Kantianism : Categorical imperative I : Scenario 1 Proposed rule: (I may lie to use the private library’s PCs with the intention of getting a full scholarship to attend a prestigious university.) In this case. “I can lie with the intention of getting good grades and a scholarship.” • The person in trouble wants his lie to be believed so she gets what she needs – in this case to use the unused private library’s PC’s connected with the net to research and get good grades and later a scholarship
Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Philosophy
sometimes seems useless. However; if this were to be applied as a general rule then no one would ever get help unless the Samaritan deemed it profitable to them. Both of these show how decision making in Kantianism is the key factor in deciding what to do. There are both good and bad sides to Kantianism. First‚ as stated previously‚ we need to do things based on moral reasoning and not just end results. We can’t be officers who can go to the limit of Utilitarianism and allow for things such as an Omelas
Premium Critical thinking Morality Value theory
Moral Reasoning - Aim: Equip students to become critically minded citizens who have the ability to think through the big moral and political questions we all confront as citizens Kant (Deontology) - Rejects utilitarianism: They were half right- of course we seek to avoid pain‚ and seek pleasure. But to think that pain and pleasure drives our behavior. - Thinks that the individual person has a dignity that commands our respect- because we are rational beings‚ capable of reason.; and autonomous
Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative
This essay certainly made your stance on the questions asked known. I appreciated the quick reference to utilitarianism and Kantianism when tackling the first question‚ however‚ some further expansion was definitely needed. In the laborer’s example‚ it is important to know that such strict personal accountability would not work in White-Collar jobs. It is standard for White-Collar workers to be indemnified by their company for any problems that may arise while performing within the capacity of their
Premium Management Employment Ethics
decision-making process‚ Al utilizes moral standards‚ which takes priority over both the self interest of Al or Craig. With that in mind‚ let’s analyze the decision “What should Al do with Craig” using two popular normative theories‚ Utilitarianism and Kantianism. Using the theory of Utilitarianism‚ Al should determine all possible alternatives‚ and then implement the alternative that creates the most happiness (or the least unhappiness) for all parties involved. In this analysis‚ we will consider 3 different
Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Decision theory
Assignment #2 In this assignment you are going to present Kantian arguments against the taking of recreational drugs that are currently illegal in the U.S.‚ such as heroin‚ cocaine‚ and ecstasy. Do not discuss laws or illegality; just stick to the questions as they are written and number your answers. Use the following maxim: In order to maximize my pleasure‚ I will take recreational drugs whenever I feel like it. 1.Explain why this maxim is self-defeating‚ i.e.could not
Free Drug addiction Recreational drug use Categorical imperative
According to deontology‚ actions is considered moral or immoral based on the adherence to duties‚ or rules It is described as “duty” from the word “deon” from Greek (CVP‚ p.10). The thing that determine what "right" is its settlement with a moral standard based on this theory is the rightness part of the action have to be greater than the good of it. Deontology got its foundations from Immanuel Kant. Kant’s theory is considered deontological for numerous reasons. Starting off‚ Kant states that in
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
1. “The imperative thus says which action possible by me would be good‚ and represents the practical rule in relation to a will that does not at once do an action just because it is good‚ party because the subject does not always know that it is good‚ party because‚ even if he knew this‚ his maxims could still be opposed to the objective principles of practical reason” (4:414). Kant’s categorical imperative states that our actions should be in accord with universal good and not driven by any personal
Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Philosophy
From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model‚ as Wood’s revealed‚ one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL)‚ Conception of Value‚ Conception of Autonomy. A. Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law ( FUL) The way Kant applied his famous and first formula‚ namely the Formulas of Universal Law (FUL) and the Formula of Law of Nature (FLN) to four famous examples of maxims contrary to duty
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Morality
Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth-century German philosopher. Essentially Kant’s most important principles for being ethical are good will and moral laws. According to Kant‚ a person who has the tenacity of good will influenced by moral values and act in accordance with this rather than their own desires is considered a person of goodwill. Consequently‚ Kant’s moral theory is deontology‚ which entails acting out of duty rather than inclination or desirability of idiosyncratic interests. In deontology
Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics