Name of the Case: Estate of Sinthasomphone v. Milwaukee Citation: 785 F. Supp. 1343 Facts: In May of 1991‚ Konerak Sinthasomphone at 14 years of age‚ was drugged and confined in an apartment by Jeffery Dahmer. Sinthasomphone was held captive in the apartment and both physically and sexually assaulted by Dahmer. At one point‚ Sinthasomphone was able to escape from the apartment. He was subsequently discovered unclothed and injured‚ lying in the street by pedestrians. The pedestrians placed
Premium Race Murder Racism
After a 3 year fight in arbitrary courts‚ the Astro versus Lippo Group reaches it’s final stretch for the finish line. A long running legal battle was sought between Astro‚ a international satellite television network company owned by Malaysia big shot Ananda Krishnan and First Media‚ a brand of multifarious owned Lippo Group led by James Riady when the latter failed to pay the USD$250 million to the Malaysian based Company despite by court order on July 2012‚ by High Court Judge Belinda Ang which
Premium Judge Singapore The Straits Times
Case Study #1 BlackBerry’s Rise in Brand Power The Dueling Marketing Strategies of RIM versus Apple Presented by Team Mpyreon: Natasha Gowda Courtney Szabo Ying Ying Choi Chris Hauk Geoff Salt MKTG 1102 Set 1J ATTN: Professor Anne-Marie Webb Hughes Submission Date: October 19‚ 2009 2 Table of Contents Problem Identification…………….………………………………………………Page 3 Case Findings……………………………………………………………………….3 to 5 a) Facts…………………………………………………………………………...3 b) Research………………………………………………………………………4
Premium Marketing Smartphone
Richardson was required to pay child support accordingly and have visitation rights. The case is good law. It is binding to Arkansas court. Clearly‚ Arkansas court made the final judgment about the custody of the child and visitation by the father. b) Glanding v. Industrial Trust Co.‚ 45 A.2d 553 (1945). The Court of Chancery is not given the jurisdiction to award penalties on government cost recovery cases as it is of limited jurisdiction. Therefore its laws are not mandatory as it can be honored
Premium United States Law Court
The Tinker v. Des Moines case happended during the Vietnam War between 1955 and 1975. Thousans of protests occured againts the Vietnam War in the United States between those 2 dates. In the fall of 1965 in Iowa with a group of 3 minors named Mary Beth Tinker‚ John Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt. They came to School wearing black armband to protest against the Vietnam War. They were asked to take it off or they would be suspended. They disagreed and the school later suspended them because people
Premium High school Education Supreme Court of the United States
I‚ Jessica‚ write this opinion to majority on the case of Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier. The majority opinion claimed that the principal did the right thing in removing the pages before printing. It argued that it did not violate student’s rights‚ but on the other hand it protected the parents in the divorce article and the identities in the pregnancy article. By protecting the rights of others‚ he was also protecting the rights of those individual students mentioned in the articles and the school’s image
Premium Freedom of speech First Amendment to the United States Constitution Human rights
1. The court case that will be written about is Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978. 2. Before this case took place‚ there had recently been many cases and laws that had been implemented regarding racial segregation and discrimination. In 1964‚ The Civil Rights Act passed which forbids racial discrimination in any program or activity receiving federal funding ((2)"Regents of the University of California v. Bakke."). The main law that was put into question and was used in the persecutor’s
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Discrimination Racism
Case: Bell v. Starbucks U.S. Brands Corp.‚ 389 F.Supp.2d 766 (2005)‚ United States District Court Facts: Rex Bell‚ the owner of a small‚ privately owned music venue‚ filed a complaint against Starbuck’s U.S. Brands Corp in response to receiving “cease and desist” letters after he applied for registration‚ with the United States Patent and Trademark Office‚ of the “Starbock Beer” trademark. Bell was seeking a declaratory judgement that the use of the “Star Bock Beer” logo and name‚ in connection with
Premium Law Contract Supreme Court of the United States
Title and Citation: County of Riverside v McGlaughlin‚ 500 U.S. 44 (1991) Type of Action: This Criminal case in which the Maclaughlin claimed that his Fourth Amendment was violated due to the 48 hours arraignment for Probable cause. Facts of Case: Offender MacLaughlin started a legal claim‚ affirming that the County’s routine of consolidating arraignment with a determination of reasonable justification for individuals subject to warrantless arrest was not adequately provoke under the Fourth Amendment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
The second of the Supreme Court Cases to be discussed is Miranda V. Arizona. The importance of this case is that Miranda was interrogated without knowledge of his 5th amendment rights. In this specific case‚ the police arrested Miranda from his home in order to take him into investigation at the Phoenix police station. While Miranda was put on trial‚ he was not informed that he had a right to an attorney. From this the officers were able to retrieve a signed written statement from Miranda. Most importantly
Premium