Love Your Neighbor As Yourself: Response to Ethical Egoism PHIL-122 22 March 2013 We are often taught at an early age that when struggling to make a decision to “let our consciences be our guides”. Conscience can be defined as our adherence to moral principles‚ or our considerations of fairness and justice. The word “consideration” is used because every individual has their own standards for what they feel to be morally right versus what they feel to be morally wrong‚ however this concept
Premium Morality Ethics
Egoism and utilitarianism are consequential theories that refer to that the outcomes are the most importance. However‚ there is a big difference‚ egoism pursued my benefits and utilitarianism aims to the greatest mount of people’s benefit and their happiness. Kant’s ethics‚ virtue theory and ethic of care are non-consequential theories. Kant’s ethics
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue
Part A (a): Ethical dilemma Kate is faced with the dilemma is weather to report about the contaminated milk to the Queensland Food Safety Authority (FSA). Ethical egoism Under ethical egoism‚ Kate should report the issue to the food safety Authority. Because under the ethical egoism it is maximising the self-interest which she doesn’t want to see customers get ill and furthermore the business get bad publicity. Also being rewarded as a most honest person in the restaurant she doesn’t want to be
Premium Stakeholder Ethics Immanuel Kant
The deliberate act of ending another ’s life‚ given his or her consent‚ is formally referred to as euthanasia. At present‚ euthanasia is one of the most controversial social-ethical issues that we face‚ in that it deals with a sensitive subject matter where there is much uncertainty as to what position one ought to take. Deliberately killing another person is presumed by most rational people as a fundamental evil act. However‚ when that person gives his or her consent to do so‚ this seems to give
Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics
According to the text‚ Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong‚ in addition to the four arguments supporting ethical egoism‚ there are five arguments against it. I will present these in the same manner as the others. The first argument against ethical egoism comes from Brian Medlin and it is “The Inconsistent Outcomes Argument”. This argument claims the theory of ethical egoism cannot be true because it fails to meet a necessary condition of morality—namely‚ being a guide to action. The second argument
Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy
teachers to safety‚ and he was shot more than once for his efforts. According to an ethical egoist‚ Sanders was morally wrong‚ because he failed to maximize is own well being. However‚ most people will agree that his sacrifice saved many and he is a hero because of it. This example is just one way to show how ethical egoism is not the best possible moral philosophy to follow. One argument against ethical egoism is that the theory does not provide a way to solve conflicts of interest. For example
Premium Morality Ethics Columbine High School massacre
Ethical egoism is the normative theory that the promotion of one’s own good is in accordance with morality. In the strong version‚ it is held that it is always moral to promote one’s own good‚ and it is never moral not to promote it. In the weak version‚ it is said that although it is always moral to promote one’s own good‚ it is not necessarily never moral to not. That is‚ there may be conditions in which the avoidance of personal interest may be a moral action. In an imaginary construction
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
I believe in Ethical Egoism and think it would be the best way for people to live. If everyone believed in Ethical Egoism‚ the world would probably have better people in my opinion. With Ethical Egoism‚ a person will be able to get ahead in their own life and provide a better life for him or his family. While being an ethical egoist you can still help others so the world won’t be a completely selfish world. And combined with the social contract‚ it keeps people and things in an order. By believing
Premium Ethical egoism Individualism Egoism
Ethical Egoism Imagine that you’re walking down a crowded street and an old woman with bags in her hand is walking towards you. The handles on her bags break‚ and all of her belongings go tumbling to the ground. People walk by‚ look at her‚ and keep walking. Unlike them‚ you stop and help her pick everything up. She simply looks at you and says‚ “Thank you”. You smile at her and then continue on your way‚ feeling much better about yourself because you cared enough to stop and help. Some people
Free Ethical egoism Egoism Morality
try and help solve this problem‚ we are going to focus one two branches of ethics‚ Utilitarianism and Kantianism. I’m going to focus on Bentham’s version of Utilitarianism‚ as the two lines of thinking seem to differ the most when his version is used. The odd part is‚ even though the two theories are so different‚ I believe that they will reach the same conclusion in this situation. The main idea of Kantianism is that we need to respect each other’s autonomy and treat people as ends
Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant