composer’s perspective. This has been achieved through my study of Geoffrey Robertson’s 1998 memoir The Justice Game‚ which discourages involving emotion in the justice system and suggests that the current system is effective‚ the conflicting 2013 7.30 Report episode “Jill Meagher’s husband calls her killer’s sentence a disgrace” which uses emotion to communicate the flaws in the justice system.‚ and the Michael Leunig 2013 cartoon Julian Assange from The Age‚ which supports Robertson’s view that the courtroom
Premium The Age Michael Leunig
and individuals’ perspectives are always going to be subjective as their personal paradigms‚ context and profession invariably influence their interpretation. Geoffrey Robertson’s Trials of OZ and Diana In the Dock: Does Privacy Matter? in The Justice Game primarily constructed as personal retrospectives demonstrate how conflicting perspectives are the result of bias or self-interest. Radio National’s Rear Vision Program explores the ideological dichotomy between the media and privacy whilst opposing
Premium Privacy Privacy law
the fact that we use our language as a tool against truth‚ and this language is filled with kludges that block the existence of absolute truth. Geoffrey Robertson does the same when writing‚ adding his perspective To the prisoner of Venda. The justice game‚ being a non-fiction book‚ automatically causes us to see the content as truth. Robertson uses this medium to position himself on a level of superiority where he tells us‚ the readers‚ his perspective in such a way that we see it as a fact. This
Premium Is the glass half empty or half full?
The X and Y game What is a game where you have four persons to a team‚ and each person shows an X and Y card each round and according to what each other person‚ including themselves shows they get a certain number of points added on or taken off? What is the meaning of this game? What does it show? This game shows how individual people act in a group. When every person in a group cooperates something gets done‚ but if people are out for themselves‚ and fail to recognize that they are in this together
Premium Thought Person The Game
Jordan Dixon November 9‚ 2012 Justice by Michael J. Sandel Throughout life our morals are questioned numerous times and it is completely up to decide what is morally correct and what is logically correct. From that step it is then up to us to decide which one matters most to us. Merriam-Webster defines utilitarianism as “a doctrine that the useful is the good and that the determining consideration of right conduct should be the usefulness of its consequences; specifically: a theory that the
Free Utilitarianism Ethics John Stuart Mill
sake of town-wide happiness? I honestly struggled with finding my perspective on these concepts. Everything I thought I had figured out about justice and morality was questioned when I brought it up on a large scale dealing with happiness and life-saving events. Additionally‚ another part of the book that made me question peoples’ reasoning with justice is Bentham’s theory of utilitarianism—the fact that we like pleasure and dislike pain. I agree that we all enjoy pleasure‚ but sometimes the pleasurable
Free Utilitarianism Ethics Morality
Michael X on death row techniques “In the hope that public and political appetite for capital punishment would weary” – Personification. Robertson uses this to convey his opinion that people are quite savage and get pleasure from the death of people. “Michael X could have been executed at any moment‚ while his impoverished lawyer was waiting for someone to cancel their Caribbean holiday.” Irony. Robertson is highlighting the ignorance of most people in the middle to upper class in regard to the
Premium Capital punishment Ku Klux Klan Joan of Arc
it provides him or her with an equation. If I make decision A‚ there will be X positive consequences and Y negative consequences; if I make decision B there will be X positive consequences and Y negative consequences. Therefore‚ it would be morally correct to choose A or B based on the highest number of positive consequences or the lowest number of negative consequences. In the words of Michael Sandel in his book Justice‚ “Its (utilitarianism) main idea is simply stated and intuitively appealing:
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
kinds of retributive justice. The classical definition embraces the idea that the amount of punishment must be proportional to the amount of harm caused by the offense. A more recent version‚ supported by Michael Davis‚ discharges this idea and replaces it with the idea that the amount of punishment must be proportional to the amount of unfair advantage gained by the wrongdoer. Davis introduced this version of retributive justice in the early 1980s‚ at a time when retributive justice was making a recovery
Premium Punishment Justice Criminal justice
Justice - Recognition of human rights - Equity - Equality - Fairness - Access to the legal system Access: the capacity to gain access to the legal system in order to achieve a legal remedy. Equity: the law doesn’t ’see’ individual circumstances - Justice should be blind. Fairness: a difficult concept. What is ’fair’. Equality does not always lead to fairness. We agree it should be ’fair’‚ but cannot always agree on what this means. Equality: Equal treatment of all. Human Rights:
Premium Law Human rights