Juvenile transfer is the process of removing juvenile offenders from the juvenile court and placing them into the adult court. Although states implement this process in varying ways‚ it is seen in different viewpoints as either having a positive effect on juveniles or a negative effect. Studies have been conducted examining the statistics regarding recidivism for juveniles who have been transferred to the adult court versus those who have not. After taking a look at these two perspectives‚ I have
Premium Crime Criminology Juvenile delinquency
The process for selecting a U.S. Supreme Court judge and justices is done by nomination by the president. This appointment is one of the most important decisions in a Presidents legacy that has an impact on generations since U.S. Supreme Court judges and justices serve for life. In Article II‚ Section 2‚ of the Constitution states the President will nominate‚ then the Senate will receive the Presidents nomination and decide whether to consent to the nomination‚ or approve or deny by a simple majority
Premium President of the United States United States Election
Mental Health Court Mental Health Court 2013 By: Elizabeth Gavin Professor Contino Class: Corrections One 9/17/2013 2013 By: Elizabeth Gavin Professor Contino Class: Corrections One 9/17/2013 Mental health courts are a resource given to prisoners who would normally be put in prison if they had not decided to join this special program. Mental health court is a court run program by the district attorney’s office in some counties
Premium Mental disorder Crime Bench
either the magistrates court or the crown court depending on the severity of the crime. Jonas ’s attacker could be charged with a number of non fatal offences ranging from the lowest non fatal offences which are common assault and battery under the Criminal Justice Act 1988‚ to the higher offences assault causing actual bodily harm and grievous bodily harm under the Offence Against the Person Act (1861). In order for the attacker to be charged within the criminal courts‚ the prosecution must prove
Premium Criminal law Battery Assault
Court Issues Many issues face our court systems and administrative in today’s society. The future will hold many changing aspects‚ issues‚ and trends. Victim rights will also change as we move forward into the future. There will be many aspects of victim rights that will remain the same as in the past and the present but will forever change in the future. The future will hold many changes in our court systems including victim right‚ language services‚ and administrative. Immigrations and culture
Premium Law United States Judge
The plaintiff of this case is Harvest States Cooperatives and the defendant is Anderson. Harvest States Cooperatives sued Anderson for breach of contract‚ after Anderson failed to deliver 5‚000 bushels of corn. Anderson had spoken to a representative of the coop over the phone to inquire the price of corn which he had available for sale. Harvest States Cooperatives asked Anderson if he would like to see a contract and Anderson said yes. Following through‚ Harvest States Cooperatives sent Anderson
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract
AJS 502 January 28‚ 2013 Instructor: Kevin Moore Court Systems As the gavel sounds there is silence in the courtroom. The Judge has made his final decision‚ and the outcome is life without the possibility of parole. The courtroom is filled with mixed emotions and the prosecution and family have a sense of justice‚ although the family of the perpetrator feels anguish. Criminal court is perceived as the place of justice where criminals are punished and the victims get closure
Premium Law Jury Supreme Court of the United States
1. Supreme Court justices have a serious job of determining if something is unconstitutional or not. As with any big decision‚ there is a precise manor in which the justices decide weather an act is unconstitutional. There are three models that’s the courts follow. The first is the legal model. The legal model states that the court can base their rulings off of the previous rulings of the lower courts. The positive of this model is that the Supreme Court justices have a good background on what went
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
As a result‚ the court‚ assumes the primary institution to interpret the law of the land. Yet technical‚ political‚ and institutional limitations have been established to restrict the power of the supreme court. Chief Justice Jay believed courts only retain the right to interpret the law within context of a case or controversy. Hypothetically entrapping the court’s power to lend advisory opinions concerning the law. Even so‚ this limitation is not applied to multiple state courts making it more of
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Law
United States citizens because of the Supreme Court case‚ Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda was arrested for rape and kidnapping of a woman. Following his arrest‚ he was convicted based on his confession of the crime. Nevertheless‚ the Supreme Court ruled that his rights were violated according to the Fifth Amendment‚ which lead to his release. Reynolds Lancaster and Gina Jones were two authors that pointed importance of rights and issues related to the case Miranda v. Arizona‚ which lead to the Miranda
Premium Crime Police Law