletic shoes. While the industry is highly segmented by sport category‚ models and price‚ a few large players dominate the branded shoe segment. The top ten-footwear companies control over 70 percent of the market share for global athletic
Premium World Trade Organization Athletic shoe International trade
MARKETING EXCELLENCE- NIKE The case explains how Nike successfully marketed it products by getting it endorsed through top athletes‚ who influence the buying decision of brands and products of others and created its brand image by associating the products with their persona. By signing the Michael Jordan and relating it air Jordan shoes to his superior performance ‚it generated great revenues in a year alone‚ and its “just do it” ad campaign manifested brand’s attitude of self-empowerment through
Premium Marketing Michael Jordan
UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA KELP Sushi Joint: Crisis Management Owner is arrested‚ joint is closed! MKT500‚ Section N‚ Spring 2014 5/1/2014 The professor reserves the right to retain and publish students’ work for pedagogical purposes‚ and student hereby acknowledges this right and waives any rights to the work. Carley Donovan Pavneet Kohli Stephen Reyes Magdalena Simic Table of Contents Author’s Notes 3 1 Abstract 5 2 Objectives 5 3 Process 5 4 Relevant Theory
Premium Sushi Management Crisis management
Nike hit the ground running in 1962. Originally known as Blue Ribbon Sports‚ the company focused on providing high-quality running shoes designed especially for athletes by athletes. Founder Philip Knight believed that high-tech shoes for runners could be manufactured at competitive prices if imported from abroad. The company’s commitment to designing innovative footwear for serious athletes helped it build a cult following among American consumers. By 1980‚ Nike had become the number-one athletic
Premium Nike, Inc.