The wild and unexpected technological breakthrough of digital imaging in 1980’s that required Kodak and Fujifilm to radically rethink their very existence. Both the companies saw the disruptive technology coming ahead. Fujifilm cannibalized the film business and Kodak wasn’t able to do it as the reengineering process had to be done. According to Hammer in the book ‘Reengineering the corporations’ reengineering entails the radical redesign of a company’s business process. But while reengineering
Premium Business process reengineering Management Term
2.0 Innovation and Technology Strategy 2.1 The Attacker’s Advantage Most studies have two factors on which explain the attacker’s advantage. 1. The Characteristics of the technological change that link to the capabilities of an organisation. Implication of emerging of new technologies in the industry can cause incumbent not prepare and do not have the capabilities of the technology to compete with. The core technologies upon are generally built in the components used in a product. Henderson
Premium Strategic management Innovation Technology
company. The company Kodak received its name from Eastman and his mother‚ Eastman’s favorite letter was K he stated that it seemed strong to him. Eastman wanted his company name to be short‚ easy to remember‚ easy to say‚ and he wanted to make sure it wasn’t associated with any other business out there. There have also been suggestions that Kodak was originated by David Houston a photographic inventor‚ who had already begun patenting his inventions in the early 1880s. Kodak was founded in 1888 by
Premium Photographic film Camera Fujifilm
Kodak Case Study Company Argument MBA-565 Summary In a 1921 consent decree‚ the government concluded that Eastman Kodak‚ the pioneer firm of amateur photography‚ had violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act. By buying competitors and establishing exclusive dealing contracts with retailers‚ the government claimed that Kodak was acting as a monopoly. The 1921 decree barred Kodak from continuing with these practices. By 1954‚ Kodak enjoyed a 90% share of the color film market and a 90%
Premium Marketing Competition Perfect competition
Eastman Kodak – Case Analysis Problem The problem in this case is concerned with Eastman Kodak losing its market share in film products to lower-priced economy brands. Over the last five years‚ in addition to being brand-aware‚ customers have also become price-conscious. This has resulted in the fast paced growth of lower priced segments in which Kodak has no presence. Kodak plans to address this issue by introducing a new brand‚ “Funtime” in the economy brand segment. Kodak also proposes to replace
Premium Brand Marketing Revenue
Jiaxin Wang Branding Strategy Professor: Grace Zimmerman Case: Eastman Kodak Kodak as a brand had a Unit market share of 70% in a market of 670 million film rolls produced annually. I assume that Kodak Ektar accounted for 30% of the 70%‚ which equals to 21% of the whole market share‚ also equals to 140.7 million sales. The revenue can be calculated by multiplying this sales number by retail price‚ which is $600.79 million. Given the gross margin of 70%‚ the cost of each roll‚ $1.28‚ can be
Premium Price Brand management Brand
PROBLEM STATEMENT Kodak is the photo film market leader since 1994 but the company is loosing share‚ in the past five years in United States has decrease from 76% to 70%‚ the main reason is the growing share of brands with lower prices. In January of 1994 Kodak is analyzing if launching a lower price product is the best alternative to stop loosing share. DIAGNOSIS As said before Kodak is loosing market share and looks like if the company doesn’t do something the tendency is going to be the same
Premium Marketing Brand Price
__Kodak_________________ 1. What is/are the problem(s) in this case? Keep it to a single statement. At most‚ you may point out a couple of the key questions. The problem in the Kodak case is that Kodak is losing market value because they are reworking their product line‚ causing doubt in customer mindset. They have created the Funtime film to attempt to regain market value. 2. What are the key issues? This is just a simple list (condensed SWOT). You do not need to analyze in great detail. The key issues
Premium Marketing Pricing
In year 1994‚ KODAK had important strategic decisions to make in order to ensure that a bright future is waiting for KODAK. At that time‚ although Kodak was dominating the consumer photographic film market‚ it had been facing a 6% decline in market share over a five year period. The reasons for KODAK’s market share loss could be examined in two major parts; supply effect and demand effect. SUPPLY EFFECT DEMAND EFFECT -Attractive
Premium Brand Strategic management Marketing
Análisis de caso Kodak Kodak en la encrucijada: la transición de fotografía en película a fotografía digital Índice 1. Hechos Relevantes * Análisis comercial * Análisis financiero * Modelo de competencia de 5 fuerzas * Análisis FODA * Análisis de cadena de valor 2. Problemas apremiantes 3. Problema principal 4. Posibles soluciones 5. Recomendación 6. Actualización de caso Análisis comercial: * Para el año 2000 los ingresos y las ganancias netas
Premium Empresa Estados Unidos Sociedad