Robbery – Sufficiency of the Evidence The issue before the COA in this case is whether there was sufficient evidence to convict Petitioner of robbery. Petitioner was charged and convicted of robbery‚ theft over $500‚ and second degree assault. Petitioner was sentenced to imprisonment for robbery‚ and‚ for purposes of sentencing the other two convictions merged. Petitioner challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his robbery conviction. The COA addresses the following question: Did the
Premium Evidence State Logic
Although pedophilic allegations are harsh claims that should only be convicted upon if certain‚ is it wrong to suspect pedophilic activity and attempt to uncover truth? John Patrick Shanley prods at this question in Doubt. Dount is a parable focused on a conservative nun who has reason to suspect a priest may have sexual relations with a minor. Even at the end of the story‚ the allegation is never truly proved or debunked. Using all of the information given‚ I have come to the conclusion that Father
Premium Legal burden of proof Logic Skepticism
Chapter: One Introduction 1.1 Background: In very common terms‚ hearsay does mean statements or any gossips that one hears from the other source but is not sure whether it is true. However in legal sense it holds rather broader technical sense.1 Hearsay in legal sense is taken as evidence provided by the third party.2 That is to say‚ hearsay evidence is supplied by a person who has not witnessed the incidence directly with his or her own senses. To cite few examples of hearsay evidence‚ A
Premium Law Evidence law Legal burden of proof
Feedback: ch. 4 Question 4 of 10 10.0/ 10.0 Points Constructive possession requires the defendant to possess the item on his or her person. True False Answer Key: False Feedback: ch. 4 Question 5 of 10 10.0/ 10.0 Points The test for legal causation is “objective foreseeability.” True False Answer Key: True Feedback: ch. 4 Question 6 of 10 10.0/ 10.0 Points To successfully claim self-defense‚ the defendant must prove that he or she reasonably believed that he or she was going
Premium Property law Criminal law Legal burden of proof
In a carefully and a well-researched judgment‚ Justice S. Ravindra Bhat of the Delhi High Court refused to grant an injunction (temporary) on Cipla from selling in India‚ a generic versions (Eroclip) of a patented anti-cancer drug (Erlotinib or Tarceva) belonging to Roche. However‚ Cipla was disallowed to export to other countries (temporarily). Due to the inability of the plaintiff (Roche) to prove its contention‚ the judgement of the case was based on the grounds of “public interest” To force
Premium Prima facie Legal burden of proof Judgment
(1.) The controversial issue is about Pro-Gun lawmakers are open to limits on size of magazines. (2) The issue is that some of the influential lawmakers in Republicans and Democrats parties believe that the proposed ban on assault weapons as politically poisonous. That there is difference between the size of magazine and assault weapons. (2b)Some lawmakers agreed that if the ban on the size of 15-30 rounds devices that have been used in shootings rampages from Aurora‚ Tucson‚ Colorado‚ and Newtown
Premium Legal burden of proof Arizona Support
Wills Section 77-Capacity * 18 or have been married * of sound disposing mind (Banks v Goodfellow) * Courts have established principles to determine sound disposing mind. * must prove testator had animus testandi i.e intention to make disposition of property to be effective upon death. * Matter for court to decide whether will of free and capable testator * English position gave significant leeway to testator: Bird v Luckie: Wigram VC‚ testator is not bound to make will
Premium Capital punishment Legal burden of proof Witness
Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting play about an unfortunate young man‚ who was convicted of killing his dad. The worst part was‚ the young man was only nineteen‚ and his life was just starting. The jurors listened to all the evidence‚ then came the hard part‚ making the decision: guilty‚ or innocent. Eleven jurors said guilty and only one said innocent. There was a lot of peer pressure involved. I decided to write about different peer pressures three of the jurors used. The three jurors I picked
Free Jury Trial Legal burden of proof
Trace evidence is based on Locard’s exchange principle which contends that every contact no matter how slight will leave a trace . The trace is normally caused by objects or substances contacting one another‚ and leaving a small sample on the contact surfaces. Foreign objects or pieces of material present at a crime scene and tracing its origin can assist in an arrest and conviction the same way finding some trace from the victim or crime scene on a suspect can have a strong impact on a case. Trace
Premium Forensic evidence Evidence law Evidence
Amanda Prieto Bus 233-004LY Criminal Law Essay 10/14/11 Obligations and Rights As what I have read‚ the obligations and rights in reference to criminal law‚ every case is different. The most common cases when defending oneself against a criminal charge are “I didn’t do it” and “I did it but I shouldn’t be held responsible.” In one of the defenses of a criminal charge‚ there is one topic where people are innocent until proven guilty. It is an actual presumption where the judge and jury assume
Premium Law Jury Criminal law