IN THE COURT OF 1st CLASS CIVIL JUDGE‚ LAHORE The Aga Khan Hospital and Medical College Foundation VERSUS Mr. Bashir Ahmad WRITTEN STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT Respectfully Sheweth: Preliminary Objections 1. That the Plaintiff has not properly authorized Mr. Sherali Razwani S/O Ferozeali Razwani and Mrs. Shagufta Shamsuddin Hassan W/O Shamsuddin Sadruddin Hassan to file this suit. Hence‚ the Plaint is liable to be dismissed. 2. That the plaint is defective on the grounds
Premium Plaintiff Civil procedure Pleading
Defendant ’s Opening Statement May it please the court. It was a peaceful Saturday morning in April. Just last spring. In Shamrock University Law School ’s classroom building. Our hallways were quiet and our classrooms were almost empty. And then‚ in a student courtroom‚ something happened that astonished everyone. The plaintiff‚ Judge John Birdsong‚ pointed a .357 magnum pistol near his leg‚ pulled the trigger‚ not once‚ but‚ twice‚ to see if the gun was loaded‚ and shot himself in the left leg
Premium Law Gun Lawyer
these people have already agreed to be witnesses on my behalf and I expect you to utilize them effectively in my defense. 35. I demand the right to face my accuser. I require you to demand that the alleged child witness be available to testify in court we be allowed to examine them prior to trial and I require you to obtain all of their medical records‚ psychological records‚ social services records‚ etc. Be aware that they will not fully disclose all information under services records‚ etc. Be aware
Premium Jury Testimony Lawyer
MEMORIAL ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Sr. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Abbreviated Forms FDI AIR SC SCC Edn. v. Pg. Hon‟ble Art. UOI Vol. U.S.A. Full Forms Foreign Direct Investment All India Reporter Supreme Court Supreme Court Cases Edition Versus Pages Honourable Article Union of India Volume United State of America MEMORIAL ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER Page 2 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES BOOKS REFERRED: 1. Jain M.P.‚ Indian Constitutional Law‚ (Nagpur: LexisNexis Butterworths
Premium India Constitution of India Human rights
In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Eric Pollard (Appellant) -v- Viv Windsor (Respondent) Viv has just bought “The Village Shop” and‚ anxious to please the locals‚ decides to put an advertisement in the local paper stating that she will sell boxes of luxury chocolate shortbread at a discount price of £2.50‚ instead of the recommended retail price of £5.00. It also states that there are only 50 boxes available. Viv has recently bought a computer from her son‚ Scottt‚ to help her with the running
Premium Contract Price Pricing
www.bbc.co.uk/languages/ ------------------------------------------------- IN THE HON’BLE DISTRICT COURT OF AHMEDABAD‚ MISTY (Appellant) V. ------------------------------------------------- PIMPLE BEN ------------------------------------------------- (Respondent) ------------------------------------------------- INTRA CLASS MOOT COURT COMPETITION ------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Mihir Narvilkar – 11BAL047 Manisha Navlani – 11BAL048 -------------------------------------------------
Free Marriage
Olympus V. DeNolf‚ Jr. – Majority Opinion THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ---------------------- No. 2009-3280 ---------------------- State of Olympus v. William DeNolf‚ Jr. ------------------------------------------------------------------- On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Court of the State of Olympus ------------------------------------------------------------------ Argued and Submitted February 19‚ 2013. The Petitioner incorrectly applied Katz
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Team 11C 3rd National Law School International Arbitration Moot Court Competition‚ 2010 Court of International Arbitration‚ Gregaria City‚ Gregaria Mallory Advisory Services Ltd.………………………………………………………Claimant v. Shawcross Solutions Pvt. Ltd…………………………………………………….Respondent 1 Comet (Shawcross) Solutions Pvt. Ltd…………………………………………...Respondent 2 (Arb/Cas/0410/2009) Memorandum for Claimant Table of Contents Table of Contents i Table of Abbreviations iv Index of Authorities
Premium Contract Arbitration
------------------------------------------------- Top of Form | | MANU/SC/0092/1986Equivalent Citation: I(1987)ACC157‚ 1987ACJ386‚ AIR1987SC1086‚ (1987)1CompLJ99(SC)‚ JT1987(1)SC1‚ 1986(2)SCALE1188‚ (1987)1SCC395‚ 1986Supp(1)SCC562‚ [1987]1SCR819IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIAWrit Petition (Civil) No. 12739 of 1985Decided On: 20.12.1986Appellants: M.C. Mehta and another Vs. Respondent: Union of India and othersHon’ble Judges: G. L. Oza‚ K. N. Singh‚ M. M. Dutt‚ P. N. Bhagwati and Ranganath Misra‚ JJ.Counsels:
Free United States Constitution
which the shop was closed for trading. The law in question must therefore consider if the remained open until the last day of March or the offer did in fact finish on the last day of trading in march‚ which would have been Friday the 30th. The Court of Appeal Case of Dickson and Dodds as reported in ********* held that if an offer clearly states it is open until a certain date‚ it may be withdrawn at any point prior to that date. Following the rule‚ the shop sign therefore clearly states ‘offer
Premium Contract