United States V McClatchey 217 F3d 823 Cir.‚ (10th ‚ 2000) I. Background This case of U.S government versus defendant McClatchey involves hospital CEO‚ two physicians‚ and Mr. McClatchy who is a part of the administrative staff at Baptist Medical center. Two physicians involved in the case worked together in a group practice called BVMG that provided care to the nursing homes. In 1984‚ they brought a proposal to the Baptist Medical Center to have them buy the practice and in return physicians
Premium Jury Physician
If the player was to sue for the actions that coach Bill Beam did resulting in a severe neck injury and concussion there will be serious consequences for all parties involved with the school organization. First and foremost is without a doubt coach Beam will be fired immediately for physically harming a student athlete by which in any school in the country is not right. The Athletic Director and School will be held liable by the doctrine of Vicarious Liability or Respondent Superior which holds
Premium Employment Tort law Vicarious liability
MEMORANDUM TO: Senior Partner FROM: Paralegal RE: Natalie Attire DATE: July 3‚ 2013 QUESTION PRESENTED Did Natalie Attire act in a professional manner when she got the full length tattoo on her arm‚ and was she rightfully terminated from her job because of the incident? BRIEF ANSWER Ms. Attire had asked another waitress at the establishment‚ when she should have went straight to her supervisor (Ms. Biddy Baker) and asked about getting a tattoo that would take up the
Premium Termination of employment Early childhood education New Mexico
branch. 3. The passage above also discusses one court case. Who were the parties involved in the case? State v Johnson 4. The case was heard by three lower courts before it reached the United States Supreme Court. List those three courts in order‚ beginning with the court that has the most authority and ending with the court that has the least amount of authority. a. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals b. Texas Court of Appeals Fifth District c. Dallas County Criminal Court 5. Provide the
Premium United States Law Supreme Court of the United States
Issues 1.Does a partnership exist between Ed‚ Jake‚ Charlie and Bella? 2. Are Ed‚ Charlie and Bella also liable for the lawsuit against the firm by their client Mr Laurent.? 2. If so how far responsible are the other partners for Jakes mistake? 3.If no other partner liable‚ what excludes them? 4.Are there any defences to any of the members of the firm from being liable to the lawsuit? Law: Partnerships Partnership Act 1891 (QLD) Nature of Partnership Determination of existence of partnership
Premium Corporation Partnership Business
law is case law (often called common law). Around 1250‚ a common law was produced to be applied consistently and could be used to predict particular decisions. Actually‚ there are three different cases for the common law to be used in. Firstly‚ in order to describe the law which is common to whole country‚ it might be applied in contrast to the term ‘local law’. Secondly‚ the term was created in the common law courts from the one made in the equity courts (the Courts of Chancery). The rules which
Premium Common law United Kingdom Law
Title Page Abstract The rationale of this research paper is to help the final consumers be more aware of the impact of their purchasing power in uplifting the economic status of the Philippine market. This has something to do with the comparison involving the sales income of the micro-businesses in the state and those of the marketing strategy of SM Supermalls which merely focuses on retail. One of the factors in coming up with this idea is the fact that shopping
Premium Retailing Philippines Shopping mall
“The legislature cannot‚ according to our constitution‚ bind itself as to the form of subsequent legislation‚ and it is impossible for Parliament to enact that in a subsequent statute dealing with the same subject-matter there can be no implied repeal. If‚ in a subsequent Act‚ Parliament chooses to make it plain that the earlier statute is being to some extent repealed‚ effect must be given to that intention just because it is the will of the legislature.” (per Maugham LJ in Ellen Street Estates
Premium Statutory law Law Constitution
xxCorporate Governance and Ethical Responsibility Research Paper Samuel Ensah Prof; Dorothy Silben Strayer University Springfield‚ Deleware Campus Law‚ Ethics‚ & Corporate Governance (LEG‚ 500) June; 8th 2012 Introduction In this research paper I will discuss what Dr. DoRight‚ of Universal Human Care Hospital will do when he discovers that patients within the hospital have been dying as a result of a variety
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Negligence in the Gym This suit would be covered under the tort of negligence. The first thing to consider if there was a duty of care owed to Steve by either the manufacturer or the Health Club because he could potentially be able to sue both of them. In both cases yes‚ a duty of care is owed to him‚ because the manufacture has a responsibility to ensure that safety of the equipment that they produce. Even though the manufacturer did not have any direct contact with the final consumer
Premium Tort Tort law Duty of care