When you look at torture and the idea of torture you also have to look at what both a just and unjust act is. Both Aristotle and Mill discuss justice and injustice along with just and unjust acts. So in order to determine if it is ever permissible to torture another person according to Mill and Aristotle‚ you have to first look at both of their definitions of justice and if the act is just or unjust. In Aristotle’s Book II of Nicomachean Ethics‚ he explains that virtue of character is the mean to
Premium Alcohol intoxication Voluntary action Ethics
In addition‚ my personal dilemma can also be examined by using the utilitarian‚ deontological‚ and virtue ethics frameworks. FRAMEWORK: UTILITARIAN The utilitarian framework originates from John Stuart Mill and can also be known as the consequentialist framework. These frameworks can be identified by these two names because they both focus on the final consequences of a decision as well as maximizing the utility (benefits) to society. When I was
Premium Ethics Virtue ethics Virtue
homeless or giving charity‚ something that benefits someone besides them-self‚ is what brings most happiness to most people. The rule of mill is based off of the decisions we make. The only thing that is important‚ Mill proposes‚ is good deed. Mill states we should always benefit other people besides ourself as much as possible and be able to consider any consequences. Mill suggest we should always think about any possible outcomes. Each one of our decisions and or actions‚ we should base them off the
Premium
John Stuart Mill was a British philosopher and one of the most influential ones at his time. When looking at John Stuart Mill we see the economic‚ political‚ and moral theorist that he was‚ but what type of life did he lead to become the man he became? What education and influences did he have to become the “ideal Victorian man?” What characteristics define an ideal Victorian man? First off‚ let us start by looking at his childhood and life‚ his influences and what made him the way he was. From there
Premium John Stuart Mill Political philosophy Utilitarianism
I.233) or‚ as he also calls it‚ “intuitionism‚” which was espoused in different ways by Kant‚ Reid‚ and their followers in Britain (e.g. Whewell and Hamilton). Though there are many differences among intuitionist thinkers‚ one “grand doctrine” that Mill suggests they all affirm is the view that “the constitution of the mind is the key to the constitution of external nature—that the laws of the human intellect have a necessary correspondence with the objective laws of the universe‚ such that these
Premium
beginning of this work of his‚ "The subjection of Women"‚ Mill sets forth the objective of the essay. He explains in clear terms that the legal subordination of one sex to the other is wrong in itself. This principle which regulates the existing social relations between the two sexes ought to be replaced by a principle of perfect equality. This principle should admit no power or privileges on the one side or disabilities on the other. Mill rejects society’s claim that the subordination of women is
Premium Female Male Sex
This argumentative essay will discuss whether or not a Millian society‚ based upon Mill’s writing‚ would have a governing body that would be able to provide an equal basis for positive and negative freedom for its community members. I will argue that a society built solely upon Mill’s arguments would have a government that would ensure people have negative freedom; however this regime would not provide any significant amount of positive freedoms. I will argue this society and government has mostly
Premium John Stuart Mill Liberty Political philosophy
Mill would say that torture is acceptable if it increases the happiness of a greater amount of people than if the torture were not carried out. For example‚ if one prisoner had information that could free 1000 people from certain death and if by obtaining this information it would be highly probable that you could save these people’s lives then I think he would say that torturing the prisoner is justified. I don’t think Kant’s morality has to do with intentions like kindness per se‚ but more to
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
principle is another.”(Mill‚ 1863) In other words‚ if we simply choose the action that provides the most happiness to people involved in a certain situation‚ and apply this mentality to whatever situation we are in‚ this will bring the most happiness. This doesn’t necessarily mean we have to give up our own happiness‚ because if everyone did this‚ none of us would be happy. Therefore‚ sacrificing our own happiness would only be good if it produced more happiness overall. Just as Mill‚ I do not believe
Premium
John Stuart Mill: “Private Domain” John Stuart Mill’s explanation of “private domain” is a fairly simple concept. In Mill’s words‚ the basis of “private domain” is: “Over himself‚ over his own body and mind‚ the individual is sovereign.” Mill means that individuals should be able to express themselves in any manner without government interference. Society should not influence how a person carries himself‚ because the individual is the only person living that particular life. Mill feels strongly
Premium Liberty Political philosophy John Stuart Mill