In “Can Computers Think?” John Searle argues against the prevailing view in philosophy‚ psychology‚ and artificial intelligence‚ which emphasizes the analogies between the functioning of the human brain and the functioning of digital computers. (Searle‚ 372) He asks whether a digital computer‚ as defined‚ can think. Specifically‚ he asks whether instantiating or implementing the right computer program with the right inputs and outputs is sufficient to‚ or constitutive of‚ thinking‚ to which he
Premium Semantics Computer John Searle
Mind‚ Brains and Programs by John R. Searle discusses the idea of AI‚ specifically Strong AI. I will argue that his comments on AI being impossible to develop are incorrect. Searle had discussed many points but thinks too low of what makes up the intentionality he supports. (47 words) John R. Searle discusses AI with several points. They can be summed up into five points. The 1st point as well as 2nd point compare living animal’s ‘intentionality’ being based on the causal features and comparing
Premium Philosophy of mind Artificial intelligence Psychology
that the mind is like a computer program‚ which is the software of the body. It asserts that anything which has the ability to utilize our minds has intentionality‚ the ability to have thoughts about something. John Searle presents an argument which counters this idea called the Chinese Room which claims that even if something can mimic the workings of the human mind‚ it does not have intentionality. Functionalism describes the theory speaking about the mind and the body; how the mind is akin to
Premium Smartphone Mobile phone Motorola
contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism. John Searle and Rene Descartes both had opinions on dualism. John believe different aspects like mental and physical both are one substance. Rene‚ on the other hand‚ believes two different substances like mental and physical are different things. Rene even talked about how thoughts and feelings that are nonmaterial exists in material place. 2. Compare and contrast the views of George Berkeley and Thomas Hobbes on the mind. George and Thomas
Premium Free will René Descartes Metaphysics
their shareholders. The company actually completed a $1 billion share repurchase program and authorized a new $1 billion program. It is important to note here that the strong‚ well planned discipline that Tyco utilized as an organization allowed them to optimize their financial resources‚ even in a bad economy‚ so much so that they were able to return capital to share holders and authorize a share repurchase program of up to $1 billion. In a time where most companies are going under due to consumer
Premium Leadership Management
behaviors. John Searle does not believe that a computer can ever think because they do not have the intention to do so; however he believes that machines rather‚ could think. In this paper we will be discussing
Premium Computer Science Technology
thought experiment developed by John Searle. Searle imagines himself in a room receiving pieces of paper inscribed with Chinese symbols through a slot. Searle himself does not understand any Chinese. Searle locates the set of symbols he receives in an English instruction book and then sends out the corresponding set of symbols representing a response as identified in the book back through the slot; similar to how a computer follows the instructions of its program. The person on the outside is inclined
Premium Mind Philosophy of mind Artificial intelligence
Mind and Brain - Is There a Difference? Lisa Fitzsimons PHI 200 Instructor Brianne Larsen 02/20/2012 The brain is the most complex organ of the human body; scientists still have many unanswered questions about it. One question is are the mind and the brain the same entity or are they separate entities within a person’s head? It is undisputed that the actions of the mind are within the brain. But are the actions of the mind only neurological impulses sent between neurons within the brain
Premium Brain Neuron Cerebrum
In the article “Can Computers Think‚” John Searle makes the claim that computers‚ while they can simulate understanding or emotions‚ cannot think in the same way that a human mind can. John Searle objects to what he calls “strong AI‚” the claim that the brain is just one type of hardware that can “run” the program that is essentially the human mind‚ and thus that if computers cannot currently think‚ they will one day be able to. Searle supports his claim on the basis that while computers run entirely
Premium Philosophy of mind Artificial intelligence Functionalism
professor‚ John R. Searle must include an understanding that a machine has the ability to “think” just because it has been fed the “correct” computer program that he calls “Strong AI” (artificial intelligence). However‚ he points out that “Strong AI” misses the basic point that any software program is simply a framework that designates the ways in which certain symbols are managed. That manipulation cannot be‚ under any definition or circumstance‚ be considered actual thought. Searle uses what
Premium Artificial intelligence Philosophy of mind Chinese room