Stanly Milgram’s and Philip Zimbardo’s had similar results‚ both showing how humans obey authority. Milgram studied obedient on authority. Zimbardo studied why guards and prisoner play that role in prison. The Milgram and Zimbardo experiments showed how humans are so obedient that we are capable of hurting innocent people if ordered to do so. The study of obedience‚ conducted by Milgram‚ was to test how the subject would obey when ordered by the experimenter to adminater a shock to another human
Premium Stanford prison experiment
Stanley Milgram: ’electric shock’ experiments (1963) - also showed the power of the situation in influencing behaviour. 65% of people could be easily induced into giving a stranger an electric shock of 450V (enough to kill someone). 100% of people could be influenced into giving a 275V shock. The Milgram Experiment Stanley Milgram (1963) Experiment: Focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Investigate: Whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Stanley Milgram
recent issue of American psychologist‚ Diana Baumrind (1964) raised a number of questions concerning the obedience report. (Milgram). Many would argue that Stanley Milgram’s experiment was unethical‚ because they believe that the research caused the subjects psychological stress that was not resolved after the study‚ however‚ I beg to differ. In his own words Stanley Milgram said‚ “In my judgment‚ at no point were subjects exposed to danger and at no point did they run the risk of injurious effects
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Individual task for CA2. Provide a brief description of the study in your own words (this should be no more than 350 words). Milgram started his obedience study experiments in 1961.He was highly influenced by the defense of criminal Adolph Eichmann used second world war that he was simply following instruction when he ordered death of millions of jews. He carried out his experiment in Yale University to check whether people obey the orders of authority figure to cause pain to a stranger. The
Free Milgram experiment Stanley Milgram Stanford prison experiment
Social influence is defined as individual mental process (conviction‚ perception‚ thought‚ reaction) and behaviour are being changed in a social group interaction Milgram’s experiment is to study the effect of obedience to authority. Study was performed to determine what factors influenced people to submit to authority and to what extent people conform an order against their conscience despite knowing it causes distress and harm to another person. McLeod‚ S. (1970). 40 male participants between
Premium Psychology Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
damage. The Milgram experiment even though it was a hoax had a lasting effects on many of it’s participants in both positive and negative ways and is a example of why humans should not be used as test subjects. The Milgram experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram a assistant professor of psychology at Yale. The experiment wanted to show the obedience in people to the authority in others by creating a fake “shocking machine“. Lauren Slater quotes in the book Opening Skinners Box “In Milgrams view‚ any
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Human
beliefs as long as they were guaranteed that it was justified in some way shape or form‚ or otherwise reassured that the person they would supposedly be harming would make it through with their life intact and only sustain minimal if any damage. The Milgram experiment was a social experiment on the obedience of a normal person to that of the whims of a figure of authority. This was completed through a series of social - psychological experiments that were conducted by an instructor at Yale University
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
given the choice to be done with the experiment whenever they want‚ the experimenter still insisted they should go on with the next question. Dr. Berger found that even though women are seen as more compassionate than men‚ women were more likely to continue up to the 150 volts than men were. This has much to do with the fact that a male was the authority and the women did not want o look weak or did not want to give up because of that. I believe that if the authority was a woman‚ more women would leave
Premium Experiment Psychology Stanford prison experiment
Critical Thinking Stanley Milgram Experiment I feel the reason the Milgram Experiment subjects were lacking the moral and critical thinking of how they reacted to the experiment was a multitude of things such as. The subjects felt they had to because they were being told to by “people of authority” They also felt that since they were participating in the experiment and they were only doing “as told” then they were okay to proceed. Some also stated that do to the trust they had for the school and
Free Psychology Stanford prison experiment Thought
Stanley Milgram‚ a famous social psychologist‚ and student of Solomon Asch‚ conducted a controversial experiment in 1961‚ investigating obedience to authority. The experiment was held to see if a subject would do something an authority figure tells them‚ even if it conflicts with their personal beliefs and morals. This experiment brought uproar amongst the psychological world and caused the code of ethics to be reviewed and ultimately changed. In the experiment subjects were asked to administer
Free Psychology Stanford prison experiment Stanley Milgram