Joseph Dye 04/03/2015 CJAD 405 MADDOX V. MONTGOMERY United States Courts of Appeals‚ Eleventh Circuit 718 F.2d 1033 (11th Cir. 1983) Facts: Jimmy Maddox was sentenced to serve a life of imprisonment after he was convicted in a Georgia State court for charges of rape. Maddox filed for a federal Habeas corpus petition after being unsuccessful at a direct appeal for his charges. His reason behind filing the federal habeas corpus was for the court violating the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland for alleging prosecutorial
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus Appeal
and NATIONAL WORKERS BROTHERHOOD‚ petitioners‚ vs. THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS and NATIONAL LABOR UNION‚ INC.‚ respondents. LAUREL‚ J.: The Solicitor-General in behalf of the respondent Court of Industrial Relations in the above-entitled case has filed a motion for reconsideration and moves that‚ for the reasons stated in his motion‚ we reconsider the following legal conclusions of the majority opinion of this Court: 1. Que un contrato de trabajo‚ asi individual como colectivo‚ sin termino
Premium Law Labour relations
Maddox v. Montgomery United States Courts of Appeals‚ Eleventh Circuit 718 F.2d 1033 (11th Cir. 1983) Kenneth Davis CJAD 405‚ Section A Professor Alesio June 08‚ 2011 Facts: Jimmy Maddox was convicted of rape in a Georgia state court and sentenced to life imprisonment. Having unsuccessfully pursued his direct appeal and the state post-conviction remedy‚ Maddox filed a federal habeas corpus petition alleging prosecutorial suppression of exculpatory evidence in violation
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus United States
Running head: Terry v. Ohio‚ 392 U.S. 1 Case Brief of Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 October 4‚ 2014 Facts At approximately 2:30 in the afternoon‚ while patrolling a downtown beat in plain clothes‚ Detective McFadden observed two men (later identified as Terry and Chilton) standing on a street corner. The two men walked back and forth an identical route a total of 24 times‚ pausing to stare inside a store window. After the completion of walking the route‚ the two men would
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Terry v. Ohio
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila FIRST DIVISION G.R. No. L-29485 November 21‚ 1980 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE‚ petitioner‚ vs. AYALA SECURITIES CORPORATION and THE HONORABLE COURT OF TAX APPEALS‚ respondents. TEEHANKEE‚ J.: Before the Court is petitioner Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s decision of April 8‚ 1976 wherein the Court affirmed in toto the appealed decision of respondent Court of Tax Appeals‚ the dispositive portion of
Premium Tax Taxation in the United States Income tax in the United States
CASE BRIEF FOR THE WINDSOR V. STATE OF ALABAMA WINDSOR V. STATE OF ALABAMA 683 So. 2d 1021 (1994) Judicial History: Harvey Lee Windsor was convicted of capital murder under § 13-A-5-40 (a)(2)‚ Code of Alabama 1975. The jury unanimously recommended the death penalty and the trial court accepted the jury’s recommendation and sentenced the appellant to death by electrocution. Windsor then appealed the conviction and sentence to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Facts: Harvey Lee Windsor and Lavon Gunthrie
Premium Court Jury Supreme Court of the United States
Case Study Analysis – Montgomery Ward Year 9 * In the year‚ the company witnessed a significant increase in accounts receivable‚ which could be due to acquisition of Lechmere and its assets may have been added to Montgomery’s revenue * The company also witnessed an increase in its accounts payable—this could also be a transfer from Lechmere * Montgomery’s cash outflow from investing activities increased drastically due to the acquisition. To finance this acquisition‚ the company had
Premium Balance sheet Accounts receivable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
ACW Case study #1 Transamerica Oil Corporation v. Lynes‚ 723 F.2d 758. Procedural History: Transamerica‚ who conducts oil and gas drilling‚ solicited Lynes about their advertisement regarding an injection packer and decided purchased several of them only later to determine that they did not perform properly. Plaintiff decided to file suit‚ under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)‚ the plaintiff claim that there was a breach of an express warranty by the
Premium Law Warranty Appeal
According to Hasker’s Data‚ Maddox exhibits materialism. In his mind‚ Data is only a machine. It has no traits of being in control of a mind‚ no feelings‚ and no understanding of itself. Data is not human. But respecting people‚ Maddox exhibits dualism. Maddox says having a mind that works with the body‚ entitle things such as awareness and feelings is a sound factor of being a human. The dualistic interaction view does not separate the body and the mind‚ so Maddox calls obvious the fact that human
Free Mind Consciousness Thought
1. Citation: United States v. Conti‚ E.D.S.C.‚ Western Division‚ No.5:11-CV-470-F (2012) 2. Facts: In 2011‚ the North Carolina General Assembly passed House Bill 289‚ which approved the DMV to issue speciality license plates. One of these license plates was inscripted with the message “Choose Life.” The Plaintiffs‚ headed by the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina‚ and the Defendants‚ Eugene Conti and Michael Robertson‚ who held State positions directly pertaining to transportation
Premium United States North Carolina South Carolina