Reasoning and Institutions Question 1: “in practice the doctrine of precedent does not constrain judicial decision-making; activist judges can always creatively interpret previous cases to reach the outcome they desire.” Discuss. Answer: In considering whether the doctrine of precedent constrain activist judges like Lord Denning in making their decision‚ we should first examine the English legal system and how judicial precedents operates. The lowest court of law in England and Wales‚ which
Premium Stare decisis Common law Precedent
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT ON JUDICIAL PRECEDENT Although the Human Rights Act 1998 has impacted on the judicial understanding of precedent‚ the underlying features of the doctrine remain unchanged. The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on one of the most fundamental aspects of any legal system and that is‚ all like cases must be treated alike. It involves the application of the principle of stare decisis i.e to stand by the decided. The doctrine of judicial precedent has always played a pre-eminent
Premium Stare decisis Common law Case law
THE DOCTRINE OF BINDING PRECEDENT INTRODUCTION The doctrine of binding precedent means the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. The doctrine of judicial precedent involves an application of the principle of stare decisis i.e.‚ to stand by the decided. In practice‚ this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. This provides consistency and predictability in the
Premium Stare decisis Case law Precedent
of judicial precedent‚ which predominant value is irrefutable. However‚ it is a disputable question‚ whether the bias of the doctrine on the maintenance of the judicial authority is accurate and contemporary. The nature of precedent can be described by putting the words of Lord Denning in London tramways case: Rule of precedent is not a rule of law at all‚ but a practice laid down by the court for its own guidance; and this practice can be amended or altered. Thus‚ the precedent should be deemed
Premium Stare decisis Common law Law
DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT - LAW MAKING POTENTIAL More Judicial Precedent Resources: Judicial Precedent - Lecture Notes #1 THE JUDGES’ ROLE IN PRECEDENT The old view of the judges’ role was that they were merely ’declaring’ the existing law (the ’declaratory theory’). Lord Esher stated in Willis v Baddeley [1892] 2 QB 324: "There is ... no such thing as judge-made law‚ for the judges do not make the law‚ though they frequently have to apply existing law to circumstances as to which it has not
Premium Common law Stare decisis Law
Judicial Precedent Judicial precedent means the decisions of the higher courts automatically binds the lower courts according to the hierarchy of the courts. This refers to the doctrine of stare decisis. For example‚ the Supreme Court decision binds the Court of Appeal‚ Divisional Courts‚ High Court and County Court. Ratio decidendi is the principle of the case or reasons for the decision and it is binding. In London Street Tramways v. London County Council‚ it said that certainty in the
Premium Stare decisis Precedent Supreme Court of the United States
PROJECT: Chicken Point Cabin LOCATON: Chicken Point‚ Idaho‚ U.S.A. OWNER: Unknown ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig Allen Architects CONSULTING ENGINEERS: Monte Clark Engineering CONTRACTOR: Doric Creager‚ MC Company‚ Spokane FUNCION: Residential Architecture PROJECT COMPLETION: 2002 The Chicken Point Cabin is Located in the North Western area of the states‚ Idaho. In Idaho the climates are similar to its neighbor state Washington where it is much cloudy and precipitates almost
Premium Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Frank Lloyd Wright
Introduction: Judicial precedent means the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. The doctrine of judicial precedent involves an application of the principle of stare decisis ie‚ to stand by the decided. In practice‚ this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. This provides consistency and predictability in the law.
Premium Stare decisis Precedent Common law
Judicial Precedent Judicial precedent is the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts or point of law are sufficiently similar. It involves the following principles: First‚ stare decisis‚ which means to stand by the decided‚ whereby lower courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases and appellate courts follow their own previous decisions. For example: The High Court must follow decisions of the Court of Appeal
Premium Stare decisis Case law Precedent
Judicial Precedent means the process whereby judges follow the decisions made by previous judges in similar cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. In deciding a case‚ there will be basic tasks‚ establishing what the facts are‚ meaning what actually happened‚ as well as how the law applies to those facts. The idea of judicial precedent is that once a decision has been made in a set of particular facts‚ similar facts in later cases should be treated in the same way. The rules concerning
Premium Stare decisis Common law Precedent