The ethical violations found in the original experiment (1962) included participants (teacher) giving other participants (learner) dangerous electrical shocks at a very high voltage increasing all the way up to 450 volts. The experimenter (authority) informed both the teacher and the learner participants that although the volts may be painful‚ they are not dangerous. Even though the “teacher” could hear the “learner” yell and scream as they got shocked each time‚ the “teacher” continued with the
Premium Experiment Psychology Stanford prison experiment
1. What does Milgram’s study tell us about human behaviour? Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted the Milgram experiment‚ study to see the participants’ willingness to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that differed with their conscience. The study is used to show the aim that Stanley Milgram himself placed to see the willingness of the participant to obey use pain if one of the participants got an answer wrong. Overall‚ 65% of the participants gave
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
The Obedience theory by Stanley Milgram is an important exploration conducted over the years and retested by several social psychologists‚ different participants were asked to shock another human being or defy authority. Milgram’s research on obedience to authority figures was a series of social psychology experiments conducted at Yale university. This paper discuses Milgram’s Life’s work and his life as a social psychologist. The investigation conducted‚ the results of the sais experiment and the
Premium Social psychology Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
Milgram Obedience Study In May of 1962 Stanley Milgram‚ a Social Psychologist at Yale University‚ conducted a study on “Obedience and Human Nature” that was influenced by his curiosity of the WWII German Nazi Holocaust and concentration camps. Milgram asked “How could it be‚ that ordinary German people could allow the extermination of the Jews” and wanted to know under what circumstances would a person disobey authority? The study took place in the greater New Haven area and consisted
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Stanley Milgram
companies and individuals are the minority. Every individual can stomp his feet and stand on his soap box and say how he would’ve acted differently if he was placed in the aforementioned individuals’ shoes‚ but that cannot be determined. Conversely‚ the Milgram experiment‚ however controversial‚ proves that a vast majority of people‚ in the right circumstances‚ will physically harm another person based on the orders of a superior. It is hard to refute scientific evidence and statistics. To further this‚
Premium Stanford prison experiment Human Psychology
that is why I believe authority is a necessary element for the prosperity of a society. However‚ I have never expected that authority has such thorough effect on human that it even overwhelms people’s fundamental moral standards until I watched the Milgram experiment during the first lecture. The result of the experiment was very shocking to me – over half of the subjects would keep shocking the ‘learners’ until the end just because the experimenters required them to do so‚ even though the learners
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
Kayla McNutt Professor Williams English 1101-107 17 September 2013 The Obedience Test Stanley Milgram’s article‚ “The Perils of Obedience” focuses on the experiment he created to test society’s willingness to obey. In the experiment Milgram has one person who is a learner and another who delivers the shocks‚ the teacher. The focus of the experiment is on the person delivering the shocks because the “learner” is an actor. The learner’s role is to recite words to practice memorization.
Premium Stanford prison experiment Shock Milgram experiment
Milgram (1963) Past-paper Questions 1. In the Milgram study on obedience‚ the subjects were observed to show a lot of tension. a. Give one example of the behaviour of the subjects that indicated extreme tension. (2) Any one from: Fidgeting‚ agitation‚ asking if learner was being harmed‚ trying to stop‚ pausing. b. Milgram suggested that the tension was caused by the conflicts produced by the study. Outline one of these conflicts. (2) One
Premium Psychology Social psychology Milgram experiment
The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible things. The test is to see if someone would do an awful act just on the basis of someone telling them to. This experiment speaks to the ’nature of responsibility’ and to see if the subject will stop the experiment due to its dangerous nature. The subject is tricked into thinking they are the teacher‚ and the other person in the room‚ an actor‚ is the learner. The teacher will ask the learner a series
Premium Education Psychology Milgram experiment
the whole‚ they are no longer considered individuals but products of conformity. Stanley Milgram‚ a Yale psychologist‚ engineered an experiment to test the ordinary person’s level of obedience. Many of Milgram’s colleagues admired his intricate experiment‚ and thought that he provided valid information on the complexity of obedience. One of his colleagues‚ Diana Baumrind‚ however‚ strongly disagreed with Milgram and has good reasons to criticize his experiment. She thought his experiment was unethical
Premium Psychology Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment