EXPEDITING THE DISPOSAL OF CASES CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Justice delayed is justice denied but with the lapse of time attitude of people has been changed and now any delay in the disposition of justice is regarded as injustice to persons seeking justice before the court of law. For a country the size of ours and with its multicultural identity‚ the justice delivery system also faces challenges to keep up with efficiency required to deliver justice without any pendency. In order to tackle the problem
Premium Court Judge
there is one topic where people are innocent until proven guilty. It is an actual presumption where the judge and jury assume they are innocent until they show otherwise. That is why a defendant can remain silent‚ “plead the fifth‚” or propose evidence to his or her assumption of innocence. In another defense case of a criminal charge is when the prosecutor demonstrates the jury or the judge that there is no reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilty. When reasonable doubt is at hand‚ then the
Premium Law Jury Criminal law
1st National Law & Governance Essay Competition Judicial Accountability Bill – Needs “Power tends to corrupt a man‚ and absolute power corrupts man absolutely.” -Lord Acton In India Government has basically three organs with itself that is the Legislative‚ Executive and Judiciary at its both State and the Centre level and there is a separation of power among the three which means the functions of the Government bodies
Free Separation of powers Law Judge
stare decisis’ (stand by what has been decided). Precedent can either be declaratory precedent or original precedent. When a case is brought before a Court‚ the facts of the case has to be established by the court. After the facts are established‚ the judges will formulate and apply the relevant legal principle (the law) and reach their conclusion and decision. In accordance to doctrine this principle may form a guide for future cases. It can either be binding or persuasive. The general is‚ were the subsequent
Premium Precedent Stare decisis Ratio decidendi
Secondly‚ we will examine the education system before and after the 20th century. Here‚ we will look at changes‚ if any‚ that have been made to accommodate more of a diverse make up of judges. Lastly‚ we will look into discrimination‚ and if this plays any factor in the current judiciary. Picture in your mind‚ a judge in court. Almost everyone will have a similar image; an older gentleman‚ most likely middle class in a flowing gown and a white wig upon his head. This stereotype seems to be almost ingrained
Free United Kingdom Law Court
Japan’s Civil Law System Gwen‚ Simmons Japan’s Civil Law System The purpose of civil law is to resolve non-criminal disputes. These disagreements may occur over the meaning of contracts‚ divorce‚ child custody‚ property ownership‚ either personal‚ or property damage. Civil courts are a place where decisions can be made to solve problems peacefully. The goal of a civil court is to provide legal remedies that ultimately solve problems. Civil law can be based on state or federal statute
Premium Law Common law Civil law
of the Supreme Court said‚ “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” So what is jury nullification and how does it influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices? The definition of jury nullification according to thefreedictionary.com website jury nullification is defined as a sanctioned doctrine wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the instructions of the judge in order to reach a verdict based upon their own consciences
Premium Jury Law Supreme Court of the United States
Allen v. Totes/Isotoner Corporation. 123 Ohio St.3d 216‚ 2009-Ohio-4231 Facts of the Case: LaNisa Allen appealed the original judgment in favor of Totes/Isotoner Corporation on the issue of whether the Ohio Fair Employment Practices Act‚ as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act‚ prohibits an employer from discriminating against a female employee because of or on the basis of lactation. Relevant law associated includes whether Allen established a prima facie case of “sex discrimination on
Premium Pregnancy Discrimination Prima facie
conscionable campaign of the judges by the judges for the judges". One of the suggestions and effective measures for the disposal of pending cases is to increase the judge-strength when the case docket becomes over loaded and the increase in judge-strength must be at an appropriate time so that the increased strength can cope up with the overloaded cases. To put an end to the huge pendency of cases at all levels it is desirable to appoint more judges‚ adhoc judges and retired judges and also drafting senior
Free Law Judge Court
conservative‚ liberal‚ and moderate; this field is the metaphysical standpoints employed by judges to interpret laws. Theses recounts to the United States Supreme Court and the US courts and how the honesties and also the judges who work in those courts apply their belief systems. Judicial philosophy is extremely important because they decide which judges are agreed to unique court arrangements. Despite the fact that few judges observe to a precise viewpoint‚ most have a complete attitude that is conservative
Premium Law Judge Separation of powers