Describe and discuss two factors that Milgram found effect obedience? Refer to empirical evidence in your answer Milgram’s original study into obedience came under to a lot of scrutiny because of both mythological and ethical problems. This meant that the validity of Milgram’s study was put into question. Following the study were further investigations to see what might change and explain the results that Milgram found‚ both by Milgram himself and other psychologists. Variations to his study throw
Premium Scientific method Research Quantitative research
nine ethical guidelines which aims to prevent unethical behaviour that could cause psychological and physiological harm to the participants. This essay aims to discuss the Stanley Milgram obedience to authority experiment and how it relates to the
Premium
Ethical Quiz Over the years there have been many breakthroughs in medical science. These findings have help use grow through history fighting new diseases to help the people of the world. But some studies were done out of pure hatred and misunderstanding. Some researchers abused power and ruined the lives of their participants. In 1932 the U.S. public Health service launched the the most horrific non-therapeutic experiment in medical history.The physicians of the experiment promised medical treatment
Premium African American Black people Race
on Milgram & Zimbardo and explain which study is the most useful in understanding human behaviour in a social situation (focusing on the methods used and findings obtained) and which study is the most unethical. The study of social psychology‚ particularly conformity‚ is very difficult to conduct both ethically and accurately in order to be able to obtain useful results. In the studies done by Milgram and Zimbardo‚ ethics were definitely breached but to what extent were these experiments useful
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology
had to give an electric shock. The subjects were told that this was part of an experiment‚ by someone in a white coat. In one case‚ the subject was informed that the person they were administering "shocks" to had a heart condition. If at any time the subject indicated his desire to halt the experiment‚ he was given a succession of verbal prods by the experimenter‚ in this order: Please continue. The experiment requires that you continue. It is absolutely essential that you continue.
Premium Person Nazi Germany Nazism
An Ethical Analysis of the Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford Prison Experiment‚ although very fascinating and revealing of human nature‚ raises ethical questions regarding the methods used by Zimbardo and his research team. Although it is important from a research standpoint to be able to conduct experiments that will provide real‚ unmolested data‚ there must be a line that defines when research or an experiment becomes unethical‚ whether wholly or partially – research should not go on simply
Premium
War II‚ the Holocaust was taking place‚ German doctors performed a number of unethical medical experiments in order to advance in medicine‚ these crimes were committed against individuals‚ without consent. Recently‚ I read Auschwitz: A Doctor’s Eyewitness Account‚ a novel written by Dr. Miklos Nyiszli‚ the information documented in the novel was difficult to digest due to the truly horrendous experiments performed in the camps‚ it led me to think about the violation of humankind for the sake of medicine
Premium Nazi Germany Adolf Hitler The Holocaust
Milgram (1963) Behavioural Study of Obedience Thinking like a Psychologist - Evaluating the Core Study What are the strengths and weaknesses of the method used? The method used by Milgram was the laboratory experiment. The main advantage that Milgram had with this method was the amount of control he had over the situation. He controlled what the participants saw‚ heard and experienced and was able to manipulate their behaviour through what they were exposed to. This method also allowed accurate
Free Psychology Ethics
terrible things are showing their true form. These were some of the reasons behind the Milgram and Zimbardo experiments. These experiments were to test people’s obedience to authority - or a man in a lab coat. Milgram’s experiment was the first of its kind‚ seeing as how similar experiments were repeated afterward‚ and he wanted to prove that authority was a major part in why people listened to others. This experiment was started after a german soldier claimed he shouldn’t be prosecuted for torturing
Premium Prison Crime Criminal justice
I think the Milgram and Zimbardo’s results is a good theory for the Holocaust. When the two‚ Instructor and Student‚ were in role play for every wrong answer the instructor would shock the student. At times when the instructor would say‚ “I don’t want to do this” or “I can’t do this” shows he does have a consequence‚ but he continued to still push the trigger. Although it was just an actor playing the role and no one was being shocked it is terrible to see how he continued to go on with the test
Premium Morality Jury Thought