1. What is the “Lucifer effect” and how was it evident in the Milgram Study? The Lucifer effect refers to a transformation of human character that causes good people to commit evil actions. The effect was seen in the experiment where the prisoners and the guards started to become hostile towards one another even though they weren’t like so before the experiment. 2. What are “shield laws” and what role did they played in the Weinstein Decision? Shield laws are laws that protect researchers from being
Premium Psychology Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment
inflicted upon another person. "The Perils of Obedience" by Stanley Milgram reports on his controversial experiment that test how far individuals would go in obeying orders‚ even if carrying out those orders caused serious harm to others. This experiment caused a lot of controversy and one woman in particular believed that this experiment was immoral. Diana Baumrind’s "Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience" says that Milgram "entrapped" (329) his subjects and potentionally harmed his subjects
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
In a series of experiments regarding obeying authority‚ Stanley Milgram found that “the physical presence of an authority is an important force contributing to the subject’s obedience or defiance”. Milgram concluded from his study that the proximity of an authoritative figure plays a huge role in determining whether or not the subject carried out the experiment. Specifically in the case of the Asian family‚ the daughter followed the directions
Premium Family Family Milgram experiment
Social Experiment Paper The Milgram’s Experiment The Milgram’s Experiment was conducted by Social psychology by the name of Stanley Milgram‚ he created this experiment on how being in the presents of an authority figures would affect the way people behaved. This study was conducted in July 1969‚ just one year after the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram developed this experiment to answer the question "Could it be that Eichmann and his millions
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Social psychology
Argument Synthesis Option #1: Stanley Milgram vs. Diana Baumrind At very young ages‚ most of us are taught the importance of being obedient. Many of us may have even been rewarded for obedience and punished for disobedience. For most of us‚ being obedient creates a sense of accomplishment and pride‚ but what happens when we are put in a position where obeying a certain order results with violating ones own moral beliefs? In 1963‚ Stanley Milgram‚ a professor of psychology at Yale University
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Social psychology
English 1A 20 June 2012 Sphere of Authority Stanley Milgram‚ a Yale psychologist‚ stunned the world when he stated that “perhaps the most fundamental lesson of our study is that ordinary people doing their jobs‚ and without particular hostility on their part‚ can become agents in a terrible destructive process.” Milgram’s stunning conclusions‚ which were derived from his experiments‚ proved that obedience is one of the basic elements in the structure of social life. The proximately of the victim
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Stanley Milgram
Stanford Prison Experiment conducted in 1971 by Dr. Philip Zimbardo would not be able to be conducted these days. When conducting an experiment with humans there are many ethical guidelines that are to be followed. The rights and well being of the participants must be weighed against the study’s value to science. The people always come first‚ and research second. This was not the case in Dr. Philip Zimbardo’s experiment. I found that there were many ethical considerations
Premium Stanford prison experiment Science Milgram experiment
Behavioural Study of Obedience: Milgram’s Experiment M.J George Brown College #1) Obedience I think the three aspects of the situation faced by the subjects in Milgram’s study were the prestige of the university‚ the proximity of the experimenter‚ and the money paid. These aspects were the most influential in causing the subjects to obey. The influence of the prestige of Yale University was a key point to get the obedience of the subjects. People are prone to obey more
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
Baumrind vs. Milgram Milgram conducted an experiment which includes the subject of the experiment is in a laboratory environment and is told to give increasingly severe electric shocks to another person. The subject is getting told to do so by a person in a white lab coat‚ who appears to be a scientist; but is actually an actor. The person in the white lab coat tells the subject to continue to increase the level of shock the other person receives until they reach the level of “Danger Severe Shock
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Stanley Milgram‚ in his article‚ Perils of Obedience‚ writes about his experiment‚ of how people obey an authority‚ neglecting their conscience‚ and how this can be a threat to real life experiences. In contrast‚ another Psychologist‚ Diana Baumrind‚ in her article‚ "Review of Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience‚" states that Milgram’s experiment was unsuccessful for many reasons; and therefore‚ it is not valid. Both Psychologists have different views on the validity of the experiment and on
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment