Product Liability Research Paper Shericia Bonnett Professor Kapalko LEG 500 – Law and Ethics In the Business Environment 09/09/2012 Consumers use a variety of products on a daily basis to assist them in accomplishing a task or completing a project and they expect the product to be properly designed and safe to use. However‚ in the event that a product is defective and causes injury to the person using it‚ the manufacturer may be liable for the injury and have to compensate the injured
Premium Management Risk Marketing
1. I believe there are 3 theories that relate to product liability in which Kolchek could sue to recover for Litishas’s injuries. They are; + Product liability based on misrepresentation because the misrepresentation is of a material fact‚ and the seller intended to induce the buyer’s reliance on the misrepresentation. +Product Liability based on negligence because there clearly a failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable‚ prudent person would have exercised under the circumstance
Premium Law Tort Tort law
Before 1932 there was no generalised duty of care in negligence. The tort did exist and was applied in particular situations where the courts had decided that a duty should be owed‚ eg‚ road accidents‚ bailments or dangerous goods. In Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562‚ Lord Atkin attempted to lay down a general principle which would cover all the circumstances where the courts had already held that there could be liability for negligence. He said: "The rule that you are to love your neighbour
Premium Tort Duty of care Negligence
the jury was satisfied that his negligence was gross." Per Judge LJ R. v. Misra and Srivastava [2004] EWCA Crim 2375 para 64 (in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) In light of the above comments‚ consider the elements of the offence of Gross Negligence Manslaughter and‚ referring to relevant authority‚ critically assess whether the current law in this area is certain and satisfactory. This paper is going to consider elements of the offence of Gross Negligence Manslaughter and will assess
Premium Law Common law Duty of care
Current Liabilities Week 3 Assignment Beverly Clarkson November 23‚ 2014 Daniel Carraher RUNNING HEAD: CURRENT LIABILITIES Current Liabilities Current liabilities
Premium Balance sheet Accounts receivable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
A2 law: tort: Vicarious Liability Question 2-Fairness/Unfairness. Vicarious liability arises when one party is responsible for the tort of another. This situation occurs frequently when an employer is held responsible for the torts committed by an employee. An employer can only be held responsible for the torts of an employee‚ not for an independent contractor. There are also some rules that must be satisfied. First it must be proven that the tortfeaser is an employee. The act the tortfeaser
Premium Employment Tort law Strict liability
Medical Negligence‚ Malpractices‚ Law and Bangladesh Perspective Back in 1992 there were hardly any private medical hospitals in Bangladesh. Standard of medical treatments were comparatively lower than now it is but it was at least at the standard as expected from the available expertise and technologies. This is 2012‚ and it is expected that the standard of medical treatment would grow up significantly. During 80’s- 90’s we used to see news of malpractices of so called ‘doctor’ only in villages
Premium Physician Medicine Doctor Who
two principles of criminal liability which have to be relied upon in order to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused person. Therefore the aim of this essay is to discuss the two principles of law for criminal liability with reference to the Penal Code Act‚ Chapter Eighty Seven (87) of the Laws of Zambia and Zambian decided cases. In order to effectively do this‚ the essay will begin by generally talking about the two principles of law for criminal liability which are the “Actus reus”
Premium Criminal law Crime Actus reus
Contributory and Comparative Negligence Contributory and comparative negligence are legal concepts that are slightly similar in meaning. These are two separate legal concepts that minimize the liability of the defendant (McWay‚ 2010). The biggest difference between the two is that with comparative negligence there is usually some type of monetary compensation. But with contributory negligence‚ there won’t usually be any type of monetary compensation. Contributory negligence is when one person brings
Premium Tort law Tort Contributory negligence
Legal studies Introduction Negligence is a failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or loss to another person (Law Hand Book‚ 2013). Negligence can be used when a party has experienced loss or damage from the wrongful actions or omission to act of another individual. This principal can be found in The Civil Liability Act 2003(Qld). The following report will examine the tort of negligence While analyzing the case study of Mr. Jones vs Blue Board Production and will provide an evaluation
Premium Law Negligence Tort law