Environmental Ethics: Singer vs Regan Environmental ethics is defined: as a part of philosophy which considers extending the traditional boundaries of ethics from solely including humans to including the nonhuman world (Wikipedia). For example‚ this includes the preservation of plants and an increase of animal rights. Peter Singer and Tom Regan both argue that animals need a greater voice than their own in the debate of ethical treatment. Despite their very different philosophical views‚ Singer and Regan want
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
Sagarika Reddy Philosophy Honors 03/28/16 Dr. Shorter Speciesism and Moral Status In his work Speciesism and Moral Status‚ Peter Singer compares the behaviors of humans with cognitive disabilities to the behaviors of nonhuman animals. He argues that all human beings do not have cognitive abilities that exceed that of all nonhuman animals. In fact‚ many nonhuman animals have cognitive abilities that surpass the cognitive abilities of human beings with severe mental retardation. Through his argument
Premium Religion God Morality
article “Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality“‚ Peter Singer says that humans have an obligation to the poor and starving; based on the assumption that suffering and starvation is bad. The assumption‚ that there is something morally wrong with having human beings starved to death should make one question whether they have a duty to the poor. Peter examines whether an affluent society like ours has any moral obligation to the poor in this world. In the article Peter said "India needs a minimum of $300‚000
Premium Poverty Ethics Famine
John Muir having a passionate sense of relief with nature. These two authors are both researchers of their philosophies of life. Peter Singers desires his energy towards a sense of relief such as John. These two researchers have made a differences in the world for happiness and peace in a way nature should be treated. Whereas Peter Singers talks about in his essay The Singer Solution to World Poverty convincing the audience with two different situations trying to persuaded the reader to donate their
Premium Transcendentalism Natural environment Environmentalism
animals to fulfill resources needed to sustain the population‚ still is not satisfied with the bounty of products that nature offers‚ but have got more greedy in over consuming every single part of these poor innocent creatures without necessity. Peter Singer in “Animal Liberation” suggests that human should leave animals alone “as much as
Premium Animal rights The Animals Meat
Anacely Gallardo HUM 190 DeCoster 15 December 2014 Peter Singer‚ a well know philosopher‚ notes that “A liberation movement demands an expansion of our moral horizons and an extension or reinterpretation of the basic moral principle of equality.” We‚ humans‚ think that we are superior to others‚ not only to other humans‚ but to other species as well. As the superior race we think we are‚ we tend to use and manipulate animals to our convenience. We play with them and we use them as the subjects in
Premium Human Morality Mammal
Jessica Brown Eng. 96 S. Kim April 21‚ 2014 What is World Poverty? In Peter Singer’s "The Singer Solution to World Poverty" Singer is describing to us in his story that everyone should give up their money to save a child’s life. In that statement‚ its not completely fair that we have to give away our hard earned money to help out kids. Think of it as this‚ lets say he put one in this type of situation‚ what would one think about it? Yes‚ it does make sense that one should help out and
Premium Poverty Africa Sociology
Singer‚ Peter (1946- )‚ Australian philosopher and bioethicist. Born in Melbourne‚ Australia‚ Singer studied at the University of Melbourne and at the University of Oxford‚ in England. He began his career lecturing ethics at Oxford from 1971 to 1973. He subsequently worked at various universities in North America and Australia. In 1977 he became a professor of philosophy at Monash University‚ in Melbourne. Singer also became closely associated with the university’s Centre for Human Bioethics‚ which
Premium Ethics Psychology Pope John Paul II
In "Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality" Peter Singer argues that affluent individuals‚ in fact‚ almost all of us are living deeply immoral lives by not contributing to the relief and prevention of famine. The causes of famine are various and include human wrongdoing‚ but this doesn’t matter‚ according to Singer. What matters is that each of us can minimize the effects of the famines that are now occurring and can take steps to prevent those that might occur. As we go about our daily business‚ living
Premium Famine Ethics Morality
a personal level. Peter Singer‚ most notable for his authorship of “Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality” and the drowning child analogy‚ presents the rather uncommon normative view that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate more resources to humanitarian causes than the present standard. Singer’s perspective on these seemingly radical moral ideals are confronted by many a pragmatic objection‚ ranging from entitlement principles to moral inequalities. Nevertheless‚ Singer builds his argumentative
Premium Poverty Economics Wealth