also strategic decisions that the company must make. Whereas ranking projects based solely on the IRR and NPV sets a short term course‚ a long term strategy must be considered. The company must decide if it wants to claim the strong hold won in the recent price wars through continued low prices and volume or if they would like to diversify further and capture unchartered markets. Rather than launching a group of disparate projects set for pure monetary growth‚ the company should be aware that an overall
Premium Net present value Time value of money
rThe CANADIENNE ’ÉVALUATION DE PROGRAMME LA REVUECanadian Journal ofDProgram Evaluation Vol. 18 No. 2 Pages 1–31 ISSN 0834-1516 Copyright © 2003 Canadian Evaluation Society 1 EVALUATION AND RESEARCH: DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES Miri Levin-Rozalis Department of Education Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva‚ Israel Abstract: This article discusses the similarities and dissimilarities between research and evaluation‚ which are two clearly differentiated disciplines despite their
Premium Scientific method
performance against what was expected. Evaluation is a time-bound and periodic exercise that seeks to provide credible and useful information to answer specific questions to guide decision making by staff‚ managers and policy makers. The aim is to determine the relevance and fulfilment of objectives‚ development efficiency‚ effectiveness‚ impact‚ and sustainability (Policy Framework for the Government-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation framework). An evaluation should provide information that is credible
Premium Government Policy Decision making
ALCAR approach: the Alcar Group Inc. a management education and software company‚ developed an approach to VBM which is based on discounted cash flow analysis Determinants of shareholder value: according to Alfred Rappaport author of creating share holder value; a guide to managers and investors‚ who is regarded as father of share holder value‚ the following seven factors called “value drivers” affect shareholder value 1. Rate of sales growth 2. Operating profit margin 3. Income tax rate 4. Investment
Premium Depreciation Net present value Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Write an essay on monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in which you: describe the difference between monitoring and evaluation distinguish between participatory M&E and conventional M&E describe how participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) is used in practice with specific reference to case studies from China Title: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Introduction 3 2 The difference between monitoring and evaluation 3 3 Distinguishing Participatory
Premium Project management
has motivated me to write this book which is based on my own teaching experiences and the feed back of my students. The book includes the background‚ the core concepts‚ and the models of POM. It is readable‚ comprehensive‚ and contemporary in its approach. The concepts of Operations Management have been delivered to the readers in a simple‚ straightforward manner‚ and without mincing the words to avoid dilution of the materials itself. The layout of the book has been organized to give the readers
Premium Productivity Operations management Management
Asvfdbdfklsdbnvipsdbnipvbnvklsbnaklvnsdklavnklscnvm‚ cxzklv xkclbzviksdbaivbiasdfvbklfbsdklvbkdfvm bxcm‚bvjbsjav mxd vcxmbvbawjbviwoabvm ksdbnvksbdklvbsdabvjxcbmv bcmzx‚cvoweFJWEOVJL;svl:ZXN‚.VN.CXZNBIORAWEN9HSdkVN‚ZXC VM XCVBIWEBAVKB KLDB VOZB KXCNVKX VKXCHNVK IX MXCI NVSDM VISD VSDIVN SKDNVISDNKVN/ASDNV ASDIVNAWEK FVSDNI VSDVKLSDNVKXCZNVNWENVSDA VSDAVSADOVJWEV SD SDV SDVSD VSDV SDVSD The quality of U.S. and Canadian tap water is generally quite good‚ but chlorine is often added as a disinfectant
Premium Hydrogen Water purification Water
ABSTRACT Prospective student teachers were required to choose a curriculum document from either the primary or secondary school sector for evaluation. They were required to conduct such an evaluation using the Daniel Stufflebeam’s CIPP (Context‚ Input‚ Process and Product) Model. The CIPP Model would be used to determine the usefulness of the curriculum in meeting the needs of the Trinidad and Tobago society. Based on possible weaknesses found in the document‚ prospective teachers were to
Premium Education Curriculum
I. Introduction 1. The revised policy of UNDP for evaluation was approved in 2011. The purpose of the policy is to establish a common institutional basis for the UNDP evaluation function. The policy seeks to increase transparency‚ coherence and efficiency in generating and using evaluative knowledge for organizational learning and effective management for results‚ and to support accountability. The policy also applies to UNDP and its associated funds and programmes – the United Nations Capital Development
Premium United Nations Evaluation
The first step in my evaluation process would be to conduct formative research. In a formative evaluation‚ programs or projects are typically assessed during their development or early implementation to provide information about how best to revise and modify for improvement. This type of evaluation often is helpful for pilot projects and new programs‚ but can be used for progress monitoring of ongoing programs. A formative evaluation could be useful in further identifying the scale of foster youth
Premium Developmental psychology Education Management