RGNUL FRESHERS INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2013 IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT NEW ZELHI‚ STATE OF SFORZA CASE CONCERNING CONSUMER DISPUTE BETWEEN MR. LORENZO AND XONDA AUTOMOBILES MR. LORENZO ...PETITIONER VERSUS XONDA AUTOMOBILES …RESPONDENT ON THE SUBMISSION TO THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION -MEMORIAL OF THE PETITIONER- STATEMENT OF FACTS .Mr. Lorenzo is an investment banker working for the Medici Bank in New Zelhi‚ capital
Premium House of Medici State Manufacturing
5th Inter Year Moot Court Competition‚ 2015 Dhaka University Moot Court Society (DUMCS) Arash Housing Ltd. represented by Sadman Khan vs. Nibash Housing Ltd. represented by Aziz Ahmed and others 1. Mr. Aziz Ahmed is a land owner and a developer having real estate business. He is also the Managing Director of ‘Nibash Housing Ltd.’ having power to deal with every matter of the company.Every year this company makes a profit of around tk. 50 million. This company is well reputed for its fulfillment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Contract Supreme court
How to Prepare Oral Argument (The text is quoted from Duke Law School Moot Court Board’s website with minor modifications) For anyone unfamiliar with the in’s and out’s of Jessup moot court oral argument‚ the following is a useful guide. For further guidance‚ you may view a video recording of past Jessup moot court competition. Structure & Sequence 1. Opening Competitors may be seated after the judges sit down. When the judges indicate that they are ready‚ the student should rise and
Premium Question Logic Judge
MOOT COURT PROBLEM 172109831117 IN THE HONOURABLE MOOT COURT/HIGH COURT OF A.P UNDER APPELLETE JURISDICTION (CIVIL APPEAL NO: 2012) BETWEEN: SUJATHA---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPELLENT AND
Premium Marriage
UQ Moot Court Bench Mooting Manual Contents Page Introduction.......................................................................................... 2 Approaching a Moot Problem .............................................................. 2 Researching the Problem .................................................................... 3 Written Submissions............................................................................ 4 The Oral Element of the Moot...............................
Premium Law Common law
Jeremy Cooper Moot Court 1 The Constitutionality of the “Slave trade Act” The question before the Court is the constitutionality of the Slave Trade Act. The bill was first proposed by Congressman Weber in 1858 in an attempt to prohibit the sale of slaves in the United States. The bill was passed into law in the spring of 1859. The petitioner congressman Ryan Suter‚ argues that the Slave Trade Act is unconstitutional. According to the court Suter argues “slaves are likened to property‚ the
Premium United States Constitution Commerce Clause United States Congress
FIRST MOOT COURT CASE IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY IN THE MATTER OF SUNITA ………..PETITIONER Vs. UKO Bank ………..RESPONDENT COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT Most Respectfully Submitted to the Hon’ble Judge of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay At Bombay TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INDEX OF AUTHORITIES 2. REFERENCE 3. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 4. STATEMENT
Premium Criminal law Tort Tort law
Moot Court Competn-2008-Case ICSI CORPORATE LAW MOOT COURT PROBLEM 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI C.P.No: 36 of 2007 Paolo Luscini & Co. (PL) …… Petitioners V RELIVE CO. LTD …… Respondent 1. RELIVE CO.LTD was incorporated in the year 1971 in the State of Maharashtra with the object of carrying on the business of media and telecommunications. The paid-up share capital of the company was 130 million comprising of 13 million shares of Rs. 10 each. The Company initially
Premium Money Stock Balance sheet
MOOT PROBLEM Jitender Sharma was a young boy of 18 years of age. He fell in love with Poonam Sharma who was a girl of 16 years of age. One day they eloped from their respective homes and finally got married as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Poonam’s family members were against this marriage. Even her Grand Father and Paternal uncle were not ready to accept this marriage at any cost. They threatened Poonam of her life and safety. Thereafter Poonam’s father lodge First Information Report (FIR) against
Premium Marriage Delhi
DEPARTMENT OF LAW " MOOT COURT MEMORIAL" written submission on behalf of counsel for prosecution MOOT COURT MEMORIAL Submitted by : XXX Class :LLB xxx Sem Roll No:XXX Teacher Incharge XXXXXXXXXXX
Premium Crime Judge Lawyer