Critical Thinking Stanley Milgram Experiment I feel the reason the Milgram Experiment subjects were lacking the moral and critical thinking of how they reacted to the experiment was a multitude of things such as. The subjects felt they had to because they were being told to by “people of authority” They also felt that since they were participating in the experiment and they were only doing “as told” then they were okay to proceed. Some also stated that do to the trust they had for the school and
Free Psychology Stanford prison experiment Thought
Stanley Milgram‚ a famous social psychologist‚ and student of Solomon Asch‚ conducted a controversial experiment in 1961‚ investigating obedience to authority. The experiment was held to see if a subject would do something an authority figure tells them‚ even if it conflicts with their personal beliefs and morals. This experiment brought uproar amongst the psychological world and caused the code of ethics to be reviewed and ultimately changed. In the experiment subjects were asked to administer
Free Psychology Stanford prison experiment Stanley Milgram
UNIT 2 THE FOUR (4) MAJOR PARENTING STYLES According to psychologist Diana Baumrind there are four parenting styles; Authoritarian‚ Authoritative‚ Permissive and Uninvolved parenting. Baumrind studied how these parenting styles impacted a child’s development. • Authoritarian Parenting – this type of parent is demanding but not responsive‚ children are expected to follow the strict rules and parents fail to explain their reasons behind their rules and might just reply by saying‚ “Because I said
Free Parenting styles
Stanley Milgram conducted an examination‚ in the 60’s‚ based on the justification for the acts of genocide offered by those who were accused in the Nuremberg War Criminal Trials of WWII. Their defense‚ as they claimed was solely based on “obedience” and that they were in fact only following their superior’s orders. This eventually led to the study on the conflict between obedience toward authority and one’s personal conscious. His experiment was a model of simplicity. The idea was to take an ‘experimenter’
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
The ethical violations found in the original experiment (1962) included participants (teacher) giving other participants (learner) dangerous electrical shocks at a very high voltage increasing all the way up to 450 volts. The experimenter (authority) informed both the teacher and the learner participants that although the volts may be painful‚ they are not dangerous. Even though the “teacher” could hear the “learner” yell and scream as they got shocked each time‚ the “teacher” continued with the
Premium Experiment Psychology Stanford prison experiment
1. What does Milgram’s study tell us about human behaviour? Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted the Milgram experiment‚ study to see the participants’ willingness to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that differed with their conscience. The study is used to show the aim that Stanley Milgram himself placed to see the willingness of the participant to obey use pain if one of the participants got an answer wrong. Overall‚ 65% of the participants gave
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
The Obedience theory by Stanley Milgram is an important exploration conducted over the years and retested by several social psychologists‚ different participants were asked to shock another human being or defy authority. Milgram’s research on obedience to authority figures was a series of social psychology experiments conducted at Yale university. This paper discuses Milgram’s Life’s work and his life as a social psychologist. The investigation conducted‚ the results of the sais experiment and the
Premium Social psychology Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
Describe and discuss two factors that Milgram found effect obedience? Refer to empirical evidence in your answer Milgram’s original study into obedience came under to a lot of scrutiny because of both mythological and ethical problems. This meant that the validity of Milgram’s study was put into question. Following the study were further investigations to see what might change and explain the results that Milgram found‚ both by Milgram himself and other psychologists. Variations to his study throw
Premium Scientific method Research Quantitative research
Milgram Obedience Study In May of 1962 Stanley Milgram‚ a Social Psychologist at Yale University‚ conducted a study on “Obedience and Human Nature” that was influenced by his curiosity of the WWII German Nazi Holocaust and concentration camps. Milgram asked “How could it be‚ that ordinary German people could allow the extermination of the Jews” and wanted to know under what circumstances would a person disobey authority? The study took place in the greater New Haven area and consisted
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Stanley Milgram
companies and individuals are the minority. Every individual can stomp his feet and stand on his soap box and say how he would’ve acted differently if he was placed in the aforementioned individuals’ shoes‚ but that cannot be determined. Conversely‚ the Milgram experiment‚ however controversial‚ proves that a vast majority of people‚ in the right circumstances‚ will physically harm another person based on the orders of a superior. It is hard to refute scientific evidence and statistics. To further this‚
Premium Stanford prison experiment Human Psychology