• CASE #1: SECOND DIVISION G.R. No. 175366 : August 11‚ 2008 J-PHIL MARINE‚ INC. and/or JESUS CANDAVA and NORMAN SHIPPING SERVICES‚ petitioners‚ v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and WARLITO E. DUMALAOG‚ Respondents. D E C I S I O N CARPIO MORALES‚ J.: Warlito E. Dumalaog (respondent)‚ who served as cook aboard vessels plying overseas‚ filed on March 4‚ 2002 before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) a pro-forma complaint1 against petitioners
Premium Appeal Appellate court Supreme court
Case management services were provided through a face to face meeting in Fullerton. Present at the meeting were WYP (Wraparound Youth Partner) Andy Ngo and the youth. WYP checked in with the youth. The youth came back from school and ate lunch. The youth is excited about boxing‚ but would like to reschedule going to boxing for another day. The youth does not have boxing shorts and gloves. WYP Ngo encouraged the youth to just try it out. WYP Ngo encouraged the youth to visit the site. WYP Ngo explained
Premium High school School English-language films
Technology & Production Year 3 K00121700 Case Study Ronan Mitchell Abstract Copyright Law is an important entity within the music industry. It protects the owner of authorship from infringement. Infringement arises when the copyright owner’s work is used without their consent. Although sounds cannot be copyrighted‚ some cases have shown that the argument of copyrighting one’s voice can sometimes hold weight in a court of law. Singer Tom Waits sued snack manufacturer Frito Lay for
Premium Copyright Property Advertising
A Case Study of Criminal Law Student’s Name College A Case Study of Criminal Law Criminal laws relate to the rules and regulations for handling criminal acts like social conducts‚ harming‚ threatening‚ or endangering one’s health‚ safety‚ moral and/or people’s welfare. Unlike civil laws which emphasize the dispute resolution and compensation of the victim‚ criminal laws punish the law breakers (Duff‚ 2010). Criminal law is unique and distinctive for handling crimes with potentially grave penalties
Premium Criminal law Crime
Case Study‚ Susan v The House of Lewis Outlined below is a neutral perspective on a civil law scenario. The text will include an unbiased opinion on whether Susan had any form of contract with House of Lewis Stores LTD and a personal opinion in relation to a compensation claim. Contract law and a personal interpretation will also be discussed. The presence of a contract is only determined when a certain criteria is met‚ this is what known as the elements of a contract‚ these are as follows;
Premium Contract Tort
This essay will discuss the Case study by firstly identifying four elements of contract‚ then justifying duties of Mr. Martin with applying the principles of pre-existing contractual duties. Finally a discussion about part payment of debt and promissory estoppel will be explained. Likewise‚ this essay will evaluate the knowledge of common law and agency relationship. QUESTION 1 a) Four essential elements of a contract should be Offer‚ Acceptance‚ Intention to create legal relations and Consideration
Premium Common law Contract Law
situation that violated the MIA By Law and explain why. (8 marks) The first situation that violated the MIA By Law is this case is when Ariff Al-Hakim & Associates‚ a Chartered Accountant (CA) firm has been approached by Aminurrashid & Co‚ also a Chartered Accountant (CA) firm to undertake a financial statement audit of VCE Construdtion Work Sdn Bhd for the year ended 30th September 2011. However‚ this situation shows indirectly violation of the MIA By Law as the audit firm can ask the other
Free Auditor's report Audit Auditing
Case Jonathan‚ a moneylender makes a loan of $1‚000 to Sheba on Sheba’s representation that she is 19 years old. Sheba is in fact 17 years old. She enrolled for diploma course with a private college for $500‚ spent $200 on a holiday‚ and the balance of $300 on a mini hi-fi set. She now refuses to pay Jonathan. In this case‚ we are acting for Jonathan (plaintiff). Jonathan sues Sheba (defendant) because of free consent and capacity. Free consent that we talk is about misrepresentation whereas capacity
Premium Contract Contract law
Tort of Negligence case study The law of contract: a contract is a legally binding agreement‚ its a promise between two or more to parties with certain things‚each party must fulfill there promises if one of them don’t fulfill there promise then the contract is breached (VOID). The law of tort: A tort is a civil wrong in the sens that is committed against an individual‚ tort is compensated by a sum of money called “DAMAGES”. Contract laws and tort laws share many similarities. At
Premium Tort Contract Common law
School of Management Employment Law The ADA was put in place to protect the rights and employment of individuals with a qualified diagnosed disability.In the ADA tutorial‚ Karina may be eligible for accommodations and to be protected under the ADA because she has met the two required conditions; she has met the qualifications to perform her job and she can perform her job duties with or without accommodations (EEOC‚ ADA‚ 2005). Once Karina provides the proper documentation‚ her case would need
Premium Disability Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Employment