Pharmaceuticals: Merck Sustaining Long-term Advantage Through Information Technology Hiroshi Amari Working Paper No. 161 Working Paper Series Center on Japanese Economy and Business Columbia Business School December 1998 Columbia-Yale Project: Use of Software to Achieve Competitive Advantage PHARMACEUTICALS: MERCK Sustaining Long-term Advantage Through Information Technology Prepared by Hiroshi Amari Research Associate‚ Yale University William V. Rapp and Hugh T. Patrick Co-principal
Premium Clinical trial Pharmaceutical industry Drug development
Merck was at the top of the pharmaceutical market for many years. The company made substantial profits almost every year. Not only were they a company that made money but they also made their financial gains in an ethical manor. Fourton magazine even named them the “most admired” company. But in 2004‚ the company would be faced with major challenges that would threaten to end the company’s existence. Their once best selling painkiller Viol had been recalled by the federal government because the drug
Premium Pharmacology Pharmaceutical industry
Merck and Co. and river blindness MANUEL VELASQUEZ‚ Business Ethics. Concepts and cases 4th edt.‚ Prentice Hall‚ Upper Saddle River‚ New Jersey‚ 1998 River blindness is an agonizing disease that affects some 18 million impoverished people living in remote villages along the banks of rivers in tropical regions of Africa and Latin America. The disease is caused by a tiny parasitic worm that is passed from person to person by the bite of the black fly which breeds in river waters. The tiny worms
Premium Pharmaceutical industry Ethics Drug discovery
Questions for the Merck Case Create a decision tree for Merck. The 2 leftmost branches would identify the alternatives related to licensing Davarink (specifically license versus not to license). Next‚ if Merck decides to pursue license‚ they go into phase I which results in a success‚ or failure. Phase I success is followed by phase II where Merck has the opportunity to develop the drug to treat depression alone‚ weight loss alone‚ or both‚ or contemplate phase II failure. Finally phase
Premium Decision tree Decision theory
GAC 023 Assessment event: Estimation of sizes The male and female hormone’s relation with spatial abilities Student name: Student ID: Teacher: Due date: 10/07/14 Word count: Table of Contents INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………..1 METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………………………………….1 RESULTS……………………………………………………………………………………….2-3 GRAPHICS……………………………………………………………………………………...4 ANALYSIS………………………………………………………………………………………5 DISCUSSION…………………………………………………………………………………… 5-6 CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………………………6
Premium Scientific method UCI race classifications
Executive Summary Merck & Company has been presented with an opportunity to invest $30 million for the purchasing rights of an obesity and high cholesterol lowering drug‚ KL-798 from Kappa Labs. Based on the expected probabilities of success through each product-development phase for this new drug‚ as well as the costs involved‚ the net present value of the project is -$1.16 million and is therefore recommended that Merck passes on the investment. Sensitivity analysis also show that adjusting
Premium Clinical trial Net present value Investment
Merck & Co.‚ Inc (A) (The summary is based on the article in Vol. I and does not include the extra readings given by the professor) This case is a classic example of enterprises trying to balance their business of increasing profits and expected social responsibilities. This dilemma is further accentuated when the company happens to be a pharma company whose decisions directly affect people’s lives. The Dilemma: A possible drug for River Blindness‚ a disease which affects almost 85 million
Premium Pharmacology Medicine Affect
Merck Acquisition of Medco Case Study John X Devry University – Keller Graduate School of Management Finance 561 Professor May 22‚ 2011 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………p.g. 3 Company backgrounds……………………………………………………….………………p.g. 3 Merck & Co.‚ Inc. ………………………………………..…………………….…....p.g. 3 Medco Containment Services Inc. ............................……..…………………………p.g. 4 Reasons for Mergers…………………………………………………………………………p.g. 5 Economies of Scale………………………………………………………………….
Premium Mergers and acquisitions Marketing
Evaluating Merck & Co.‚ Inc vs. Pfizer‚ Inc. Amy Lan Lan Liu Connor Buestad Raghul Subramanian Natalia Cosa ACCT 831 March 16‚ 2011 Table of Contents: Part 1: History‚ Background and Core Business …...................................................................2 a. Merck & Co.‚ Inc. ….............................................................................................................. 2 b. Pfizer
Premium Pharmaceutical industry Pharmacology Generic drug
| Merck & Company Inc. | Case 1 | | | Introduction of the Company Merck was established in 1891 to improve human and animal health through the development of innovative products. Merck currently has two reportable segments‚ the Pharmaceutical Segment and the Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Segment. Merck sells products through several channels including wholesalers‚ retailers‚ hospitals‚ clinics‚ government and managed health services providers. In the 1980’s the Merck was very
Premium Generic drug Pharmaceutical industry Mergers and acquisitions