SPD4288 Events and Exhibition Management Group 1 : Lo Kwok Hung‚ Johnny 10105548S Cheung Wai Ying‚ Edith 10886871S Hui Wai Ling‚ Rachel 10886717S So On Na‚ Anna 10873814S Tse Kit Yee‚ Kinki 10100215S Content Page Executive Summary ..... Company Background and Product ..... Event Concept & Theme ..... Venue ..... Event Audience ..... Outline of Event Activities
Premium Wedding Wedding dress White wedding
Tsang Ching Hung 53081466 LW2903 S05 Human Resources Management Charu SHARMA ASSIGNMENT QUESTION Semester B‚ 2013/2014 On Monday‚ 13 January 2014‚ Ada wrote to Ben saying‚ “Please sell me your vintage BNW car for $80‚000”. On Tuesday‚ 14 January 2014‚ Ben replied by leaving a message on Ada’s voicemail‚ “Sure‚ provided you pay by cash”. Ben then changed his mind and he posted a letter to Ada which read‚ “I have reconsidered the matter. I am no longer able to sell you my BNW”. This letter arrived
Premium Contract Plaintiff Offer and acceptance
Therefore the AusJCL has decided to re-open applications for the WYCC. If you wish to apply‚ please email me at tristan.s.boyd@gmail.com asap‚ and in any event no later than Sunday 29 June. This deadline for new applications will be strictly enforced‚ and no other methods of application will be accepted. In an application please provide the following information: Full name‚ date of birth‚ postal and email addresses‚ phone number‚ FIDE and ACF ratings‚ and the division(s) applied for. You may also choose
Premium E-mail address Natural selection Chess
Tullula Investments Ltd is a large South Australian company‚ which owns and operates many hotel and restaurants throughout Australia. Italian Cuisine Ltd‚ a food and catering business whose headquarters are in Brisbane‚ supplies goods commonly used by businesses such as Tullula Investments Ltd. On September 1‚ 2000‚ Italian Cuisine Ltd sent a fax to Tullula Investments Ltd‚ which read: "Can offer latest ’Speedy Rice Cookers’ at $100 each." On October 1‚ 2000‚ Tullula Investments Ltd faxed a reply
Premium Marketing
1 (a) According to the information from the question‚ Hei Lau’s letter amounted to an offer to sell his second-hand car and the offer would remain open for one week. Although Chiu Chor made the first letter to Hei Lau for inquiring “whether he would take HK$40‚000 for the car”‚ the original offer was still valid because this inquiry was a mere request for information about the offer rather than a counter offer‚ it does not imply a rejection of the offer. An example of a mere request is the case
Premium Contract Contract law
different scenarios with the couples involved. To assist with this task‚ it is important to determine what this advertisement means within the English Legal System and its significance to Mick. Usually most advertisements are classified as an “Invitation to Treat”‚ and these involve a preliminary stage in which one party invites the other to make an offer. This is shown in the Gibson v. Manchester City Council case of 1979 whereby Mr Gibson sent an application form to purchase his current council house
Premium Employment Advertising Marketing
serious expression of willingness which is made with the intention that it will become binding upon acceptance (Storer v Manchester City Council). However‚ not all statements made are offer. Statements which are not offer are called invitation to treat. An invitation to treat is the expression of willingness to hear from the other party which may or may not lead to a contract (Gibson v Manchester City Council). It is the seriousness of the term which matters and seriousness is reflected from the price
Premium Contract
issues In this case‚ the relevant law is the display of goods in and invitation to treat. Hazli put the vase to be display of goods. This case‚ based on case : Fisher v.Bell ( 1961) 1 QB 394 CA ) Fisher was offering for a flick-knife. He put the knife for display of goods and invitation to treat. According to the ordinary law of contract the display of an article with a price on it a shop window is merely an invitation to treat. Footnotes
Premium Contract
issues regarding an invitation to treat (ITT)‚ the fact shows that James has placed an advertisement at the Star newspaper for the sale of his BMW motorbike. This is advertisement is not an offer‚ it had similar with the cases of‚ Majumder v A-G of Sarawak. For the example cases of Majumder v A-G of Sarawak‚ the Malaysia court held that such advertisement is invitation to treat. Federal court held that an advertisement in newspaper for the post of a doctor was an invitation to treat. Dahari responded
Premium Contract
described as the indication of one person to another of his willingness to contract on specified terms. In Patridge v Crittenden‚ the advertisement was an invitation to treat. Charlie’s advertisement is merely an invitation to all his friends of attending the party. The fact seems that Charlie is not making an offer but an invitation to treat. However‚ an offer had been made by Charlie’s friends as their willingness to make the entry fee payment of $5 for the party. Therefore‚ I consider an offer
Premium Contract Contract law