Katzebach‚ J.R. & Smith‚ D.K. (1993). The Discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review‚ 71 (March-April)‚ 111-1146 Darling‚ J & Nurmi‚ R (1997) International Management Leadership. New York: International Business Press. John M. Ivancevich‚ Robert Konopaske‚ Michael T. Matteson. (2008). Organizational Behavior and Management.
Premium
FUNCTIONS OF HUMAN RESOURCE JALITZA MATOS SAINT LEO UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 14‚ 2012 “People human talent‚ employees are assets not liabilities” (Ivancevich & Konopaske‚ 2012). Many scholars have studied the science of people and why people react and respond in certain ways. To have a successful business‚ employers must figure a way to satisfy their employees while continuing to be profitable. Many organization are extremely competitive in terms of what they offer to their
Premium Human resource management Internal Revenue Service
manager needs to understand the differences associated with the host country. "Globalization is defined as this interdependency of transportation‚ distribution‚ communication‚ and economic networks across international borders" (Gibson‚ Ivancevich‚ Donnelly‚ & Konopaske‚ 2012‚ p 57). Each firm has their own organizational culture. According to Hellriegel‚ Slocum and Woodman (2001)‚ organizational culture represents a complex pattern of beliefs‚ expectations‚ values and behaviors shared by organizational
Premium Management Organizational culture Culture
program syllabus‚ Alexandria University‚ Egypt‚ in collaboration with Georgia State university‚ USA. The case is related to the Organizational Behavior study from the reference book "Organizational Behavior and Management"‚ ninth edition‚ Ivancevich‚ konopaske & Matteson. ISBN 978-0-07-122089-7 Case 3.1: Personality Testing‚ Yes or No? Mark‚ a project leader in Austin‚ Texas‚ needed a new software engineer for his eight-person team. He used his network‚ reviewed resumes‚ and invited 15 candidates
Premium Big Five personality traits Personality psychology Personality
Management Concepts XXXXXXXX Webster University MNGT 5590 Dr. Victoria Bohrer May 11‚ 2011 Abstract This paper compares and contrasts the concepts found on John P. Kotter’s‚ Leading Change (1996)‚ book and the concepts presented by John M. Ivancevich‚ Robert Konopske and Michael T. Mattenson’s Organizational Behavior and Management text book. Kotter emphasizes in each step the importance of dealing with human emotions and how to better manage them when dealing with organizational change. The
Premium Change management Emotion Concept
occupational health issues can impact an organization’s bottom-line. In many organizations‚ one of the major goals is to reduce occupational hazards‚ avoid injuries‚ and minimize manpower loss. HR must accommodate the needs of the organization. Ivancevich & Konopaske (2013) said‚ “today‚ because of the recognition of the crucial importance of people‚ HRM in an increasing number of organizations has become a major player in developing strategic plans and facilitating changes within the organization” (p
Premium Occupational safety and health
531). Ivancevich further discusses the field of organizational behavior‚ empowerment‚ organizational processes‚ communication and organizational change. In this integrative paper‚ I will discuss the interrelationships between Kotter’s and Cohen’s change process
Premium Management Organization Strategic management
Activity 2.4 - Module 2 Case Study ERAU_MGMT_314 Module 2 Case Study Part 1 Read Application Case 3-1 Sexual Harassment Cases Are Becoming More Complex on pages 90-91 in the text. Analyze the case and thoroughly answer the three questions at the end of the case. 1. Should the president of Caritas Christi Health Care be fired? Why? 2. Why is the handling of sexual harassment cases considered complicated? 3. Explain in your own words why consistency in handling sexual
Premium Sexual harassment Bullying Employment
References: Emmerich‚ R. (2002). The 10 commandments of workplace motivation. Occupational Hazards‚ 64(1)‚ 69-70. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213686337?accountid=35996 Ivancevich‚ J.‚ Konopaske‚ R.‚ & Matteson‚ M Mozes‚ M.‚ Josman‚ Z.‚ & Yaniv‚ E. (2011). Corporate social responsibility organizational identification and motivation. Social Responsibility Journal‚ 7(2)‚ 310-325. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17471111111141558 Nadeem
Premium Maslow's hierarchy of needs Motivation
1. Describe the major differences between Maslow’s need hierarchy and Alderfer’s ERG explanation of motivation. According to Gibson‚ Ivancevich‚ Donnelly‚ and Konopaske the Maslow’s need hierarchy depends on what people already have and then grows up hierarchically‚ when the Alderfer’s states that needs depends more on three factors: existence‚ relatedness and growth. Maslow’s needs are more of pyramid‚ going from the simplest needs to the more complex one to fulfill being from bottom to top:
Premium Maslow's hierarchy of needs