EMTALA The article I chose to discuss was a court case involving the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). A Dickinson County hospital violated EMTALA for failing to provide emergency care for a patient who was transferred to a different hospital without being completely stable enough for transfer. In 1985‚ Congress passed the law of “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act” also known as (EMTALA) to ensure public access and treatment to emergency services regardless of race
Premium Emergency medical services Medicine Hospital
Canny Gabrial Castle v Volume Sales(p200): Canny Gabrial argued that the 2 companies were joint ventures Decision: Agreement was partnership Polkinghorne v Holland(p205): Was the giving of financial advice outside the ordinary business of the law firm‚ such that the partners would be jointly liable Decision: Held that the firm was liable for the actions of hollan’s son Lec 5 Chap 13 Balfour v Balfour(256): At the time of the agreement‚ did the parties intend the arrangement to be anything
Premium Contract
Case- Law & ethics 1 of 2 DOCUMENTS CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN S.A.‚ CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN‚ L.L.C.‚ CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN‚ Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants‚ v. YVES SAINT LAURENT AMERICA HOLDING‚ INC.‚ YVES SAINT LAURENT S.A.S.‚ YVES SAINT LAURENT AMERICA‚ INC.‚ Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees‚ YVES SAINT LAURENT‚ (an unincorporated association)‚ JOHN DOES‚ A TO Z‚ (Unidentified)‚ JANE DOES‚ A TO Z‚ (Unidentified)‚ XYZ COMPANIES‚ 1 TO 10‚ (Unidentified)‚ Defendants-Appellees. Docket
Premium Trademark
Facts of Solomon v Solomon Solomon was a leather merchant who converted his business into a Limited Company as Solomon & Co. limited (the ‘company’). The company so formed consisted on Solomon‚ his wife and five of his children as members. The company purchased the business of Solomon for £39‚000; the purchase consideration was paid in terms of £10‚000 debentures conferring a charge over the company’s assets‚ £20‚000 in fully paid‚ £1 share each and the balance in cash. The company in less than
Premium Corporation Limited liability
Mr Shafron was not a member. Finally‚ Mr Shafron argued that if he was an officer (on either basis)‚ he had‚ in any event‚ not breached his duties in relation to either the ASX issue or the actuarial issue. 2. RELEVANT LAW FOR DECISION MAKING The relevant law relied on by the judge in making the decision was under section 180(1) of the Corporations Act which provides that directors and other officers of a corporation must exercise the powers and duties provided to them with the degree
Premium Corporation Appeal Decision making
Through the essay The two faces of tourism’‚ author Jonathan Tourtellot has expressed his deepest concerns about the rapid growth of tourism and the kind of effect this will have upon maintaining the integrity of the tourist spots as unique places in the world. Through out the essay the continuous friction between the modernization of the tourist spot against keeping them "as it is" is very much evident. In this essay‚ the author has talked about Copper Canyon Country in Mexico and the Tarahumara
Premium Tourism Culture Recreation
CASES ON BANKING LAW Westminster Bank Ltd v. Hilton (1926) 43 TLR 124 As against the money of the customer’s in the banker’s hands the relationship between banker and customer is that of principal and agent: "It is well established that the normal relation between a banker and his customer is that of debtor and creditor‚ but it is equally well established that quoad the drawing and payment of the customer’s cheques as against money of the customer’s in the banker’s hands the relation is that
Premium Bank Contract Money
Case – British Railways board Vs Herrington Relevance - Trespasser duty of care - Common humanity - Occupiers liability act 1984 Facts - Railway line operated by BRB ran through property open to public - Fences were in poor repair - 1965 children seen on line - Child severely injured when he stepped on line after passing through broken fence - Plaintiff claimed damages for negligence Ruling - House of lords held over trespassers‚ a duty to take steps as common humanity to avert
Premium Tort law Tort Law
Jonathan Edwards incorporates simile‚ personification‚ and metaphor as his rhetorical techniques within his sermon Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God. Edwards incorporates rhetorical devices as a means to terrorize and persuade Puritans and to repent their sins. Throughout his sermon‚ Edward utilizes details and God himself to construct a frightening corollary for sinners in the after life. Edward emphasizes how dreadful and cruel the wrath of God truly is. For instance‚ Edward compares the "destruction"
Premium Christianity Sin God
sought to be resolved in the present case involving the application for admission to the Philippine Bar of Vicente D. Ching. The facts of this case are as follows: Vicente D. Ching‚ the legitimate son of the spouses Tat Ching‚ a Chinese citizen‚ and Prescila A. Dulay‚ a Filipino‚ was born in Francia West‚ Tubao‚ La Union on 11 April 1964. Since his birth‚ Ching has resided in the Philippines. On 17 July 1998‚ Ching‚ after having completed a Bachelor of Laws course at the St. Louis University in
Premium Philippines Election Filipino language