Interoffice Memo BSHS 305 MEMORANDUM To: All Staff Re: Recent ruling in Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California Date: July 2‚ 1976 A recent decision in the rehearing of the Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California case‚ mandates that not only should mental health professionals and social service workers warn a potential victim of possible harm by their client‚ but there is also a duty to protect the potential vicitm.
Premium Ethics Law Business ethics
Phoenix Advertising Interoffice Memorandum DATE: August 17‚ 2012 TO: Managing Director; Planning Director; Creative Director FROM: Vice President of Human Resources SUBJECT: Roanoke Branch Update In recent months‚ the Roanoke branch office has been experiencing difficulties. After a change in management‚ the graphic designers and copywriters have made it apparent that their work is no longer being received well. Although it is not completely clear‚ this employee upset may be the cause
Premium Management Corporate governance Management occupations
Part A: Interoffice Memorandum Phoenix Advertising Interoffice Memorandum DATE: July 23‚ 2014 TO: Gregory S. Forest‚ President; Zachary Sylvan‚ Vice President of Operations; Lauragina Soto‚ Vice President of Human Resources; Al Gucciardo‚ Vice President of Public Relations Operations; Troy Richards‚ Vice President of Marketing Operations; Devi Dewdat‚ Vice President of Advertising Operations; Deborah Hugo; Vice President of FinanceThe Executive Team FROM: Lauragina Soto‚ Vice President
Premium Vice President of the United States President of the United States
Interoffice Memorandum Date: 7/5/04 From: John Dokes‚ Senior Vice President‚ Integrated Sales and Marketing To: Peter Cuneo‚ Vice Chairman CC: Allen Lipson‚ President and CEO; Isaac Perlmutter‚ Vice Chairman‚ Morton Handel‚ Chairman; Kenneth West‚ Executive VP and CFO; Gui Karyo‚ Publishing President I would like to congratulate everyone on the success of our latest release. We made quite the comeback on this one! Of course‚ we need to remember that this success is the result of smart branding
Premium Marvel Comics Vice president Management occupations
RUnning Head: IntraClean Interoffice memo IntraClean Interoffice Memo HRM 531/University of Phoenix March 29th 2010 interoffice memorandum to: First Level Management from: KK subject: cOMPANY pOLIcy date: [ 5/16/2010 ] cc: As you all know IntraClean will launch a media blitz to announce publicly its new strategy. In the past‚ IntraClean’s sales force focused primarily on demonstrating and selling product. IntraCleans new focus will be a solutions/service model. This service
Premium Management Organization Entrepreneurship
named Tatiana Tarasoff‚ shortly after she wanted to just be friends with him‚ somewhat rejecting him romantically. After several sessions‚ Poddar threatened to kill Tarasoff.. After hearing this‚ Dr. Moore discussed the case with the police stating that Poddar was unstable and potentially very dangerous‚ and wanted him committed to a facility. The police took him into custody‚ but shortly released him stating that he appeared completely secure and stated he would not go near Tarasoff. At this point
Premium Law Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California Common law
Interoffice Memo HRM/531 November 18‚ 2010 Connye Harper Interoffice Memo TO: Sales Management Team FROM: RE: Merger between EnviroTech an InterClean First of all‚ I would like to take the time to say “thank you” to each one of you for your outstanding efforts‚ it has been very enjoyable to work alongside with each of you in contributing to the success of InterClean. You are all well aware of the strategic movement as announced by David Spencer is very near on the horizon. As this merger
Premium Gratitude Management 1922
opinion in the Tarasoff case is more ethically sound. The strongest argument against my opinion is that by imposing that a doctor has the duty to breach confidentiality in order to warn a third party of a potential threat can greatly impair treatment. The most important factor in ensuring that a patient receives successful treatment is by establishing a solid physician-patient relationship. This is a consequentialist view because it focuses on the future outcome‚ which in this case is effective
Premium Ethics Patient Morality
confidentiality and the therapist’s ethical obligation to maintain confidential obligation. This allows the therapist to have a therapeutic relationship with the client. Reporting this information is now mandated in most states. Clinical assessment in these cases is also important. Sitting with a client and earning their trust‚ having them confide these feelings is the first step in reporting these thoughts. Some key areas with duty to warn is the importance of clinical assessment‚ the accuracy of the threat
Premium Psychology Psychotherapy Psychiatry
The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella‚ n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar‚ a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore‚ a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at
Premium Murder Crime Law