Misunderstandings happen often in both personal lives as well as in the workplace. It can be difficult to communicate and get through the misunderstandings but it can be done with patience and a calm approach. The first misunderstanding I experienced was when I work for an aircraft repair station. There were two employees that were working together. Employee “A” was a fifty year old Korean man with a thick accent and a pushy personality who happened to be our Master Mechanic. Employee “B” was a
Premium Nut American films Writing
Introduction In the following report‚ myself and group members have been instructed to act as consultants analysing the service encounter in video 2‚ making use of one or more of the blueprinting modelling techniques. The models used in this report are servquals and service blueprinting. In a challenging and highly competitive market in which service industries proliferate‚ service quality is of paramount importance and essentially encompasses the differences between service expectations and
Premium Customer Customer service Service
brings an action against Dan‚ what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss. Issue: Is Dan liable to Pat for breach of contract. Rule: Here the agreement between Pat and Dan falls outside of Common Law and within the boundaries of the Statue of Frauds. The most relevant of the types of contracts which fall within the Statue of Frauds‚ is an agreement for the sale of land and for an interest in land‚ or an agreement by a purchaser of real property to
Premium Contract
Contents Executive summery 3 Introduction 3 LO 1 A valid contract in a Business Context 3 1.1 The importance of the essential elements required for the formation of a valid contract 3 1.2 Impact of different types of contract 4 1.3 Analyze terms in contracts 5 LO 2 Elements of a contract in Business situations 6 2.1 Elements of contract in given business scenarios 6 2.2 Law on terms in different contracts 6 2.3 Effect of different terms in given contracts 7 LO 3 Negligence in Business Activities 7 3.1 Contrast
Premium Contract Tort Common law
Case Study: The Home Depot Data Breach 1. Security Problem/Incident The theft of payment card information has become a common issue in today’s society. Even after the lessons learned from the Target data breach‚ Home Depot’s Point of Sale systems were compromised by similar exploitation methods. The use of stolen third-party vendor credentials and RAM scraping malware were instrumental in the success of both data breaches. Home Depot has taken multiple steps to recover from its data breach‚ one of
Premium
contract law agreement: objective test of intention to agree offer must be matched by other’s acceptance requirement of certainty of agreement parties have intention to create legal relations enforce promise: consideration promise is contained in a deed promissory estoppel (claimant has relied on defendant’s promise) reliance theory: consistent with the harm principle (prevent harm on others) restitution interest
Premium Contract
CONTRACTS IN BUSINESS On the 10th of September an offer was distinguished between Huddersford Electronics Ltd (HE ltd) and Gem Computer Stores (GCS). The offer was an invitation to treat as there is an entitlement that an offer could accepted and therefore‚ a contract could be formed. An offer is formed as HE ltd posted an offer to sell 10 laptops to GCS‚ keeping the offer open until the 24th September. A statement is made by HE ltd who is giving information to GCS expressing an intention to sell
Premium Contract
valid contract The contract law is a situation where law is related to business transactions. In the situations good are purchased‚ sold‚ as well as moved through the contract. The employees are hired‚ land are developed‚ sold‚ bought leased or financed under the contract. Most of the businesses are based under contracts. Generally‚ the contracts represent foundation of the most of the commercial activities and therefore contract law stands for one of the crucial areas of the business law (Egenhofer
Premium Contract
Case – British Railways board Vs Herrington Relevance - Trespasser duty of care - Common humanity - Occupiers liability act 1984 Facts - Railway line operated by BRB ran through property open to public - Fences were in poor repair - 1965 children seen on line - Child severely injured when he stepped on line after passing through broken fence - Plaintiff claimed damages for negligence Ruling - House of lords held over trespassers‚ a duty to take steps as common humanity to avert
Premium Tort law Tort Law
ETHICS IN CONTRACTS Abstract: When creating a contract‚ a negotiator is not only doing so to reach an agreement between two or more parties‚ but to create an agreement that is durable; whereby parties of the contract are legally bound and committed to its promises . “A legally binding contract is defined as an exchange of promises or an agreement between parties that the law will enforce‚ and there is an underlying presumption for commercial agreements that parties intend to be legally
Premium Contract Ethics Morality