Kelcey PHIL 1320 Brant September 23‚ 2010 An Argument against Egoism I shall argue that the ideas of both psychological and ethical egoism are fundamentally flawed and should not be practiced. Egoism is flawed because it ignores the fact that people have a predisposition for compassion toward others that cannot be completely expelled from their motives of action. Egoism is also flawed due to the fact that altruism cannot coexist with egoism; therefore‚ because there is altruism in the world
Free Ethical egoism Egoism Individualism
Part 2: Proving God’s existence to an atheist- Teleological Argument First‚ some atheist arguments that may be brought up in the beginning is as follows: God is omnibenevolent and would thus desire to eliminate evil‚ and God is omnipotent and thus could eliminate evil. Evil exists in the world‚ thus God does not exist since evil exists. This is a common argument that may come up about the existence of evil in the world. Most of the evil in the world only occurs because we choose to create it. When
Premium Existence of God Universe Reproduction
Section 1: Socrates’ argument Socrates sits in a prison cell‚ sentenced to death. His wealthy friend Crito has come to speak with him as he waits for a ship from Delos to return and allow executions to begin. Socrates knows that he‚ “must die the day after the ship arrives (Plato‚ 44).” Socrates also knows that he is not guilty of the crimes he was convicted of‚ stating‚ “There have been many who have accused me to you for many years now‚ and none of their accusations are true (Plato 22).” It is
Premium Plato Philosophy Socrates
The classical principles of arguments are described as an argument synthesis which is a claim that reasonable people could disagree with. According to our textbooks synthesis is defined as something that‚ “Brings two or more arguments together‚ allowing for comparison/contrast‚ rebuttal‚ or accumulation of mutually supporting points” (Lamm‚ p. 79).It adheres to an individual’s capability to be able to write syntheses relies on your ability to derive a relationship amid your sources like writing documents
Premium New Orleans Louisiana Hurricane Katrina
Slippery Slope Argument Phil 103 19 April 2006 When one argues against an idea or action‚ one form often used is called the slippery slope argument. In a slippery slope argument‚ one takes a consequentialist view on the action in question‚ then extrapolates the further outcome sometimes based on evidence‚ sometimes not. For example‚ I might argue that my teacher should not eat chocolate ice cream‚ because of two reasons: Eating chocolate ice cream stimulates pleasure centers in the brain
Premium Terri Schiavo case Persistent vegetative state Slippery Slope
paper‚ I will argue Descartes’ argument‚ that it is possible to gain knowledge‚ is flawed and incorrect. First‚ I will set out Descartes’ premise for believing knowledge is possible. Next‚ I will reintroduce his ideas in order to point out flaws and show the weakness of his position. Then‚ I will provide a counter to my assertions. Finally‚ I will give my reasons for supporting the notion that it is not possible to gain knowledge. Descartes’ Argument Descartes’ argument for knowledge is based on skepticism;
Premium Existence Mind Metaphysics
The following argument is flawed for numerous reasons. Primarily‚ the argument is based on some unwarranted assumptions rendering the invalid conclusion that the Mozart school is the first choice for parents. To begin‚ the conclusion is based largely on the perception that issued alternatives certainly lead to the higher efficiency of the school. In doing this‚ the author fails to mention other possible factors that can impress parent decisions. It is likely that the school tuition is very high regarding
Premium Education High school College
Claim Your opinion or position on an issue Must be supported with evidence (Quotes‚ fact‚ data) Evidence must be explained RACE paragraph= Claim Counter Claim Consider the opposite side Argues against your claim Turn against your argument to challenge it The turn back to reaffirm your position Rebuttal
Premium Writing Essay Critical thinking
yesterday‚ July 23‚ 2013—the rubout argument has been proven by the investigative team. For this essay‚ the question will be—“Is it right to kill criminals?” Before we can answer the question‚ there are two things to consider? (1) Was the murdering of the two members of the Ozamiz group rooted on moralistic reasons—like what vigilantes do? Or (2)‚ because the two “implicated” certain police officers [names]? Here‚ we must answer both possibilities with an if-then argument. If (1) was true‚ then constitution-wise
Premium Capital punishment Crime Law
Aquinas’ Five Proofs What real evidence can be supplied for God’s existence? St. Thomas‚ in his Summa Theologica‚ sets forth five separate proofs for the existence of God‚ Unlike St. Anselm’s proof‚ which deals with pure concepts‚ St. Thomas’ proofs rely on the world of our experience-what we can see around us. In these proofs we can easily see the influence of Aristotle and his doctrine of the Four Causes. l) The Proof from Motion. We observe motion all around us. Whatever is in motion now
Premium Ontology Existence of God Existence