In year 1994‚ KODAK had important strategic decisions to make in order to ensure that a bright future is waiting for KODAK. At that time‚ although Kodak was dominating the consumer photographic film market‚ it had been facing a 6% decline in market share over a five year period. The reasons for KODAK’s market share loss could be examined in two major parts; supply effect and demand effect. SUPPLY EFFECT DEMAND EFFECT -Attractive
Premium Brand Strategic management Marketing
Kodak "Will Kodak’s ’razor and blade’ pricing strategy succeeds?" "Will Kodak’s ’razor and blade’ pricing strategy succeeds?" I believe Kodak’s razor and blade pricing strategy will succeed. Kodak started the photo business a century ago so it is conceivable that they will enter the printer business‚ particularly with an eye on getting more of us to print our digital photos. The Kodak brand has always ranked among the top in the world by name recognition and quality which is a
Premium Inkjet printer
Global Sustainability Eastman Kodak Company 2010 Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Report Scope 3 Leadership Message 6 Company Profile 10 Goals 12 Performance Data 14 Compliance 15 Sustainability Framework 21 Governance 26 Innovation 31 Stewardship 41 Engagement 50 External Recognition 51 About the Photographs SCOPE OF REPORT SCOPE OF REPORT Kodak is pleased to present our fifth annual Global Sustainability Report‚ as well as our 21st public report to include health‚ safety and environmental
Premium Sustainability
Q2: How would you evaluate Kodak’s attempts to enter the digital business to date? Kodak was aware of the opportunities in the digital market as early as 1980s and allocated resources into the digital business‚ but the inconsistency of leadership strategies and resistance at the management level made it difficult to embrace opportunities in the digital market and stood out amid rigorous competitions. Kodak spent massive amount of research into exploring digital technologies since 1983‚ after Sony
Premium Management Marketing
9/3/13 How Fujifilm survived: Sharper focus | The Economist Schumpeter Business and management How Fujifilm survived Sharper focus Jan 18th 2012‚ 13:00 by K.N.C. | TOKYO THE biggest oddity of Kodak’s woes and Fujifilm’s revitalisation is that‚ as we put it in a story this week (http://www.economist.com/node/21542796) ‚ "Kodak acted like a stereotypical change-resistant Japanese firm‚ while Fujifilm acted like a flexible American one." The article looked mostly at Kodak‚ since it is
Premium Photographic film
GEORGE EASTMAN This paper is on a man who had very humble beginnings and through his ingenuity and curiosity was able to enhance the culture we live in‚ even today through his inventions in photography. For without his invention of the roll film‚ photography might be a much more difficult process than we are used to in this day and age. Mr. George Eastman was born on July 12‚ 1854‚ in Waterville‚ NY. His father‚ George Washington Eastman‚ ran a business school where he taught bookkeeping
Premium Photographic film Photography
Kodak: The reason for bankruptcy Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Kodak Company Overview 2.1 Descriptive 2.2 An Analysis of Kodak’s Strategic Strengths 3. Photographic Industry 3.1 Description of the photographic industry 3.2 Analysis Using Porter’s Five Competitive Forces Model Rivalry: high pressure Bargaining power of buyers: median to high pressure Bargaining power of suppliers: low pressure Threats of substitutes: high pressure Threats of new entrants: low pressure 4. Kodak’s
Premium Management Enron Corporation
Company Kodak and Polaroid are both extremely different firms. Polaroid has only one specialization and that is the instant photo market. Kodak on the other hand has reaches in all photo related industries. Kodak had high fixed costs due to their in-house production while Polaroid opted to be flexible and loose by subcontracting most of its production facilities. Therefore‚ Kodak had to reach a certain level of market volume in order to break even and become profitable. Polaroid‚ on the other
Premium Marketing Oligopoly
KODAK CASE STUDY SRN 162658 1. Summary 2. Brief Introduction a. Introduction of a Strategic Position b. Introduction of Eastman Kodak Company 3. Analysis of Strategic Position of Kodak a. Analysis of External Environment i. General Environment ii. Industry Environment iii. Competitive Environment of Kodak iv. Introduction of Directional Policy Matrix v. Apply Directional Policy Matrix to Kodak vi. Conclusion b. Internal Resource Audit i. Physical
Premium Strategic management
Eastman Kodak – Case Analysis Problem The problem in this case is concerned with Eastman Kodak losing its market share in film products to lower-priced economy brands. Over the last five years‚ in addition to being brand-aware‚ customers have also become price-conscious. This has resulted in the fast paced growth of lower priced segments in which Kodak has no presence. Kodak plans to address this issue by introducing a new brand‚ “Funtime” in the economy brand segment. Kodak also proposes to replace
Premium Brand Marketing Revenue