Case Study: Metallurgy Plus & Custom 500 1. Industrial Relations issues include: - Lack of due diligence by the company for not carrying out proper investigations into a plausible allegation. - Insufficient protection of a worker by the management\supervisor resulting in exposure to mental and emotional harassment and eventual violence. -Inaction by a supervisor following a worker’s complaint of harassment\intimidation. - Measures should have been put in place to stop or address the
Premium Pleading Cause of action Legal terms
FAR 600 TUTORIAL 4 BACC 8G GROUP MEMBERS: NUR AIN BT ABU BAKAR NUR LIYANA BT MOHD ZAINI AKMA NUR AMANINA BT ZAKARIA MADIHAH BT ABU THARIM DATE OF SUBMISSION: 5 APRIL 2013 PREPARED FOR: MADAM AFIDAH BT SAPARI QUESTION 5 How principal in the agency relationship protects again the opportunistic behavior of the agent and the agent’s response to this. There are two costs that will be implemented by the principal towards the opportunistic agent behavior. First is monitoring cost which
Premium Annual report Energy Financial statements
Marcos v Ruiz FACTS: * After conducting a preliminary investigation‚ Asst‚ Fiscal of Tagbilaran City filed to RTC Bohol 2 information against Marcos for violation of BP 22. * Marcos appeared during the scheduled arraignment but asked for resetting because his lawyer has just withdrawn from the case. The court granted his request. * Later‚ Marcos was able to settle his obligation with the complainants and the latter executed an Affidavit of Desistance. Because of that‚ Asst. City Fiscal filed a Motion
Premium Lawyer Civil procedure Jury
390 Ga. 638 SOUTH EASTERN REPORTER‚ 2d SERIES 282 Ga.App. 229 BECKS v. PIERCE. tained in automobile accident with intoxicated bar patron in the absence of evidence that bar owner knew that patron was going to drive home. West’s Ga.Code Ann. § 51–1– 40(b). No. A06A1149. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Nov. 2‚ 2006. Certiorari Denied Feb. 5‚ 2007. Background: Motorist brought action against bar owner under Dram Shop Act for injuries she sustained in automobile accident with
Premium Jury United States Appeal
Axia College Material Appendix B Mens Rea and Defense Directions Read the seven case scenarios in Box 2.3 on p. 31 in The Courts in Our Criminal Justice System. Choose three of the seven case scenarios to answer. Then‚ indicate which bulleted case scenarios you selected (1-7). Determine whether the individuals possess mens rea; if yes‚ then what type (reckless negligence‚ culpable negligence‚ or felony-murder rule). If there is no mens rea‚ write None. Then‚ determine what type
Premium Criminal law Crime Law
Real World Problems 24-3 Triffin would not be able to claim holder in due course status. Jermielem Merriwether never signed his check. Even though the clerk from A-1 printed his name on the check‚ which was not a proper signature. Merriwether was the only one who was authorized to sign the check. Since the check was never properly signed‚ there was no requirement that it had to be paid. 24-4 Yes‚ the rule states that a drawer is not liable on an unauthorized indorsement. The exceptions
Premium Cheque Law English-language films
Chapter 3 3.3 QUIZ In the appeal to force‚ the arguer physically attacks the listener. F In the fallacy of accident‚ a general rule is applied to a specific case where it does not fit. T If an arguer attempts to discredit court room testimony or a promise by pointing out that the witness or the person making the promise is a liar‚ then the arguer commits an argumentum ad hominem (argument against the person) fallacy. T (calling someone a liar without evidence is abusive) In the argumentum ad
Premium Law Jury Evidence law
Rick Richards‚ et ux. v. Commissioner Facts: The petitioners‚ Mr. Richards and Mrs. Richards‚ Issues: 1. Whether petitioner (both Mr. Richards and Mrs. Richards) conducted their writing or acting activities with the objective of making a profit within the meaning of §186? 2. Whether petitioners have substantiated the ordinary and necessary business expense of these activities? 3. Whether petitioners are entitled to carry forward a net operating loss from a prior tax year 4. Whether petitioners
Premium Law Legal terms Civil procedure
Lakeman v Mountstephen (1874) LR 7 HL 17‚ 43 LJQB 188‚ 22 WR 617‚ 30 LT 437‚ [1874-80] All ER Rep Ext 1924 Court: pre-SCJA 1873 Judgment Date: circa 1874 Case History Annotations Case Name Citations Court Date Signal - Lakeman v Mountstephen (1874) LR 7 HL 17‚ 43 LJQB 188‚ 22 WR 617‚ 30 LT 437‚ [1874-80] All ER Rep Ext 1924 pre-SC JA 1873 circa 1874 Affirming Mountstephen v Lakeman (1871) LR 7 QB 196‚ 36 JP 261‚ 41 LJQB 67‚ 20 WR 117‚ 25 LT 755 Ex Ch circa 1871 Cases referring
Premium Contract Legal terms Debt
Lucio Morigo vs People Facts: Lucio Morigo and Lucia Barrete were then boardmates for a lengthy period of time until they part ways and lost contact. After many years‚ Lucio was surprised to receive a card from Lucia‚ all the way from Singapore. They maintained constant communication and became sweethearts. They married each other at Iglesia de Filipina Nacional at Bohol by merely signing a marriage contract by themselves and without solemnization. Thereafter‚ Lucia went back to Canada
Premium Marriage Legal terms Contract