The legal issue in this problem is whether the acceptance of the offer by Shum is made before communication of the revocation by Tam. A statement of sales offering to a specific person by one body is considered as an offer. In this case‚ Tam has sent a letter to Shum offering to sell him a quantity of household goods for HK$10‚000. Therefore‚ an offer by Tam has been made on 15th January. (the date that Shum receives Tam’s letter). According to The General Rule‚ an acceptance must be communicated
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance
5.2.1 Standing In law‚ standing is the term for the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party’s participation in the case. When it comes to the right of standing in cases related to patented technology‚ it becomes more complicated than just being able to prove that the infringement harms the party‚ he should also have all the rights of the patented technology to be eligible to sue. Let us suppose a researcher
Premium Law Patent Common law
In addition‚ the premium beer market is expanding tremendously which is where Interbrew’s products are placed. Having a globally recognized beer that is produced in this growing field would be very profitable. 2)When it was decided by Interbrew Brewing Company to develop a global beer it was no surprise that they chose their best selling local beer‚ Stella Artois. Stella Artois is their oldest beer and was a local leader in Interbrew’s home market in Belgium. The most conclusive way to establish
Premium Advertising Marketing
Case Study I Strategic Issues in the United Kingdom (UK) Brewing Industry Submitted by Strategic Issues in the United Kingdom (UK) Brewing Industry 1- From the information collected on the brewing industry‚ suggest at least two possible research questions. The first possible research question is: What is the relationship between acquisitions and mergers among the companies in the United Kingdom (UK) brewing industry and the profit margins of the companies? The second
Premium Scientific method United Kingdom Research
Target for Lite (1970): 21-34 year old males with blue-collar occupations‚ who were the heavy users of the beer category Insight for Lite (1970): Heavy users of beer (from the above demographic segment) prefer a beer that they can enjoy more of while not compromising on the taste. Position for Lite (1970): Great tasting beer that had fewer calories and doesn’t fill you up Promotion strategy (1970): Advertising on television during sports programming with ex-athletes and other beer-drinking
Premium Marketing
property OR (2) appropriate the property to his or her won use or to the use of any person not entitled to the use of the property. In addition‚ it is a felony‚ as well as grand theft‚ of the third degree if the property stolen falls under one of 14 qualifications‚ one of which is a stop sign. In the time between the last week of January and the first week of February‚ after a night of hanging out with friends‚ our client‚ Thomas Miller‚ along with co-defendants‚ Chris Cole and Nissa Baille‚ went on
Premium Traffic sign Evidence Witness
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 81-1505 Transamerica Oil Corporation‚ Plaintiff-Appellee‚ v. Lynes‚ Inc. and Baker International Corporation‚ Defendants-Appellants. 723F.2d 758; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14288; 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1076 ------------------------------------------------- December 21‚ 1983 PROCEDURAL POSTURE Plaintiff brought suit under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to recover damages resulting from the breach of an
Premium Warranty Appeal Jury
have been many Supreme Court cases that dealed with many concepts of the law‚ like obscenity for example. As a matter of fact‚ obscenity is a concept that Miller v. California deals with. To be more specific‚ this case deals with what is considered obscene‚ and if the specific obscenity mentioned in this case is protected by the first amendment‚ the freedom of speech. I will now explain this case in more depth. What brought this case about? In 1973‚ Marvin Miller‚ operator of one of the West
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Obscenity Supreme Court of the United States
Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Nevada‚ 1996991 P. 2d 1183People in the United States commit crimes and make up excuses why they should not be held accountable for a crime. Insanity and temporary Insanity have significant differences. One might ask themselves is there really any meaningful difference? During the history of our court system there has been many significant court decisions which address the controversy topics of insanity and temporary insanity as it relates to criminal procedures. One
Premium Insanity defense Law Mental disorder
ALICE M. BATCHELDER‚ Circuit Judge. Page 807 512 F.3d 807 (6th Cir. 2008) 85 U.S.P.Q.2d 1481 NCR CORPORATION‚ Plaintiff-Appellant‚ v. KORALA ASSOCIATES LTD.‚ Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-3685. United States Court of Appeals‚ Sixth Circuit. Jan. 16‚ 2008 Argued: Feb. 1‚ 2007. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Dayton. No. 04-00407-Michael R. Merz‚ Magistrate Judge. Page 808 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Page 809 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Page 810
Premium Automated teller machine Supreme Court of the United States Copyright infringement