Anheuser-Busch‚ INC- Defendant * PLAINTIFF’S INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT TO: Defendant Truck Driver BY: Plaintiff Plaintiff‚ by and through his attorney‚ requests that the defendant answer the following Interrogatories fully‚ under oath and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (FRCP)‚ title V‚ Rule 33. Interrogatory 1- Were you cautious and thorough when you locked he door on the truck‚ making sure your cargo
Premium Jury Civil procedure Criminal law
Unit 3: Assignment PA110: Civil Litigation I 10/14/2013 Tajada Anderson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING‚ ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES‚ INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes now the plaintiff‚ Justin King‚ by and through his attorney‚ states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff
Premium Jury Jurisdiction Plaintiff
r ------------------------------------------------- Draft Letter to Justin King PA110-Professor Rakowski March 30‚ 2013 Tari Dowling Kaplan University March 30‚ 2013 Tari Dowling Kaplan University DOWLING LAW FIRM March 30‚ 2013 623 N. Grant Ave York‚ NE 68467 (402)366-0467 Tdowling1034@yahoo.com Dear Mr. King‚ I really appreciate you talking to my paralegal last week. I know
Premium Answer Prince Question
STATE OF WINSCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT OF ADAMS COUNTY CONSTANCE WOLF‚ F/K/A CONSTANCE WOLFGRAM PLANTIFF V. Civil Action No. 112 LEWIS OLSON DEFENDANT V. ALBER DOBIASH DEFENDANT COMPLAINT Comes Plaintiff‚ Constance Wolf F/K/A Constance Wolfgram‚ by counsel‚ and for her complaint states as follows: 1. The Court has jurisdiction in this matter under section 6 of the code of the state of Wisconsin. 2. Plaintiff‚ Constance Wolfgram‚ resides at
Premium Real estate
PA110-02: Civil Litigation Kaplan University Unit 3 Assignment Draft the Justin King Complaint Seth Eisenberg By Haycha Salazar IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING‚ ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES‚ INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff‚ Justin
Premium Illinois Jury Jurisdiction
Defendant states: 1. Interrogatories were served on March 11th‚ 2013. 2. The Plaintiff’s Responses to the interrogatories were due no later than April 10th‚ 2013. To date‚ no Response has been received. 3. A good faith effort has been made to recover the Plaintiff’s Responses. On March 25th‚ 2013‚ counsel for the Defendant requested in writing to Plaintiff’s counsel for a response‚ noting that if responses were not received by April 10th‚ 30 days after service of Interrogatories‚ a Motion to Compel
Premium United States Civil procedure Lawyer
The transition of the urban development of Paris France towards the second empire- Napoleon lll 1760-1820 During the industrial revolution in Western Europe‚ the shift from agrarian to industrialised and urban society was led by Britain. Britain‚ a powerful empire was consistent in making new scientific discoveries that led to the boom of their economy‚ specifically the textile industry. The invention of machineries such as the ‘flying shuttle’ that enabled more than 1 weaver to do the work of
Premium Industrial Revolution Factory United Kingdom
In further support of the above‚ Defendant states: 1. In this action‚ the Defendant served Plaintiff written interrogatories on April 30th 2013. This written discovery was served by hand-delivery. 2. Defendant believes that by the Plaintiff not complying with the discovery request as requested that the Plaintiff be found in contempt for not answering the following interrogatories: 1. Does Mr. King have a mental problem? 2. Was Mr. King wearing a DOT approved helmet? 3. Does Mr. King
Premium Civil procedure United States Lawyer
Reporter: Glemar S. Monsales Basic Guideline for Public School Administrators to Understanding the Application of the DepEd Rules of Procedure Disciplining Authority of Non-teaching Personnel (Sec 6) School Superintendents (provision by virtue of RA 9155) Grounds for Disciplinary Action Sec. 2 of the Rules Content of the Complaint (Sec. 5) a. ) full name(s) and address(es) of the complainant b. ) full name(s) and address(es) of the person complained of as well as position and office of employment
Premium Law Appeal Court
1. Substantive law vs Procedural law a. Substantive law: defines individual rights & duties IE K law‚ employment law‚ criminal law b. Procedural law: laws that deliberate methods of enforcing the rights established by Substantive law IE litigation‚ some parts of process of Family law 2. Criminal vs Civil a. Criminal: govt vs someone for a crime designed to protect the society as a whole b. Civil: individual protects individual rights & enforces individual duties 3. Cause of Action (COA)
Premium Pleading